Literature DB >> 24077903

In Defence of Professional Judgement.

Robin Downie1, Jane Macnaughton.   

Abstract

A judgement is an assertion made with evidence or good reason in a context of uncertainty. In psychiatry the uncertainty is inherent in the professional context, and the evidence derives from the academic literature and scientific studies as they are applied to a specific patient. The nature of the uncertainty and the factors which should inform professional judgement are explored. Professional judgement is currently facing two serious challenges: an obsession with numbers, which comes from within medicine, and the 'patient choice' agenda, which is politically inspired and comes from outside medicine. This paper strives to defend professional judgement in the clinic against both challenges.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24077903      PMCID: PMC3784818          DOI: 10.1192/apt.bp.108.005926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Psychiatr Treat        ISSN: 1355-5146


  4 in total

1.  Choice.

Authors:  Paul Bate; Glenn Robert
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-12-24

2.  Teaching medical students professionalism: what role for the medical humanities?

Authors:  Richard Meakin
Journal:  Med Humanit       Date:  2007-12

3.  Choice and responsibility in the NHS.

Authors:  Robin Downie; Fiona Randall
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.659

4.  Factors that influence the patient centredness of a consultation.

Authors:  S A Law; N Britten
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.386

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Performance of the Safer Nursing Care Tool to measure nurse staffing requirements in acute hospitals: a multicentre observational study.

Authors:  Peter Griffiths; Christina Saville; Jane Ball; David Culliford; Natalie Pattison; Thomas Monks
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.