Mun-Kun Hong1, Tang-Yuan Chu, Yu-Chi Wei, Dah-Ching Ding. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan; Institute of Medical Science, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze short-term outcomes of pelvic prolapse surgery using Prolift transvaginal mesh in a teaching hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients who received prolapse surgery with Prolift were followed up for 7-26 months. Assessment included pre- and postoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stage, and Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI)-6, and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ)-7 scores. Surgical characteristics and adverse events during follow-up were also recorded. RESULTS: Objective and subjective data were available for 29 patients. The overall anatomical success rate was 96.5 % (28/29) after a mean of 18 ± 6.3 months follow-up. The POP-Q, UDI, and IIQ all improved significantly after surgery. Uterine sparing prolapsed surgery with Prolift unexpectedly yielded a cure rate of 100%. Ten adverse events occurred during and after prolapse surgery with dyspareunia (3/34) as the most common, followed by bladder injury (2/34). CONCLUSIONS: Prolapse surgery with Prolift yielded a good anatomical outcome and satisfactory symptom improvement at different periods of follow-up, especially in uterus-sparing prolapse surgery. However, adverse events were not uncommon, and patients should be fully informed of all possible adverse events prior to surgery.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze short-term outcomes of pelvic prolapse surgery using Prolift transvaginal mesh in a teaching hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients who received prolapse surgery with Prolift were followed up for 7-26 months. Assessment included pre- and postoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stage, and Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI)-6, and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ)-7 scores. Surgical characteristics and adverse events during follow-up were also recorded. RESULTS: Objective and subjective data were available for 29 patients. The overall anatomical success rate was 96.5 % (28/29) after a mean of 18 ± 6.3 months follow-up. The POP-Q, UDI, and IIQ all improved significantly after surgery. Uterine sparing prolapsed surgery with Prolift unexpectedly yielded a cure rate of 100%. Ten adverse events occurred during and after prolapse surgery with dyspareunia (3/34) as the most common, followed by bladder injury (2/34). CONCLUSIONS: Prolapse surgery with Prolift yielded a good anatomical outcome and satisfactory symptom improvement at different periods of follow-up, especially in uterus-sparing prolapse surgery. However, adverse events were not uncommon, and patients should be fully informed of all possible adverse events prior to surgery.