Literature DB >> 24076376

Spatial attention: differential shifts in pseudoneglect direction with time-on-task and initial bias support the idea of observer subtypes.

Christopher S Y Benwell1, Gregor Thut, Gemma Learmonth, Monika Harvey.   

Abstract

Asymmetry in human spatial attention has long been documented. In the general population the majority of individuals tend to misbisect horizontal lines to the left of veridical centre. Nonetheless in virtually all previously reported studies on healthy participants, there have been subsets of people displaying rightward biases. In this study, we report differential time-on task effects depending on participants' initial pseudoneglect bias: participants with an initial left bias in a landmark task (in which they had to judge whether a transection mark appeared closer to the right or left end of a line) showed a significant rightward shift over the course of the experimental session, whereas participants with an initial right bias shifted leftwards. We argue that these differences in initial biases as well as the differential shifts with time-on task reflect genuine observer subtypes displaying diverging behavioural patterns. These observer subtypes could be driven by differences in brain organisation and/or lateralisation such as varying anatomical pathway asymmetries (Thiebaut de Schotten et al., 2011).
© 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional biases; Hemispatial neglect; Landmark; Lateralisation; Line bisection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24076376     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  17 in total

1.  Asymmetries in attention as revealed by fixations and saccades.

Authors:  Nicole A Thomas; Tobias Loetscher; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Flanker interference effects in a line bisection task.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Tina Iachini; Alessandro Iavarone; Giovanni Messina; Andrea Viggiano; Marcellino Monda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Decreasing Alertness Modulates Perceptual Decision-Making.

Authors:  Sridhar R Jagannathan; Corinne A Bareham; Tristan A Bekinschtein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 6.709

4.  Distractor removal amplifies spatial frequency-specific crossover of the attentional bias: a psychophysical and Monte Carlo simulation study.

Authors:  Jiaqing Chen; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Monotonous driving induces shifts in spatial attention as a function of handedness.

Authors:  D Chandrakumar; S Coussens; H A D Keage; S Banks; J Dorrian; T Loetscher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Auditory spatial attention gradients and cognitive control as a function of vigilance.

Authors:  Edward J Golob; Jeremy T Nelson; Jaelle Scheuerman; Kristen B Venable; Jeffrey R Mock
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.348

7.  Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Gemma Learmonth; Aodhan Gallagher; Jamie Gibson; Gregor Thut; Monika Harvey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A rightward shift in the visuospatial attention vector with healthy aging.

Authors:  Christopher S Y Benwell; Gregor Thut; Ashley Grant; Monika Harvey
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  Paired-Pulse Parietal-Motor Stimulation Differentially Modulates Corticospinal Excitability across Hemispheres When Combined with Prism Adaptation.

Authors:  Selene Schintu; Elisa Martín-Arévalo; Michael Vesia; Yves Rossetti; Romeo Salemme; Laure Pisella; Alessandro Farnè; Karen T Reilly
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  No Interaction between tDCS Current Strength and Baseline Performance: A Conceptual Replication.

Authors:  Gemma Learmonth; Francesca Felisatti; Numaya Siriwardena; Matthew Checketts; Christopher S Y Benwell; Gesine Märker; Gregor Thut; Monika Harvey
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.