Literature DB >> 2408106

An integrated approach to the evaluation of metastatic bone disease.

R I Gold1, L L Seeger, L W Bassett, R J Steckel.   

Abstract

The radionuclide bone scan is the most effective whole body screening test for bone metastases. Conventional radiography, although relatively insensitive to the presence of bone metastases, is the best modality for characterizing them once they are detected in radionuclide scans. When the radionuclide bone scan and appropriate correlative radiographs are analyzed and reported together, false-positive scan findings are reduced, and scan specificity is increased. Valuable information on response to treatment may be obtained by correlating the changes seen in radiographs and radionuclide bone scans. CT or MR imaging may be useful for evaluating suspicious radionuclide bone scan findings that cannot be explained radiographically, and may influence the decision regarding the need for biopsy. CT can also be used to monitor needle-biopsy procedures. The use of CT or MR imaging is helpful in determining the local extent of metastatic disease when planning palliative surgery or radiotherapy. Although a positive diagnosis by needle biopsy is considered definitive, a negative result must be suspect and may eventually necessitate open surgical biopsy. An algorithmic approach to the workup of a possible skeletal metastasis is illustrated in Figure 12.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2408106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0033-8389            Impact factor:   2.303


  13 in total

1.  Bone metastasis in gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Jae Bong Ahn; Tae Kyung Ha; Sung Joon Kwon
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.720

2.  Vena cava filters.

Authors:  J N King; A M Champlin; R N Ashby
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-03

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal tumors.

Authors:  R D Boutin; M R Williamson
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-03

4.  Bone metastasis as the first sign of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Wafa Ben Ameur; Safa Belghali; Imen Akkari; Houneida Zaghouani; Elyes Bouajina; Elhem Ben Jazia
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2017-09-29

5.  Acrometastases to the hand in stomach carcinoma: a rare entity.

Authors:  Ashok Kumar
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-08-10

Review 6.  Whole-body diffusion-weighted and proton imaging: a review of this emerging technology for monitoring metastatic cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Jacobs; Li Pan; Katarzyna J Macura
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.800

7.  Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for detecting bone metastases: comparison with bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  G Cascini; C Falcone; C Greco; B Bertucci; S Cipullo; O Tamburrini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 8.  Medical treatment of tumor-induced hypercalcemia and tumor-induced osteolysis: challenges for future research.

Authors:  J J Body
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging and scintigraphy in patients with metastatic breast cancer of the axial skeleton: a comparative study.

Authors:  Mehmet Halit Yilmaz; Mustafa Ozguroglu; Devrim Mert; Hande Turna; Gökhan Demir; Ibrahim Adaletli; Sila Ulus; Metin Halac; Kaya Kanberoğlu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Differentiation of malignant and degenerative bone lesions using dexamethasone interventional 3- and 24-hour bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  A Bhatnagar; A Mondal; R Kashyap; R K Sharma; R Sharma; S K Chakravarty; V Bihari; K Sawroop; M K Chopra; N L Soni
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.