Literature DB >> 2407862

Sonographic fetal growth standards. Are current data applicable to a racially mixed population?

F P Hadlock1, R B Harrist, Y P Shah, R S Sharman, S K Park.   

Abstract

Currently available sonographic growth standards for fetal head size, abdominal size, and limb length are based primarily on studies from white populations. To determine whether these published standards are appropriate for a racially mixed, indigent population, we compared our published data from a middle-class white population with data generated from a black/Hispanic population seen at a county hospital in Houston, Texas. No statistically significant differences were found for any of the following fetal sonographic parameters (20 to 41 weeks): biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur length.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2407862     DOI: 10.7863/jum.1990.9.3.157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  3 in total

1.  Comment on "Compromised birth outcomes and infant mortality among racial and ethnic groups".

Authors:  W J van der Veen
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1998-11

2.  Birth outcome, not pregnancy process: reply to van der Veen.

Authors:  W P Frisbie; D Forbes; R A Hummer; S G Pullum
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1998-11

Review 3.  Individualized growth assessment: conceptual framework and practical implementation for the evaluation of fetal growth and neonatal growth outcome.

Authors:  Russell L Deter; Wesley Lee; Lami Yeo; Offer Erez; Uma Ramamurthy; Medha Naik; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 8.661

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.