Literature DB >> 24077245

Differences between office and ambulatory blood pressures in children and adolescents attending a hospital hypertension clinic.

Patrizia Salice1, Gianluigi Ardissino, Paolo Barbier, Laura Bacà, Daniela Li Vecchi, Silvia Ghiglia, Anna M Colli, Maria A Galli, Giuseppina Marra, Sara Testa, Alberto Edefonti, Fabio Magrini, Alberto Zanchetti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Information on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in children is scarce. While in adults office BP (OBP) is higher than ABP and the difference increases as OBP increases, information in children suggests that at this young age ABP is no lower and often higher than OBP. This study was aimed at describing OBP-ABP differences in a cohort of children of different ages and BPs, and investigating whether OBP-ABP differences are dependent on age or OBP level.
METHODS: We retrospectively compared OBP and 24-h, daytime and night-time ABP in 433 children and adolescents aged 4-18 years, referred to our hospital clinic.
RESULTS: OBP was found to be significantly lower than 24-h and daytime ABP in the low age tertile (4-10 years) but not in the medium and high tertiles. OBP was also lower than ABP in normotensive patients (n = 182), but higher than ABP in untreated hypertensive patients (n = 92) despite similar ages. Continuous analyses showed a weak correlation of OBP-ABP differences with age, and a much stronger correlation with OBP so that 24-h ABP was higher than OBP at OBP values less than 117/73 mmHg and lower than OBP at higher OBP values. Logistic regression analysis indicates that also in children OBP accounts for most of the OBP-ABP difference.
CONCLUSION: There is a common relation both in children and adults between OBP and ABP. It is only because high OBP is common in the elderly, and the lowest OBP is usually found in young children that large positive OBP-ABP differences have been associated with old age, and negative differences with childhood. OBP-ABP differences, often defined as white-coat effect, can have different directions and are likely to be largely due to regression to the mean.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24077245     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283643361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  8 in total

1.  Clinical predictors and impact of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pediatric hypertension referrals.

Authors:  Marguerite L Davis; Michael A Ferguson; Justin P Zachariah
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2014-06-02

2.  Using simplified blood pressure tables to avoid underdiagnosing childhood hypertension.

Authors:  Ajay P Sharma; Javed Mohammed; Benson Thomas; Ram N Singh; Guido Filler
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2015 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is recommended in the clinical management of children with a solitary functioning kidney.

Authors:  Rik Westland; Michiel F Schreuder; David F van der Lof; Annemieke Vermeulen; Inge M J Dekker-van der Meer; Arend Bökenkamp; Joanna A E van Wijk
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 4.  Blood pressure (BP) assessment-from BP level to BP variability.

Authors:  Janusz Feber; Mieczyslaw Litwin
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Correlation between hypertrophy and risk of hypertension in congenital solitary functioning kidney.

Authors:  Elisa Zambaiti; Maria Sergio; Fabio Baldanza; Ciro Corrado; Maria Rita Di Pace; Marcello Cimador
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  The diagnostic value of supine blood pressure in hypertension.

Authors:  Paweł Krzesiński; Adam Stańczyk; Grzegorz Gielerak; Katarzyna Piotrowicz; Małgorzata Banak; Agnieszka Wójcik
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 7.  Novelty in hypertension in children and adolescents: focus on hypertension during the first year of life, use and interpretation of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, role of physical activity in prevention and treatment, simple carbohydrates and uric acid as risk factors.

Authors:  Mirella Strambi; Marco Giussani; Maria Amalia Ambruzzi; Paolo Brambilla; Ciro Corrado; Ugo Giordano; Claudio Maffeis; Silvio Maringhin; Maria Chiara Matteucci; Ettore Menghetti; Patrizia Salice; Federico Schena; Pietro Strisciuglio; Giuliana Valerio; Francesca Viazzi; Raffaele Virdis; Simonetta Genovesi
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 2.638

8.  Risk Factors in Adolescent Hypertension.

Authors:  D Rose Ewald; Lauren A Haldeman PhD
Journal:  Glob Pediatr Health       Date:  2016-02-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.