Literature DB >> 24077246

Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity assessment using novel cuff-based techniques: comparison with tonometric measurement.

Mark Butlin1, Ahmad Qasem, Francesca Battista, Erwan Bozec, Carmel M McEniery, Eugénie Millet-Amaury, Giacomo Pucci, Ian B Wilkinson, Giuseppe Schillaci, Pierre Boutouyrie, Alberto P Avolio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, a predictor of cardiovascular outcome, is conventionally measured using a tonometer sequentially placed upon the carotid and femoral arteries, gated using an electrocardiogram. Leg cuff detection of the femoral pulse removes the need for signal gating, reduces the time required for a single measurement, but gives different pulse wave velocity values to tonometric analysis. A novel algorithm to correct for the transit time and distance related to the additional femoral segment was applied to the cuff-based approach in this study.
METHOD: Eighty-eight individuals were recruited across four centres and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity measured in triplicate using two operators with both a tonometer-based device and a device using an inflated thigh cuff with and without the use of the novel algorithm. Comparison was made by Bland-Altman and regression analysis.
RESULTS: The unadjusted cuff-based approach gave lower pulse wave velocity values than the tonometer-based approach (6.11 ± 1.27 and 7.02 ± 1.88 m/s, P < 0.001). With application of the algorithm, the cuff-based device gave similar pulse wave velocity values (7.04 ± 1.72 m/s) as the tonometer-based approach (P = 0.86). Analysis of covariance with age showed a difference between the tonometer and cuff-based methods (P < 0.001), with a dependence upon age (P = 0.004). The adjusted cuff-based method gave similar results to the tonometer-based method (P = 0.94), with no dependence upon age (P = 0.46).
CONCLUSION: This study provided validation of a cuff-based assessment of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity against the universally accepted tonometric method. Adjusting the cuff-based method for the additional femoral segment measured gives results comparable to the tonometer-based method, for which the majority of population data exist to date.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24077246     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328363c789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  26 in total

1.  Validation of a cuff-based device for measuring carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Tommy Y Cai; Alice Meroni; Hasthi Dissanayake; Melinda Phang; Alberto Avolio; David S Celermajer; Mark Butlin; Michael R Skilton; Ahmad Qasem
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 2.  Large Artery Stiffness Assessment Using SphygmoCor Technology.

Authors:  Mark Butlin; Ahmad Qasem
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-01

3.  Effects of mandibular advancement device treatment on arterial stiffness and glucose metabolism in patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea: a prospective 1 year study.

Authors:  Tea Galic; Josko Bozic; Natalija Ivkovic; Grgo Gunjaca; Tina Kurir Ticinovic; Zoran Dogas
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 4.  Arterial Stiffness in Hypertension: an Update.

Authors:  Korshie Dumor; Michael Shoemaker-Moyle; Ravi Nistala; Adam Whaley-Connell
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Quantification of aortic stiffness using magnetic resonance elastography: Measurement reproducibility, pulse wave velocity comparison, changes over cardiac cycle, and relationship with age.

Authors:  William E Kenyhercz; Brian Raterman; Venkata Sita Priyanka Illapani; Joshua Dowell; Xiaokui Mo; Richard D White; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Performance assessment of Pulse Wave Imaging using conventional ultrasound in canine aortas ex vivo and normal human arteries in vivo.

Authors:  Ronny X Li; William Qaqish; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Artery Res       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 0.597

7.  Heart rate reduction decreases central blood pressure in sick sinus syndrome patients with a permanent cardiac pacemaker.

Authors:  Tuuli Teeäär; Martin Serg; Kaido Paapstel; Jaak Kals; Mart Kals; Mihkel Zilmer; Jaan Eha; Priit Kampus
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.012

8.  Recommendations for Improving and Standardizing Vascular Research on Arterial Stiffness: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Raymond R Townsend; Ian B Wilkinson; Ernesto L Schiffrin; Alberto P Avolio; Julio A Chirinos; John R Cockcroft; Kevin S Heffernan; Edward G Lakatta; Carmel M McEniery; Gary F Mitchell; Samer S Najjar; Wilmer W Nichols; Elaine M Urbina; Thomas Weber
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Personalized physiologic flow waveforms improve wave reflection estimates compared to triangular flow waveforms in adults.

Authors:  Ninette Shenouda; Joseph M Stock; Jordan C Patik; Julio A Chirinos; David G Edwards
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.733

10.  Comparing the Heart-Thigh and Thigh-Ankle Arteries with the Heart-Ankle Arterial Segment for Arterial Stiffness Measurements.

Authors:  Manami Watahiki; Shigeo Horinaka; Toshihiko Ishimitsu; Shigeru Toyoda; Teruo Inoue
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2020-12-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.