Literature DB >> 24076401

IARC classes 1 and 2 carcinogens are successfully identified by an alternative strategy that detects DNA-reactivity and cell transformation ability of chemicals.

Romualdo Benigni1, Cecilia Bossa, Chiara Laura Battistelli, Olga Tcheremenskaia.   

Abstract

For decades, traditional toxicology has been the ultimate source of information on the carcinogenic potential of chemicals; however with increasing demand on regulation of chemicals and decreasing resources for testing, opportunities to accept "alternative" approaches have dramatically expanded. The need for tools able to identify carcinogens in shorter times and at a lower cost in terms of animal lives and money is still an open issue, and the present strategies and regulations for carcinogenicity pre-screening do not adequately protect human health. In previous papers, we have proposed an integrated in vitro/in silico strategy that detects DNA-reactivity and tissue disorganization/disruption by chemicals, and we have shown that the combination of Salmonella and Structural Alerts for the DNA-reactive carcinogens, and in vitro cell transformation assays for nongenotoxic carcinogens permits the identification of a very large proportion (up to 95%) of rodent carcinogens, while having a considerable specificity with the rodent noncarcinogens. In the present paper we expand the previous investigation and show that this alternative strategy identifies correctly IARC Classes 1 and 2 carcinogens. If implemented, this alternative strategy can contribute to improve the protection of human health while decreasing the use of animals.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Mutagenicity; Predictive toxicology; Regulation; Structure–Activity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24076401     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  2 in total

1.  Prioritizing Chemicals for Risk Assessment Using Chemoinformatics: Examples from the IARC Monographs on Pesticides.

Authors:  Neela Guha; Kathryn Z Guyton; Dana Loomis; Dinesh Kumar Barupal
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 2.  Sucralose Non-Carcinogenicity: A Review of the Scientific and Regulatory Rationale.

Authors:  Colin Berry; David Brusick; Samuel M Cohen; Jerry F Hardisty; V Lee Grotz; Gary M Williams
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.900

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.