Literature DB >> 24077758

Assessing patient-oriented results after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Clemens Baier, Christian Lüring, Jens Schaumburger, Franz Köck, Johannes Beckmann, Markus Tingart, Florian Zeman, Joachim Grifka, Hans-Robert Springorum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Revision total knee arthroplasties (TKA) have been performed with increasing frequency over the last 25 years.
METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 78 patients who underwent 78 revision TKAs during the years 2003–2007 with an average follow-up of 81 months (range 60–108 months). All patients were treated with a standard rotating hinge prosthesis (TC3, DePuy, Warsaw, IN, USA) due to significant instability. We evaluated the postoperative results using the Knee Society clinical rating system and the WOMAC rating system.
RESULTS: Clinical results revealed significant improvements in both scores. Complications occurred in almost one-third of the cases, with a reoperation rate of 26 %.
CONCLUSION: Our mid-term findings show that revision TKAs lead to an improvement in patient-perceived outcomes of physical variables. While revision TKA is a useful option for patients, procedure-associated complications should not be neglected. During the course of the procedure, it is important to collect patient-oriented data and focus on responsive and valid scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24077758     DOI: 10.1007/s00776-013-0467-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  7 in total

Review 1.  Rotating hinge prosthesis for complex revision total knee arthroplasty: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Shalen Kouk; Parthiv A Rathod; Aditya V Maheshwari; Ajit J Deshmukh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-12-05

2.  Hemovac blood after total knee arthroplasty as a source of stem cells.

Authors:  Seon Ae Kim; Ho Youn Park; Yong-Woon Shin; Eun Jeong Go; Young Ju Kim; Yoo Chang Kim; Asode Ananthram Shetty; Seok Jung Kim
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-11

3.  Outcomes of the rotating hinge knee in revision total knee arthroplasty with a median follow-up of 6.2 years.

Authors:  Jake von Hintze; Mika Niemeläinen; Harri Sintonen; Jyrki Nieminen; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 4.  Patient-reported outcome measures following revision knee replacement: a review of PROM instrument utilisation and measurement properties using the COSMIN checklist.

Authors:  Shiraz A Sabah; Elizabeth A Hedge; Simon G F Abram; Abtin Alvand; Andrew J Price; Sally Hopewell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Implant survivorship, functional outcomes and complications with the use of rotating hinge knee implants: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joshua Xu; Lennart von Fritsch; Shiraz A Sabah; Andrew J Price; Abtin Alvand
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-04

6.  Age, gender, functional KSS, reason for revision and type of bone defect predict functional outcome 5 years after revision total knee arthroplasty: a multivariable prediction model.

Authors:  Jan F M Verbeek; Gerjon Hannink; Koen C Defoort; Ate B Wymenga; Petra J C Heesterbeek
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  High ten-year implant survivorship and low patellofemoral complication rate for S-ROM rotating-hinge implants in revision total knee arthroplasty : a single-centre study.

Authors:  Hosam E Matar; Benjamin V Bloch; Peter J James
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.