Literature DB >> 24077203

Evaluation of prognostic predictors of percutaneous adhesiolysis using a Racz catheter for post lumbar surgery syndrome or spinal stenosis.

Eunjoo Choi1, Francis Sahngun Nahm, Pyung-Bok Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous adhesiolysis (PA) is considered to be a reasonable nonoperative treatment for herniation of intervertebral disc (HIVD), spinal stenosis, and post-lumbar-surgery syndrome (PLSS). The success of PA depends on the removal of epidural fibrosis and drug delivery to the target region. However, prognostic predictors of the effects of PA are not well known.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic predictors of PA using a Racz catheter for patients with PLSS or spinal stenosis. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective assessment.
METHODS: PA using a Racz catheter was performed on 78 patients. We assessed the effectiveness of PA at pretreatment, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months following the procedure. Effectiveness was defined as a 50% or more reduction of the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for back and leg pain or a 40% or more reduction of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) following the procedure. Data collected for each patient included age, gender, BMI, grade and location of stenosis in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), symptom durations, and history of previous lumbar surgery. The adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each variable were analyzed by logistic regression.
RESULTS: PA using a Racz catheter was more effective in patients with no previous lumbar surgery (OR, 7.426; 95% CI, 1.820-30.302; P = 0.005) or root compression with HIVD or foraminal stenosis (OR, 5.479; 95% CI, 1.137-26.391; P = 0.036). Other included factors were not related to PA effectiveness. LIMITATIONS: The number of patients examined in this study was relatively small.
CONCLUSION: Good prognostic predictors were identified as no previous lumbar surgery or root compression with HIVD or foraminal stenosis. These results are expected to contribute to the establishment of indications for PA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24077203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Physician        ISSN: 1533-3159            Impact factor:   4.965


  6 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy of epidural injections in the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Alan David Kaye; Kavita Manchikanti; Mark Boswell; Vidyasagar Pampati; Joshua Hirsch
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-02-01

2.  Factors for Predicting Favorable Outcome of Percutaneous Epidural Adhesiolysis for Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Sang Ho Moon; Jae Il Lee; Hyun Seok Cho; Jin Woo Shin; Won Uk Koh
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.037

3.  Successful Treatment of Lumbar Radicular Pain with Selective Nerve Root Injection Using a Racz Catheter: A Case Report.

Authors:  Donghwi Park; Min Cheol Chang
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  The effect of additional transforaminal epidural blocks on percutaneous epidural neuroplasty with a wire-type catheter: A retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Ho Young Gil; Sook Young Lee; Sang Kee Min; Ji Eun Kim; Hye Seon Lee; Hae Won Jeong; Bumhee Park; Jinhee Choung; Jong Bum Choi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 5.  Efficacy of Percutaneous Adhesiolysis in the Treatment of Lumbar Post Surgery Syndrome.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Kavita N Manchikanti; Christopher G Gharibo; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016-03-07

6.  Percutaneous Adhesiolysis Versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Chronic Radicular Pain Caused by Lumbar Foraminal Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Authors:  Yongbum Park; Woo Yong Lee; Jae Ki Ahn; Hee-Seung Nam; Ki Hoon Lee
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2015-12-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.