Literature DB >> 24077194

Indications for repeat diagnostic medial branch nerve blocks following a failed first medial branch nerve block.

Richard Derby1, Irina Melnik, Jongwoo Choi, Jeong-Eun Lee.   

Abstract

No studies have directly measured the false negative rate of medial branch block (MBB) with correlation to medial branch neurotomy (MBN) outcome. We investigated the potential false negative MBB rate and the subsequent MBN outcome on a consecutive audit of all patients undergoing a double MBB protocol. We prospectively collected audit data and retrospectively collected data by phone on 229 consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic MBB. One-hundred-twenty-two patients reporting greater than 50% of subjective pain relief subsequently underwent either MBN or a confirmatory block followed by MBN. A total of 55 patients underwent a second confirmatory MBB and within that group 27.3% (15/55) reported less than 50% relief post initial MBB and 30.9% (17/55) between 50% and 69% relief. We performed an in-depth analysis of these 2 subgroups focusing on the reason a second MBB was performed despite a "negative" or "indeterminant" first MBB. We divided the "negative" responders to the first MBB into those reporting < 50% relief (Group 1) and those reporting between 50% and 69% relief (Group 2). We calculated a potential 46.7% false negative rate in Group 1 and 47.1% false negative in Group 2; however, the false negative results in Group 1 were predominately in those patients reporting delayed relief of pain and those re-blocked greater than 2 years after the first MBB. The success rate in all patients undergoing MBN was 87% compared to the 75% relief in the false negative groups with no statistically significant difference. In summary, the false negative rate for patients reporting less than 50% relief post MBB is probably less than 20% although there is a high "apparent negative" responds in patients reporting delayed relief or in those who had a second block 2 or more years post initial MBB. Patients reporting between 50 and 69% pain relief have a false negative response rate of 47.1% and should be considered for a confirmatory block.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24077194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Physician        ISSN: 1533-3159            Impact factor:   4.965


  6 in total

1.  Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group.

Authors:  Robert W Hurley; Meredith C B Adams; Meredith Barad; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Andrea Chadwick; Timothy R Deer; Jennifer Hah; W Michael Hooten; Narayan R Kissoon; David Wonhee Lee; Zachary Mccormick; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; David A Provenzano; Byron J Schneider; Maarten van Eerd; Jan Van Zundert; Mark S Wallace; Sara M Wilson; Zirong Zhao; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group.

Authors:  Robert W Hurley; Meredith C B Adams; Meredith Barad; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Andrea Chadwick; Timothy R Deer; Jennifer Hah; W Michael Hooten; Narayan R Kissoon; David Wonhee Lee; Zachary Mccormick; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; David A Provenzano; Byron J Schneider; Maarten van Eerd; Jan Van Zundert; Mark S Wallace; Sara M Wilson; Zirong Zhao; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.288

Review 3.  Ultrasound-guided lumbar medial branch blocks and intra-articular facet joint injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zachary M Ashmore; Michael M Bies; James B Meiling; Rajat N Moman; Leslie C Hassett; Christine L Hunt; Steven P Cohen; W Michael Hooten
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2022-05-16

4.  Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for lumbar facet joint pain from a multispecialty, international working group.

Authors:  Steven P Cohen; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Asokumar Buvanendran; Tim Deer; Shuchita Garg; W Michael Hooten; Robert W Hurley; David J Kennedy; Brian C McLean; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; Sanjog Pangarkar; David Anthony Provenzano; Richard Rauck; B Todd Sitzman; Matthew Smuck; Jan van Zundert; Kevin Vorenkamp; Mark S Wallace; Zirong Zhao
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 6.288

5.  Long-Term Function, Pain and Medication Use Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation for Lumbar Facet Syndrome.

Authors:  Zachary L McCormick; Benjamin Marshall; Jeremy Walker; Robert McCarthy; David R Walega
Journal:  Int J Anesth Anesth       Date:  2015

6.  Evidence-based cervical facet consensus: access or outcome?

Authors:  Richard Derby; Milan P Stojanovic; David J Kennedy
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.288

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.