PURPOSE: Nanoencapsulation of chemotherapeutics is an established method to target breast tumors and has been shown to enhance the efficacy of therapy in various animal models. During the past two decades, the nucleoside analog Gemcitabine has been under investigation to treat both recalcitrant and localized breast cancer, often in combination with other chemotherapeutics. In this study, we investigated the chemotherapeutic efficacy of a novel Gemcitabine-encapsulated liposome previously formulated by our group, GemPo, on both sensitive (4T1) and recalcitrant (MDA-MB-231) breast cancer cell lines. METHODS: Gemcitabine free drug and liposomal Gemcitabine were compared both in vitro and in vivo using breast cancer models. RESULTS: We demonstrated that GemPo differently hindered the growth, survival and migration of breast cancer cells, according to their drug sensitivities. Specifically, whereas GemPo was a more potent cytotoxic and apoptotic agent in sensitive breast cancer cells, it more potently inhibited cell migration in the resistant cell line. However, GemPo still acted as a more potent inhibitor of migration, in comparison with free Gemcitabine, irrespective of cell sensitivity. Administration of GemPo in a 4T1-bearing mouse model inhibited tumor growth while increasing mice survival, as compared with free Gemcitabine and a vehicle control. Interestingly, the inclusion of a mitotic inhibitor, Paclitaxel, synergized only with free Gemcitabine in this model, yet was as effective as GemPo alone. However, inclusion of Paclitaxel with GemPo significantly improved mouse survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to demonstrate the pleiotropic effects of Gemcitabine and Gemcitabine-loaded nanoparticles in breast cancer, and opens the door for a novel treatment for breast cancer patients.
PURPOSE: Nanoencapsulation of chemotherapeutics is an established method to target breast tumors and has been shown to enhance the efficacy of therapy in various animal models. During the past two decades, the nucleoside analog Gemcitabine has been under investigation to treat both recalcitrant and localized breast cancer, often in combination with other chemotherapeutics. In this study, we investigated the chemotherapeutic efficacy of a novel Gemcitabine-encapsulated liposome previously formulated by our group, GemPo, on both sensitive (4T1) and recalcitrant (MDA-MB-231) breast cancer cell lines. METHODS:Gemcitabine free drug and liposomal Gemcitabine were compared both in vitro and in vivo using breast cancer models. RESULTS: We demonstrated that GemPo differently hindered the growth, survival and migration of breast cancer cells, according to their drug sensitivities. Specifically, whereas GemPo was a more potent cytotoxic and apoptotic agent in sensitive breast cancer cells, it more potently inhibited cell migration in the resistant cell line. However, GemPo still acted as a more potent inhibitor of migration, in comparison with free Gemcitabine, irrespective of cell sensitivity. Administration of GemPo in a 4T1-bearing mouse model inhibited tumor growth while increasing mice survival, as compared with free Gemcitabine and a vehicle control. Interestingly, the inclusion of a mitotic inhibitor, Paclitaxel, synergized only with free Gemcitabine in this model, yet was as effective as GemPo alone. However, inclusion of Paclitaxel with GemPo significantly improved mouse survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to demonstrate the pleiotropic effects of Gemcitabine and Gemcitabine-loaded nanoparticles in breast cancer, and opens the door for a novel treatment for breast cancerpatients.
Authors: Forrest M Kievit; Freddy Y Wang; Chen Fang; Hyejung Mok; Kui Wang; John R Silber; Richard G Ellenbogen; Miqin Zhang Journal: J Control Release Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Karl Quint; Manuel Tonigold; Pietro Di Fazio; Roberta Montalbano; Susanne Lingelbach; Felix Rückert; Beate Alinger; Matthias Ocker; Daniel Neureiter Journal: Int J Oncol Date: 2012-10-01 Impact factor: 5.650
Authors: Ralph Graeser; Christian Bornmann; Norbert Esser; Vittorio Ziroli; Peter Jantscheff; Clemens Unger; Ulrich T Hopt; Christoph Schaechtele; Ernst von Dobschuetz; Ulrich Massing Journal: Pancreas Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti; Purvish Parikh; Joachim von Pawel; Bonne Biesma; Johan Vansteenkiste; Christian Manegold; Piotr Serwatowski; Ulrich Gatzemeier; Raghunadharao Digumarti; Mauro Zukin; Jin S Lee; Anders Mellemgaard; Keunchil Park; Shehkar Patil; Janusz Rolski; Tuncay Goksel; Filippo de Marinis; Lorinda Simms; Katherine P Sugarman; David Gandara Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-05-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rochelle R Arvizo; Oscar R Miranda; Daniel F Moyano; Chad A Walden; Karuna Giri; Resham Bhattacharya; J David Robertson; Vincent M Rotello; Joel M Reid; Priyabrata Mukherjee Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-09-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jayanta Bhattacharyya; Isaac Weitzhandler; Shihan Bryan Ho; Jonathan R McDaniel; Xinghai Li; Lei Tang; Jinyao Liu; Mark Dewhirst; Ashutosh Chilkoti Journal: Adv Funct Mater Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 18.808
Authors: Samantha T Tucci; Azadeh Kheirolomoom; Elizabeth S Ingham; Lisa M Mahakian; Sarah M Tam; Josquin Foiret; Neil E Hubbard; Alexander D Borowsky; Mo Baikoghli; R Holland Cheng; Katherine W Ferrara Journal: J Control Release Date: 2019-07-10 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Vivek V Dhawan; Ganesh V Joshi; Ankitkumar S Jain; Yuvraj P Nikam; Rajiv P Gude; Rita Mulherkar; Mangal S Nagarsenker Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 6.730
Authors: Gracia García-García; Fátima Fernández-Álvarez; Laura Cabeza; Ángel V Delgado; Consolación Melguizo; José C Prados; José L Arias Journal: Polymers (Basel) Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 4.329