Literature DB >> 24075484

Blood pressure control in continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: efficacy and impact on adverse events.

Brent C Lampert1, Chad Eckert2, Stephanie Weaver1, Ana Scanlon1, Kathy Lockard1, Carrie Allen1, Nicole Kunz1, Christian Bermudez1, Jay K Bhama1, Michael A Shullo1, Robert L Kormos1, Mary Amanda Dew3, Jeffrey J Teuteberg4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continuous flow (CF) left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are afterload sensitive and therefore pump performance is affected by hypertension. In addition, poorly controlled hypertension may increase the risk of aortic insufficiency (AI) and stroke. Blood pressure regimens after CF LVAD have not been studied and their impact on rates of AI and stroke are unknown.
METHODS: Patients who had CF LVAD at a single center and were supported greater than 30 days were included. Blood pressure was monitored at home by Doppler. Outpatient management of blood pressure was conducted according to a predefined institutional protocol (target mean arterial pressure ≤ 80 mm Hg).
RESULTS: A total of 96 patients were included. At the end of follow-up, 25 patients were not on an antihypertensive drug, of these 9 died. Of the 74% receiving antihypertensives, 54% required 1 medication, 34% were on 2, 10% were on 3, and 3% were on 4 or more. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (85% of patients on an antihypertensive) and beta blockers (30%) were the most commonly prescribed medications. There was a significantly higher neurologic event rate in those on no antihypertensives compared with those on antihypertensives (p = 0.009). Only 3% of patients with no or mild AI at baseline progressed to develop moderate or greater AI after a mean of 201 days of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Blood pressure control can be achieved in patients with CF LVADs, with the majority of patients requiring only 1 or 2 antihypertensives.
Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  27

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24075484     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  18 in total

Review 1.  Remote hemodynamic monitoring for ambulatory left ventricular assist device patients.

Authors:  Brent C Lampert; Sitaramesh Emani
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Management of aortic insufficiency in the continuous flow left ventricular assist device population.

Authors:  Jonathan Holtz; Jeffrey Teuteberg
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2014-03

3.  Outcomes after stroke complicating left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Joshua Z Willey; Michael V Gavalas; Pauline N Trinh; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; A Reshad Garan; Allison P Levin; Koji Takeda; Hiroo Takayama; Justin Fried; Yoshifumi Naka; Veli K Topkara; Paolo C Colombo
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 10.247

4.  HeartMate 3-a "Step" in the right direction.

Authors:  Juglans Alvarez; Vivek Rao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitor Designed for Patients With Heart Failure Supported with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Pavol Sajgalik; Vaclav Kremen; Vratislav Fabian; Simon Maltais; John M Stulak; Sudhir S Kushwaha; Lyle D Joyce; John A Schirger; Bruce D Johnson
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.872

6.  Use of Heart Failure Medical Therapies Among Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Insights From INTERMACS.

Authors:  Prateeti Khazanie; Bradley G Hammill; Chetan B Patel; Michael S Kiernan; Lauren B Cooper; Suzanne V Arnold; Timothy J Fendler; John A Spertus; Lesley H Curtis; Adrian F Hernandez
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 7.  Mechanical circulatory support in children: past, present and future.

Authors:  Svetlana B Shugh; Kyle W Riggs; David L S Morales
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2019-10

Review 8.  [Recommendations for emergency management of patients with permanent mechanical circulatory support : Consensus statement of DGTHG, DIVI, DGIIN, DGAI, DGINA, DGfK and DGK].

Authors:  Kevin Pilarczyk; Udo Boeken; Andreas Beckmann; Andreas Markewitz; P Christian Schulze; Martin Pin; Ingo Gräff; Sebastian Schmidt; Birk Runge; Hans-Jörg Busch; Michael R Preusch; Nils Haake; Gereon Schälte; Jan Gummert; Guido Michels
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 9.  Blood pressure management in mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Mosi K Bennett; Sirtaz Adatya
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 10.  Prevention and Treatment of Thrombotic and Hemorrhagic Complications in Patients Supported by Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Renzo Y Loyaga-Rendon; Milena Jani; David Fermin; Jennifer K McDermott; Diane Vancamp; Sangjin Lee
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.