Zu-Liang Shi1, Hui Peng2, Xian-Wei Hu1, Jie-Gui Hu3. 1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, 281 Jixi Road, Hefei, Anhui 230022, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Hospital Infection Management, Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, 2 West Zheshan Road, Wuhu, Anhui 241001, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, 281 Jixi Road, Hefei, Anhui 230022, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: hujiegui2013@163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Macrolides has been studied as a potential therapeutic anti-inflammatory agent for bronchiectasis patients, which has used as an immunoregulation agent. However, the efficacy and safety results of macrolides across available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are controversial. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of macrolides in bronchiectasis. METHODS: RCTs of macrolides treatment for the patients of bronchiectasis published in PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched. Two authors independently extracted data and assessment the methodological quality. The primary efficacy outcome was the impact on the number of pulmonary exacerbation. Safety outcomes included adverse events and mortality. RESULTS: Seven RCTs were found in the systematic review and six studies were included in the present meta-analysis. Macrolides treatment showed a significant reduced rate of pulmonary exacerbation (RR = 0.55, 95%CI = 0.43-0.70) compared with control groups. However, subgroup analysis failed to find any significant changes in total 46 patients (RR = 0.20, 95%CI = 0.03-1.58) for treatment not more than 3 months. The incidence rates of total adverse events showed no significant difference among the macrolides group and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment of bronchiectasis with macrolides can reduce incidence of pulmonary exacerbation, especially in the subgroup treatment 6 months or more. There was no evidence of increased adverse events with macrolides. However, to verify the best macrolides regimen, more studies based on larger sample size and stratified by ethnicity are still needed. CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS STUDIED IN THIS ARTICLE: Erythromycin (PubChem CID 12560); Azithromycin (PubChem CID: 447043); Clarithromycin (PubChem CID: 84029); Roxithromycin (PubChem CID: 5480431).
PURPOSE:Macrolides has been studied as a potential therapeutic anti-inflammatory agent for bronchiectasis patients, which has used as an immunoregulation agent. However, the efficacy and safety results of macrolides across available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are controversial. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of macrolides in bronchiectasis. METHODS: RCTs of macrolides treatment for the patients of bronchiectasis published in PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched. Two authors independently extracted data and assessment the methodological quality. The primary efficacy outcome was the impact on the number of pulmonary exacerbation. Safety outcomes included adverse events and mortality. RESULTS: Seven RCTs were found in the systematic review and six studies were included in the present meta-analysis. Macrolides treatment showed a significant reduced rate of pulmonary exacerbation (RR = 0.55, 95%CI = 0.43-0.70) compared with control groups. However, subgroup analysis failed to find any significant changes in total 46 patients (RR = 0.20, 95%CI = 0.03-1.58) for treatment not more than 3 months. The incidence rates of total adverse events showed no significant difference among the macrolides group and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment of bronchiectasis with macrolides can reduce incidence of pulmonary exacerbation, especially in the subgroup treatment 6 months or more. There was no evidence of increased adverse events with macrolides. However, to verify the best macrolides regimen, more studies based on larger sample size and stratified by ethnicity are still needed. CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS STUDIED IN THIS ARTICLE: Erythromycin (PubChem CID 12560); Azithromycin (PubChem CID: 447043); Clarithromycin (PubChem CID: 84029); Roxithromycin (PubChem CID: 5480431).
Authors: Malene Plejdrup Hansen; Anna M Scott; Amanda McCullough; Sarah Thorning; Jeffrey K Aronson; Elaine M Beller; Paul P Glasziou; Tammy C Hoffmann; Justin Clark; Chris B Del Mar Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-01-18
Authors: Hamdan Al-Jahdali; Abdullah Alshimemeri; Abdullah Mobeireek; Amr S Albanna; Nehad N Al Shirawi; Siraj Wali; Khaled Alkattan; Abdulrahman A Alrajhi; Khalid Mobaireek; Hassan S Alorainy; Mohamed S Al-Hajjaj; Anne B Chang; Stefano Aliberti Journal: Ann Thorac Med Date: 2017 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 2.219
Authors: Mônica Corso Pereira; Rodrigo Abensur Athanazio; Paulo de Tarso Roth Dalcin; Mara Rúbia Fernandes de Figueiredo; Mauro Gomes; Clarice Guimarães de Freitas; Fernando Ludgren; Ilma Aparecida Paschoal; Samia Zahi Rached; Rosemeri Maurici Journal: J Bras Pneumol Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 2.624
Authors: Karen Head; Lee Yee Chong; Patorn Piromchai; Claire Hopkins; Carl Philpott; Anne G M Schilder; Martin J Burton Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-04-26