Literature DB >> 24076331

Evidence for a response preparation bottleneck during dual-task performance: effect of a startling acoustic stimulus on the psychological refractory period.

Dana Maslovat1, Romeo Chua, Hunter C Spencer, Christopher J Forgaard, Anthony N Carlsen, Ian M Franks.   

Abstract

The present study was designed to investigate the mechanism associated with dual-task interference in a psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm. We used a simple reaction time paradigm consisting of a vocal response (R1) and key-lift task (R2) with a stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between 100ms and 1500ms. On selected trials we implemented a startling acoustic stimulus concurrent with the second stimulus to determine if we could involuntarily trigger the second response. Our results indicated that the PRP delay in the second response was present for both control and startle trials at short SOAs, suggesting the second response was not prepared in advance. These results support a response preparation bottleneck and can be explained via a neural activation model of preparation. In addition, we found that the reflexive startle activation was reduced in the dual-task condition for all SOAs, a result we attribute to prepulse inhibition associated with dual-task processing.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2330: Motor Processes; 2340: Cognitive Processes; Dual-task performance; Neural activation; Prepulse inhibition; Psychological refractory period; Response preparation; Startle

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24076331     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  7 in total

Review 1.  The bottleneck of the psychological refractory period effect involves timing of response initiation rather than response selection.

Authors:  Stuart T Klapp; Dana Maslovat; Richard J Jagacinski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

2.  Investigating limits of task prioritization in dual-tasking: evidence from the prioritized processing and the psychological refractory period paradigms.

Authors:  Tobias Rieger; Victor Mittelstädt; David Dignath; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-09-24

3.  What Cognitive Mechanism, When, Where, and Why? Exploring the Decision Making of University and Professional Rugby Union Players During Competitive Matches.

Authors:  Michael Ashford; Andrew Abraham; Jamie Poolton
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-05-12

4.  Examining interference of different cognitive tasks on voluntary balance control in aging and stroke.

Authors:  Tanvi Bhatt; Savitha Subramaniam; Rini Varghese
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Reduced motor preparation during dual-task performance: evidence from startle.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Neil M Drummond; Michael J Carter; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Responses to startling acoustic stimuli indicate that movement-related activation is constant prior to action: a replication with an alternate interpretation.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Ian M Franks; Alexandra Leguerrier; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-02-06

7.  Parallel and serial task processing in the PRP paradigm: a drift-diffusion model approach.

Authors:  André Mattes; Felice Tavera; Anja Ophey; Mandy Roheger; Robert Gaschler; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-04-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.