Literature DB >> 24079714

A feasible strategy of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for carriers with chromosomal translocation: Using blastocyst biopsy and array comparative genomic hybridization.

Chu-Chun Huang1, Li-Jung Chang, Yi-Yi Tsai, Chia-Cheng Hung, Mei-Ya Fang, Yi-Ning Su, Hsin-Fu Chen, Shee-Uan Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Patients with chromosomal translocation are highly vulnerable to produce unbalanced gametes that result in recurrent miscarriages, affected offspring, or infertility. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) with blastomere biopsy and fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) has been used to select normal/balanced embryos for transfer. However, FISH is inherent with some technical difficulties such as cell fixation and signal reading. Here we introduce a strategy of PGD using blastocyst biopsy and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for reproductive problems of patients with chromosomal translocation.
METHODS: Twelve patients diagnosed as having chromosomal translocation who underwent PGD cycles were included in this single-center observational study. Blastocyst biopsy was performed and biopsied blastocysts were cryopreserved individually. Testing was performed with aCGH, and the euploid embryos were transferred in the following thawing cycles.
RESULTS: The overall diagnostic efficiency was 90.2% (55/61) and the euploidy rate was 32.7% (18/55). Ten cycles of thawed embryo transfer (ET) were carried out, resulting in three live births and another three ongoing pregnancies with an ongoing pregnancy rate of 60%/transfer cycle. The prenatal diagnosis with chorionic villi sampling confirmed the results of PGD/aCGH in all six pregnant women. No miscarriage happened in our case series.
CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates an effective PGD strategy with promising outcomes. Blastocyst biopsy can retrieve more genetic material and may provide more reliable results, and aCGH offers not only detection of chromosomal translocation but also more comprehensive analysis of 24 chromosomes than traditional FISH. More cases are needed to verify our results and this strategy might be considered in general clinical practice.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH); blastocyst biopsy; chromosomal translocation; infertility; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD)

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24079714     DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2013.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc        ISSN: 0929-6646            Impact factor:   3.282


  8 in total

1.  Two different microarray technologies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening, due to reciprocal translocation imbalances, demonstrate equivalent euploidy and clinical pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Kyle J Tobler; Paul R Brezina; Andrew T Benner; Luke Du; Xin Xu; William G Kearns
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Assessing morphokinetic parameters via time lapse microscopy (TLM) to predict euploidy: are aneuploidy risk classification models universal?

Authors:  Yael G Kramer; Jason D Kofinas; Katherine Melzer; Nicole Noyes; Caroline McCaffrey; Julia Buldo-Licciardi; David H McCulloh; James A Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Identification of mosaic and segmental aneuploidies by next-generation sequencing in preimplantation genetic screening can improve clinical outcomes compared to array-comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Hsing-Hua Lai; Tzu-Hsuan Chuang; Lin-Kin Wong; Meng-Ju Lee; Chia-Lin Hsieh; Huai-Lin Wang; Shee-Uan Chen
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  The establishment and application of preimplantation genetic haplotyping in embryo diagnosis for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocation carriers.

Authors:  Shuo Zhang; Caixia Lei; Junping Wu; Jing Zhou; Haiyan Sun; Jing Fu; Yijuan Sun; Xiaoxi Sun; Daru Lu; Yueping Zhang
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.063

5.  BasePhasing: a highly efficient approach for preimplantation genetic haplotyping in clinical application of balanced translocation carriers.

Authors:  Shuo Zhang; Dingding Zhao; Jun Zhang; Yan Mao; Lingyin Kong; Yueping Zhang; Bo Liang; Xiaoxi Sun; Congjian Xu
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.063

Review 6.  Current status of comprehensive chromosome screening for elective single-embryo transfer.

Authors:  Ming-Yih Wu; Kuang-Han Chao; Chin-Der Chen; Li-Jung Chang; Shee-Uan Chen; Yu-Shih Yang
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2014-06-01

7.  Concordance between different trophectoderm biopsy sites and the inner cell mass of chromosomal composition measured with a next-generation sequencing platform.

Authors:  Tzu-Hsuan Chuang; Jhih-Yuan Hsieh; Meng-Ju Lee; Hsing-Hua Lai; Chia-Lin Hsieh; Huai-Lin Wang; Yu-Jen Chang; Shee-Uan Chen
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 8.  The potential use of microRNAs as a therapeutic strategy for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors:  Jiulue Hu; Jelena Stojanović; Saman Yasamineh; Pooneh Yasamineh; Sathish Kumar Karuppannan; Mohammed Junaid Hussain Dowlath; Hamed Serati-Nouri
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.574

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.