Literature DB >> 24081743

Application of a benthic observed/expected-type model for assessing Central Appalachian streams influenced by regional stressors in West Virginia and Kentucky.

Gregory J Pond1, Sheila H North.   

Abstract

Stream bioassessments rely on taxonomic composition at sites compared with natural, reference conditions. We developed and tested an observed/expected (O/E) predictive model of taxonomic completeness and an index of compositional dissimilarity (BC index) for Central Appalachian streams using combined macroinvertebrate datasets from riffle habitats in West Virginia (WV) and Kentucky (KY). A total of 102 reference sites were used to calibrate the O/E model, which was then applied to assess over 1,200 sites sampled over a 10-year period. Using an all subsets discriminant function analysis (DFA) procedure, we tested combinations of 14 predictor variables that produced DF and O/E models of varying performance. We selected the most precise model using a probability of capture at >0.5 (O/E₀.₅, SD = 0.159); this model was constructed with only three simple predictor variables--Julian day, latitude, and whether a site was in ecoregion 69a. We evaluated O/E and BC indices between reference and test sites and compared their response to regional stressors, including coal mining, residential development, and acid deposition. The Central Appalachian O/E and BC indices both showed excellent discriminatory power and were significantly correlated to a variety of regional stressors; in some instances, the BC index was slightly more sensitive and responsive than the O/E₀.₅ model. These indices can be used to supplement existing bioassessment tools crucial to detecting and diagnosing stream impacts in the Central Appalachian region of WV and KY.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24081743     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-013-3253-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  6 in total

1.  Cumulative impacts of mountaintop mining on an Appalachian watershed.

Authors:  T Ty Lindberg; Emily S Bernhardt; Raven Bier; A M Helton; R Brittany Merola; Avner Vengosh; Richard T Di Giulio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  How many mountains can we mine? Assessing the regional degradation of Central Appalachian rivers by surface coal mining.

Authors:  Emily S Bernhardt; Brian D Lutz; Ryan S King; John P Fay; Catherine E Carter; Ashley M Helton; David Campagna; John Amos
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Quantifying biological integrity by taxonomic completeness: its utility in regional and global assessments.

Authors:  Charles P Hawkins
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition.

Authors:  John L Stoddard; David P Larsen; Charles P Hawkins; Richard K Johnson; Richard H Norris
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Calibration and validation of a regionally and seasonally stratified macroinvertebrate index for West Virginia wadeable streams.

Authors:  Gregory J Pond; Jeffrey E Bailey; Benjamin M Lowman; Michael J Whitman
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Science and regulation. Mountaintop mining consequences.

Authors:  M A Palmer; E S Bernhardt; W H Schlesinger; K N Eshleman; E Foufoula-Georgiou; M S Hendryx; A D Lemly; G E Likens; O L Loucks; M E Power; P S White; P R Wilcock
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 47.728

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Long-term impacts on macroinvertebrates downstream of reclaimed mountaintop mining valley fills in Central Appalachia.

Authors:  Gregory J Pond; Margaret E Passmore; Nancy D Pointon; John K Felbinger; Craig A Walker; Kelly J G Krock; Jennifer B Fulton; Whitney L Nash
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Adequacy of sample size for estimating a value from field observational data.

Authors:  Susan M Cormier; Glenn W Suter; Mark B Fernandez; Lei Zheng
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 6.291

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.