Literature DB >> 24077779

Clinical and radiographical results after double flip button stabilization of acute grade III and IV acromioclavicular joint separations.

Michael C Glanzmann, Stefan Buchmann, Laurent Audigé, Christoph Kolling, Matthias Flury.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Persistent horizontal instability after acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint separation may provoke unsatisfactory results of conservative treatment. HYPOTHESIS: the arthroscopically assisted double flip button stabilization of acute horizontally unstable grade III and IV AC joint disruptions results in full functional restoration and stable radiological reposition. MATERIALS: 21 patients treated for an acute grade III or IV AC joint separation were enrolled. Clinical assessment at least 2-year postoperative included the constant score (CS) and the simple shoulder test. A panorama stress view, bilateral axial view and an AC view were obtained for radiographic evaluation.
RESULTS: 19 individuals (mean 37 years; 17 men) with 16 Rockwood type III and 3 type IV injuries were available for examination 24–51 months postoperatively. The mean CS was 90.2 points (SD 6.5) with no statistically significant difference between CS and age-adjusted normative values. The mean Simple Shoulder Test scored 11.5 points (range 8–12). Loss of reduction of more than 2 mm in the coronal plane stress views was present in 6 patients (32 %) with no associated loss of functional outcome. Two of four reported complications in four patients were treated surgically (one open revision with graft augmentation for coracoid implant break out, one arthroscopic capsular release for persistent glenohumeral stiffness).
CONCLUSION: Arthroscopically assisted double flip button stabilization for acute grade III and IV AC joint separation restores fully horizontal stability and age-expected shoulder function, resulting in high patient satisfaction, despite a loss of reduction observed radiographically in approximately one-third of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24077779     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-013-1858-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  9 in total

1.  Current state of treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint injuries in Germany: is there a difference between specialists and non-specialists? A survey of German trauma and orthopaedic departments.

Authors:  Maurice Balke; Marco M Schneider; Sven Shafizadeh; Holger Bäthis; Bertil Bouillon; Marc Banerjee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Acromioclavicular joint augmentation at the time of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction fails to improve functional outcomes despite significantly improved horizontal stability.

Authors:  Robert W Jordan; Shahbaz Malik; Kieran Bentick; Adnan Saithna
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Sports activity after anatomic acromioclavicular joint stabilisation with flip-button technique.

Authors:  Felix Porschke; Marc Schnetzke; Sara Aytac; Stefan Studier-Fischer; Paul Alfred Gruetzner; Thorsten Guehring
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  A comparison between two double-button endoscopically assisted surgical techniques for the treatment acute acromioclavicular dislocations.

Authors:  P Vulliet; M Le Hanneur; V Cladiere; P Loriaut; P Boyer
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-08-31

5.  The prevalence of intraarticular associated lesions after acute acromioclavicular joint injuries is 20%. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Ruiz Ibán; Miguel Santiago Moreno Romero; Jorge Diaz Heredia; Raquel Ruiz Díaz; Alfonso Muriel; Jesus López-Alcalde
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Comparing mini-open and arthroscopic acromioclavicular joint repair: functional results and return to sport.

Authors:  M Faggiani; G P Vasario; L Mattei; M J Calò; F Castoldi
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-06-10

7.  The Role of the Trapezius in Stabilization of the Acromioclavicular Joint: A Biomechanical Evaluation.

Authors:  Maxwell T Trudeau; Jonathan J Peters; Benjamin C Hawthorne; Ian J Wellington; Matthew R LeVasseur; Michael R Mancini; Elifho Obopilwe; Giovanni Di Giacomo; Simone Cerciello; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-09-26

8.  Rockwood Grade-III Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Treatment Options.

Authors:  Sreten Franovic; Alex Pietroski; Noah Kuhlmann; Talal Bazzi; Yang Zhou; Stephanie Muh
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-05-04

Review 9.  Complications following arthroscopic fixation of acromioclavicular separations: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Jarret M Woodmass; John G Esposito; Yohei Ono; Atiba A Nelson; Richard S Boorman; Gail M Thornton; Ian Ky Lo
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2015-04-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.