Literature DB >> 24082266

Extension of shelf life of pear fruits using different packaging materials.

A Nath1, Bidyut C Deka, Akath Singh, R K Patel, D Paul, L K Misra, H Ojha.   

Abstract

An experiment was conducted on pear fruit (cv. 'Lagoon') to extend the shelf life by using different packaging materials. Fruits were packed in low density polyethylene (LDPE, 0.025 mm), polypropylene (PP, 0.025 mm), linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE, 0.0125 mm) and high density polyethylene (HDPE, 0.025 mm) with or without perforation and stored at ambient condition (25 ± 2 °C and 65.0 ± 5% RH). Periodical observations were recorded on CO2 & O2 concentration (%), physiological loss in weight (PLW, %), decay loss (%), firmness (kgf), colour value (colour difference and colour index), total soluble solid (TSS, °Brix), acidity (mg of malic acid/g), and ascorbic acid loss (%) at 3 days interval. Reduced rate of PLW and decay losses was recorded in pear fruits packed in PP non-perforated (8.04%) and PP perforated (12.5%), respectively as compared to other treatments. The maximum firmness (5.18 kgf) and minimum ascorbic acid loss (49.97%) were also recorded in PP non-perforated up to 12 and 15 days of storage, respectively. It could be inferred that the, PP non-perforated (0.025 mm) was the most suitable packaging materials for extending the shelf life of pear fruits up to 15 days at ambient condition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Firmness; Packaging materials; Pear fruit; Quality; Shelf life; Storage

Year:  2011        PMID: 24082266      PMCID: PMC3550856          DOI: 10.1007/s13197-011-0305-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Sci Technol        ISSN: 0022-1155            Impact factor:   2.701


  1 in total

Review 1.  Modified atmosphere packaging of fruits and vegetables.

Authors:  A A Kader; D Zagory; E L Kerbel
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 11.176

  1 in total
  8 in total

1.  Improvement of post-harvest quality of pear fruit with optimized composite edible coating formulations.

Authors:  Rudri K Dave; T V Ramana Rao; A S Nandane
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Comparative effect of different individual wrappings on shelf life of guava (Psidium guajava).

Authors:  Seema Rana; Saleem Siddiqui
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  Changes in pectin methyl esterase activity with different packaging materials and stages of fruit harvesting during cold storage of pear cv. Punjab beauty.

Authors:  Kirandeep Kaur; W S Dhillon; B V C Mahajan
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.701

4.  Influence of guar gum and chitosan enriched with lemon peel essential oil coatings on the quality of pears.

Authors:  Ayesha Iftikhar; Abdur Rehman; Muhammad Usman; Ahmad Ali; Muhammad Mushtaq Ahmad; Qayyum Shehzad; Hina Fatim; Arshad Mehmood; Abdul Moiz; Muhammad Asim Shabbir; Muhammad Faisal Manzoor; Azhari Siddeeg
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 5.  Role of internal atmosphere on fruit ripening and storability-a review.

Authors:  Vijay Paul; Rakesh Pandey
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 2.701

6.  Effects of variety on the quality of tomato stored under ambient conditions.

Authors:  M Tigist; Tilahun Seyoum Workneh; Kebede Woldetsadik
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 2.701

7.  Marketability of ready-to-eat cactus pear as affected by temperature and modified atmosphere.

Authors:  Maria Cefola; Massimiliano Renna; Bernardo Pace
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 2.701

8.  Effect of packaging materials and storage environment on postharvest quality of papaya fruit.

Authors:  Mulualem Azene; Tilahun Seyoum Workneh; Kebede Woldetsadik
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.701

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.