Literature DB >> 24078642

Variation in intravenous iron use internationally and over time: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).

George R Bailie1, Maria Larkina, David A Goodkin, Yun Li, Ronald L Pisoni, Brian Bieber, Nancy Mason, Lin Tong, Francesco Locatelli, Mark R Marshall, Masaki Inaba, Bruce M Robinson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To examine patterns of intravenous (IV) iron use across 12 countries from 1999 to 2011.
METHODS: Trends in iron use are described among 32 192 hemodialysis (HD) patients in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Adjusted associations of IV iron dose with serum ferritin and transferrin saturation (TSAT) values were also studied.
RESULTS: IV iron was administered to 50% of patients over 4 months in 1999, increasing to 71% during 2009-11, with increasing use in most countries. Among patients receiving IV iron, the mean monthly dose increased from 232 ± 167 to 281 ± 211 mg. Most countries used 3 to 4 doses/month, but Canada used about 2 doses/month, Italy increased from 3 to almost 6 doses/month and Germany used 5 to 6 doses/month. The USA and most European countries predominantly used iron sucrose and sodium ferric gluconate. A significant use of iron dextran was limited to Canada and France; iron polymaltose was used in Australia and New Zealand; and Japan used ferric oxide saccharate, chondroitin polysulfate iron complex and cideferron. Ferritin values rose in most countries: 22% of patients had ≥ 800 ng/mL in the recent years of study. TSAT levels increased to a lesser degree over time. Japan had much lower IV iron dosing and ferritin levels, but similar TSAT levels. In adjusted analyses, serum ferritin and TSAT levels increased signifcantly by 14 ng/mL and 0.16%, respectively, for every 100 mg/month higher mean monthly iron dose.
CONCLUSIONS: IV iron prescription patterns varied between countries and changed over time from 1999 to 2011. IV iron use and dose increased in most countries, with notable increases in ferritin but not TSAT levels. With rising cumulative IV iron doses, studies of the effects of changing IV iron dosing and other anemia management practices on clinical outcomes should be a high priority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hemodialysis; international trends; intravenous iron; iron stores; prescription patterns

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24078642     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gft062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  35 in total

1.  Effectiveness of Switch to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA) Biosimilars versus Maintenance of ESA Originators in the Real-Life Setting: Matched-Control Study in Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Roberto Minutolo; Piergiorgio Bolasco; Paolo Chiodini; Stefano Sposini; Maurizio Borzumati; Cataldo Abaterusso; Alessandra A Mele; Domenico Santoro; Valeria Canale; Alberto Santoboni; Oliviero Filiberti; Fulvio Fiorini; Carlo Mura; Patrizio Imperiali; Silvio Borrelli; Luigi Russo; Luca De Nicola; Domenico Russo
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Authors' Reply.

Authors:  Iain C Macdougall; Ian Ford
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  The unexpected presence of iron in bone biopsies of hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Melani R Custodio; Rosilene M Elias; Wagner D Velasquez; Luciene M Dos Reis; Ivone B Oliveira; Rosa M A Moysés; Aluizio B Carvalho; Vanda Jorgetti
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Testing two (of several) intravenous iron dosing strategies in hemodialysis.

Authors:  Margaret K Yu; Glenn M Chertow
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

5.  Safety of Intravenous Iron in Dialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ingrid Hougen; David Collister; Mathieu Bourrier; Thomas Ferguson; Laura Hochheim; Paul Komenda; Claudio Rigatto; Navdeep Tangri
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Intravenous Iron Dosing and Infection Risk in Patients on Hemodialysis: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the PIVOTAL Trial.

Authors:  Iain C Macdougall; Sunil Bhandari; Claire White; Stefan D Anker; Kenneth Farrington; Philip A Kalra; Patrick B Mark; John J V McMurray; Chante Reid; Michele Robertson; Charles R V Tomson; David C Wheeler; Christopher G Winearls; Ian Ford
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  Selenium Associates With Response to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Minoru Yasukawa; Shigeyuki Arai; Michito Nagura; Ryo Kido; Shinichiro Asakawa; Daigoro Hirohama; Osamu Yamazaki; Yoshifuru Tamura; Michitaka Fujimaki; Sawako Kobayashi; Masakazu Mimaki; Hiroko Kodama; Shunya Uchida; Yoshihide Fujigaki; Shigeru Shibata
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2022-04-16

8.  Cumulative iron dose and resistance to erythropoietin.

Authors:  A Rosati; C Tetta; J I Merello; I Palomares; R Perez-Garcia; F Maduell; B Canaud; P Aljama Garcia
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.902

9.  Randomized Trial Comparing Proactive, High-Dose versus Reactive, Low-Dose Intravenous Iron Supplementation in Hemodialysis (PIVOTAL): Study Design and Baseline Data.

Authors:  Iain C Macdougall; Claire White; Stefan D Anker; Sunil Bhandari; Kenneth Farrington; Philip A Kalra; John J V McMurray; Heather Murray; Retha Steenkamp; Charles R V Tomson; David C Wheeler; Christopher G Winearls; Ian Ford
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.754

10.  Thresholds of iron markers for iron deficiency erythropoiesis-finding of the Japanese nationwide dialysis registry.

Authors:  Takayuki Hamano; Naohiko Fujii; Terumasa Hayashi; Hiroyasu Yamamoto; Kunitoshi Iseki; Yoshiharu Tsubakihara
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl (2011)       Date:  2015-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.