| Literature DB >> 24077070 |
Andrew Jahoda1, Paul Willner, John Rose, Biza Stenfert Kroese, Claire Lammie, Jennifer Shead, Christopher Woodgate, David Gillespie, Julia Townson, David Felce, Aimee Stimpson, Nikki Rose, Pamela MacMahon, Jacqueline Nuttall, Kerenza Hood.
Abstract
The context for the present study was a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a group-based anger-management intervention, delivered by day-service staff. We aimed to develop a scale to measure the fidelity of manualized cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) delivered to adults with intellectual disabilities in group-based settings. A 30-item monitoring instrument (the MAnualized Group Intervention Check: MAGIC) was adapted from an existing fidelity-monitor instrument for individual CBT. Two sessions for 27 groups were observed by pairs of monitors who had no other contact with the intervention. 16 observers participated, in 15 unique pairings. Observers recorded high levels of inter-rater reliability and the scale had good internal consistency. Fidelity ratings predicted two key outcomes of the intervention, and were themselves predicted by the therapists' clinical supervisors.Entities:
Keywords: Cognitive-behavioural therapy; Fidelity; Group; Intellectual disability; Manual
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24077070 DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Res Dev Disabil ISSN: 0891-4222