OBJECTIVE:High fat, low carbohydrate (HFLC) diets have become popular tools for weight management. We sought to determine the effects of a HFLC diet compared to a low fat high carbohydrate (LFHC) diet on the change in weight loss, cardiovascular risk factors and inflammation in subjects with obesity. METHODS:Obese subjects (29.0-44.6 kg/m2) recruited from Boston Medical Center were randomized to a hypocaloric LFHC (n=26) or HFLC (n=29) diet for 12 weeks. RESULTS:The age range of subjects was 21-62 years. As a percentage of daily calories, the HFLC group consumed 33.5% protein, 56.0% fat and 9.6% carbohydrate and the LFHC group consumed 22.0% protein, 25.0% fat and 55.7% carbohydrate. The change in percent body weight, lean and fat mass, blood pressure, flow mediated dilation, hip:waist ratio, hemoglobin A1C, fasting insulin and glucose, and glucose and insulin response to a 2h oral glucose tolerance test did not differ (P>0.05) between diets after 12 weeks. The HFLC group had greater mean decreases in serum triglyceride (P=0.07), and hs-CRP (P=0.03), and greater mean increases in HDL cholesterol (P=0.004), and total adiponectin (P=0.045) relative to the LFHC. Secreted adipose tissue adiponectin or TNF-α did not differ after weight loss for either diet. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to the LFHC group, the HFLC group had greater improvements in blood lipids and systemic inflammation with similar changes in body weight and composition. This small-scale study suggests that HFLC diets may be more beneficial to cardiovascular health and inflammation in free-living obese adults compared to LFHC diets.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: High fat, low carbohydrate (HFLC) diets have become popular tools for weight management. We sought to determine the effects of a HFLC diet compared to a low fat high carbohydrate (LFHC) diet on the change in weight loss, cardiovascular risk factors and inflammation in subjects with obesity. METHODS:Obese subjects (29.0-44.6 kg/m2) recruited from Boston Medical Center were randomized to a hypocaloric LFHC (n=26) or HFLC (n=29) diet for 12 weeks. RESULTS: The age range of subjects was 21-62 years. As a percentage of daily calories, the HFLC group consumed 33.5% protein, 56.0% fat and 9.6% carbohydrate and the LFHC group consumed 22.0% protein, 25.0% fat and 55.7% carbohydrate. The change in percent body weight, lean and fat mass, blood pressure, flow mediated dilation, hip:waist ratio, hemoglobin A1C, fasting insulin and glucose, and glucose and insulin response to a 2horal glucose tolerance test did not differ (P>0.05) between diets after 12 weeks. The HFLC group had greater mean decreases in serum triglyceride (P=0.07), and hs-CRP (P=0.03), and greater mean increases in HDL cholesterol (P=0.004), and total adiponectin (P=0.045) relative to the LFHC. Secreted adipose tissue adiponectin or TNF-α did not differ after weight loss for either diet. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to the LFHC group, the HFLC group had greater improvements in blood lipids and systemic inflammation with similar changes in body weight and composition. This small-scale study suggests that HFLC diets may be more beneficial to cardiovascular health and inflammation in free-living obese adults compared to LFHC diets.
Authors: Jeff S Volek; Matthew J Sharman; Ana L Gómez; Chris DiPasquale; Melissa Roti; Amy Pumerantz; William J Kraemer Journal: J Am Coll Nutr Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Prakash Seshadri; Nayyar Iqbal; Linda Stern; Monica Williams; Kathryn L Chicano; Denise A Daily; Joyce McGrory; Edward J Gracely; Daniel J Rader; Frederick F Samaha Journal: Am J Med Date: 2004-09-15 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Gary D Foster; Holly R Wyatt; James O Hill; Brian G McGuckin; Carrie Brill; B Selma Mohammed; Philippe O Szapary; Daniel J Rader; Joel S Edman; Samuel Klein Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-05-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: G Valsamakis; P G McTernan; R Chetty; N Al Daghri; A Field; W Hanif; A H Barnett; S Kumar Journal: Metabolism Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Fred K Tabung; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Jorge E Chavarro; Kana Wu; Charles S Fuchs; Frank B Hu; Andrew T Chan; Walter C Willett; Edward L Giovannucci Journal: J Nutr Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: B S Fernandes; J Steiner; H-G Bernstein; S Dodd; J A Pasco; O M Dean; P Nardin; C-A Gonçalves; M Berk Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Heidi J Silver; Hakmook Kang; Charles D Keil; James A Muldowney; Heidi Kocalis; Sergio Fazio; Douglas E Vaughan; Kevin D Niswender Journal: Metabolism Date: 2014-01-17 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Jian Liu; Peipei Wang; Samuel L Douglas; Joshua M Tate; Simon Sham; Steven G Lloyd Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 4.733