BACKGROUND: The incidence of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer continues to increase. To detect lesions at an earlier phase in their progression, skin cancer screening programs have been advocated by some. However, the effectiveness of skin cancer screening and the ideal population that these screenings should target have yet to be firmly established. This study details the relationship of a group of well-known risk factors with presumptive diagnoses in a large series of individuals self-referred for free skin cancer screening. METHODS: Data obtained during 2007 to 2010 from a descriptive cross-sectional study skin cancer screening program are presented. Participant history was recorded using standardized medical history forms prior to skin examination. Screeners conducted a skin examination varying from whole-body to limited areas (per participant preference) and recorded diagnoses. Diagnoses were assigned to the nonmelanoma cancer (NMC) or suspicious pigmented lesion group for analysis. RESULTS: A presumptive diagnosis of NMC was associated with male sex, age ≥ 50 years, personal history of skin cancer, lower skin phototype, increased sunscreen use, and increased chronic sun exposure (all P values ≤ .0001). After controlling for skin phototype, increased sunscreen use was not associated with a presumptive diagnosis of NMC (P = .96). Presumptive diagnosis of a suspicious pigmented lesion was associated with a reported history of "changing mole" (P < .0001) and negatively associated with age ≥ 50 years (P < .0001) and a personal history of skin cancer (P = .0119). CONCLUSIONS: Several known risk factors for nonmelanoma skin cancer correlated with a presumptive diagnosis of NMC. The yield of presumptive atypical pigmented lesions was increased in participants aged < 50 years, supporting the notion that this population may benefit from screening.
BACKGROUND: The incidence of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer continues to increase. To detect lesions at an earlier phase in their progression, skin cancer screening programs have been advocated by some. However, the effectiveness of skin cancer screening and the ideal population that these screenings should target have yet to be firmly established. This study details the relationship of a group of well-known risk factors with presumptive diagnoses in a large series of individuals self-referred for free skin cancer screening. METHODS: Data obtained during 2007 to 2010 from a descriptive cross-sectional study skin cancer screening program are presented. Participant history was recorded using standardized medical history forms prior to skin examination. Screeners conducted a skin examination varying from whole-body to limited areas (per participant preference) and recorded diagnoses. Diagnoses were assigned to the nonmelanoma cancer (NMC) or suspicious pigmented lesion group for analysis. RESULTS: A presumptive diagnosis of NMC was associated with male sex, age ≥ 50 years, personal history of skin cancer, lower skin phototype, increased sunscreen use, and increased chronic sun exposure (all P values ≤ .0001). After controlling for skin phototype, increased sunscreen use was not associated with a presumptive diagnosis of NMC (P = .96). Presumptive diagnosis of a suspicious pigmented lesion was associated with a reported history of "changing mole" (P < .0001) and negatively associated with age ≥ 50 years (P < .0001) and a personal history of skin cancer (P = .0119). CONCLUSIONS: Several known risk factors for nonmelanoma skin cancer correlated with a presumptive diagnosis of NMC. The yield of presumptive atypical pigmented lesions was increased in participants aged < 50 years, supporting the notion that this population may benefit from screening.
Authors: Howard W Rogers; Martin A Weinstock; Ashlynne R Harris; Michael R Hinckley; Steven R Feldman; Alan B Fleischer; Brett M Coldiron Journal: Arch Dermatol Date: 2010-03
Authors: Catherine M Olsen; Michael S Zens; Adele C Green; Therese A Stukel; C D'Arcy J Holman; Thomas Mack; J Mark Elwood; Elizabeth A Holly; Carlotta Sacerdote; Richard Gallagher; Anthony J Swerdlow; Bruce K Armstrong; Stefano Rosso; Connie Kirkpatrick; Roberto Zanetti; Julia Newton Bishop; Veronique Bataille; Yu-Mei Chang; Rona Mackie; Anne Østerlind; Marianne Berwick; Margaret R Karagas; David C Whiteman Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2010-11-16 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: P Autier; J F Doré; A C Reis; A Grivegnée; L Ollivaud; F Truchetet; E Chamoun; N Rotmensz; G Severi; J P Césarini Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Rebecca I Hartman; Yun Xue; Ryan Karmouta; Elizabeth Tkachenko; Sara J Li; David G Li; Cara Joyce; Arash Mostaghimi Journal: Dermatol Res Pract Date: 2022-08-16