Literature DB >> 24076383

Attending to what matters: flexibility in adults' and infants' action perception.

Jeff Loucks1, Jessica A Sommerville.   

Abstract

Action perception is selective in that observers attend to and encode certain dimensions of action over others. But how flexible is action perception in its selection of perceptual information? One possibility is that observers consistently attend to particular dimensions of action over others across different contexts. Another possibility, tested here, is that observers flexibly vary their attention to different dimensions of action based on the context in which action occurs. We investigated 9.5-month-old infants' and adults' ability to attend to drop height under varying contexts-aiming to drop an object into a narrow container versus a wide container. We predicted differential attention to increases in aiming height for the narrow container versus the wide container because an increase in aiming height has a differential effect on success (i.e., getting the object into the container) depending on the width of the container. Both adults and infants showed an asymmetry in their attention to aiming height as a function of context; in the wide container condition increases and decreases in aiming height were equally detectable, whereas in the narrow container condition observers more readily discriminated increases over decreases in aiming height. These results indicate that action perception is both selective and flexible according to context, aiding in action prediction and infants' social-cognitive development more broadly.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action observation; Action prediction; Attention; Intention; Motor representations; Perceptual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24076383      PMCID: PMC3911791          DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  33 in total

1.  Discerning intentions in dynamic human action.

Authors:  D A. Baldwin; J A. Baird
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Action plans used in action observation.

Authors:  J Randall Flanagan; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action.

Authors:  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore; Chris Frith
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers.

Authors:  B Calvo-Merino; D E Glaser; J Grèzes; R E Passingham; P Haggard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Goal anticipation during action observation is influenced by synonymous action capabilities, a puzzling developmental study.

Authors:  Gustaf Gredebäck; Olga Kochukhova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Inferring the size of a goal object from an actor's grasping movement in 6- and 9-month-old infants.

Authors:  Moritz M Daum; Maria T Vuori; Wolfgang Prinz; Gisa Aschersleben
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-11

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Motor system activation reveals infants' on-line prediction of others' goals.

Authors:  Victoria Southgate; Mark H Johnson; Imen El Karoui; Gergely Csibra
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-02-16

9.  Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life?

Authors:  Olivier Pascalis; Michelle de Haan; Charles A Nelson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach.

Authors:  A L Woodward
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-11
View more
  4 in total

1.  Infants' grip strength predicts mu rhythm attenuation during observation of lifting actions with weighted blocks.

Authors:  Michaela B Upshaw; Raphael A Bernier; Jessica A Sommerville
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2015-05-01

2.  Developmental Differences in Infants' Fairness Expectations From 6 to 15 Months of Age.

Authors:  Talee Ziv; Jessica A Sommerville
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2016-11-21

3.  Sample size, statistical power, and false conclusions in infant looking-time research.

Authors:  Lisa M Oakes
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2014-04-05

4.  Atypical object exploration in infants at-risk for autism during the first year of lifer.

Authors:  Maninderjit Kaur; Sudha M Srinivasan; Anjana N Bhat
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.