Literature DB >> 24081987

Influence of PCR reagents on DNA polymerase extension rates measured on real-time PCR instruments.

Jesse L Montgomery1, Carl T Wittwer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radioactive DNA polymerase activity methods are cumbersome and do not provide initial extension rates. A simple extension rate assay would enable study of basic assumptions about PCR and define the limits of rapid PCR.
METHODS: A continuous assay that monitors DNA polymerase extension using noncovalent DNA dyes on common real-time PCR instruments was developed. Extension rates were measured in nucleotides per second per molecule of polymerase. To initiate the reaction, a nucleotide analog was heat activated at 95 °C for 5 min, the temperature decreased to 75 °C, and fluorescence monitored until substrate exhaustion in 30-90 min.
RESULTS: The assay was linear with time for over 40% of the reaction and for polymerase concentrations over a 100-fold range (1-100 pmol/L). Extension rates decreased continuously with increasing monovalent cation concentrations (lithium, sodium, potassium, cesium, and ammonium). Melting-temperature depressors had variable effects. DMSO increased rates up to 33%, whereas glycerol had little effect. Betaine, formamide, and 1,2-propanediol decreased rates with increasing concentrations. Four common noncovalent DNA dyes inhibited polymerase extension. Heat-activated nucleotide analogs were 92% activated after 5 min, and hot start DNA polymerases were 73%-90% activated after 20 min.
CONCLUSIONS: Simple DNA extension rate assays can be performed on real-time PCR instruments. Activity is decreased by monovalent cations, DNA dyes, and most melting temperature depressors. Rational inclusion of PCR components on the basis of their effects on polymerase extension is likely to be useful in PCR, particularly rapid-cycle or fast PCR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24081987     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.212829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  6 in total

1.  Extraction-Free Rapid Cycle Quantitative RT-PCR and Extreme RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Virus Detection.

Authors:  Joseph C Lownik; Grayson W Way; Jared S Farrar; Rebecca K Martin
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  How to speed up the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  Stephen A Bustin
Journal:  Biomol Detect Quantif       Date:  2017-06-20

3.  Challenging the proposed causes of the PCR plateau phase.

Authors:  Linda Jansson; Johannes Hedman
Journal:  Biomol Detect Quantif       Date:  2019-03-02

4.  The kinetic requirements of extreme qPCR.

Authors:  Adam L Millington; Jessica A Houskeeper; John F Quackenbush; James M Trauba; Carl T Wittwer
Journal:  Biomol Detect Quantif       Date:  2019-03-13

5.  In-gel fluorescence detection by DNA polymerase elongation.

Authors:  Alden C Moss; Amy E Herr
Journal:  APL Bioeng       Date:  2020-11-20

6.  Rapid Optical Cavity PCR.

Authors:  Jun Ho Son; SoonGweon Hong; Amanda J Haack; Lars Gustafson; Minsun Song; Ori Hoxha; Luke P Lee
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 9.933

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.