Literature DB >> 24075365

Modern role of sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse surgery--a systemic review.

Ling-Hong Tseng1, Ilene Chen, Shuenn-Dyh Chang, Chyi-Long Lee.   

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition in women. Women with POP often experience pelvic discomfort, urinary and fecal problems, sexual dysfunction, and an overall decrease in their quality of life. Surgical treatment is a feasible option if conservative management fails. Various surgical techniques have been proposed to correct POP with or without the use of graft material. Owing to recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration warnings about mesh-related complications, sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSF), as a traditional vaginal procedure, may play an important role again. To answer this question and evaluate quantitatively the efficacy of SSF in POP, we conducted a systemic review of the available data about SSF and POP. Interventions had to include SSF as a point of attachment. To eliminate confounding bias and effect modification, at least one arm must include SSF without mesh or graft. All follow-up periods were allowed. Information on the following parameters was extracted and entered into a database: study design, type of intervention, number of patients, follow-up in months, cure rate, recurrence rate, intra/postoperative complications, and/or uni/bilateral, preventive/therapeutic, or concomitant procedures. Published papers from the years 1995 to 2011 were selected for analysis.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  pelvic organ prolapse; pelvic reconstruction surgery; sacrospinous ligament fixation; systemic review

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24075365     DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2012.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1028-4559            Impact factor:   1.705


  11 in total

1.  Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse repair.

Authors:  Rodolfo Milani; Matteo Frigerio; Stefano Manodoro
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  The resurrection of sacrospinous fixation: unilateral apical sling hysteropexy.

Authors:  Dmitry Shkarupa; Nikita Kubin; Ekaterina Shapovalova; Anastasya Zaytseva
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Bilateral sacrospinous fixation without hysterectomy: 18-month follow-up.

Authors:  Mehmet Baki Şentürk; Hakan Güraslan; Yusuf Çakmak; Murat Ekin
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-06-01

4.  Is performing sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy and McCall's culdoplasty for advanced uterovaginal prolapse preferable over McCall's culdoplasty alone?

Authors:  Deepa Rajan; Patsy Varghese; Mariam Roy; Kunjamma Roy; Alice David
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2019-09-11

5.  Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF): an old method with new horizons.

Authors:  Elad Leron; Offer Erez; Polina Shwarzmam; Kaven Baessler
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Perioperative and Long-Term Anatomical and Subjective Outcomes of Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension for POP-Q Stages II-IV Apical Prolapse.

Authors:  Paulina Szymczak; Magdalena Emilia Grzybowska; Sambor Sawicki; Konrad Futyma; Dariusz Grzegorz Wydra
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 7.  The Novel and Minimally Invasive Treatment Modalities for Female Pelvic Floor Muscle Dysfunction; Beyond the Traditional

Authors:  Yiğit Akın; Matthew Young; Muhammad Elmussareh; Nickolaus Charalampogiannis; Ali Serdar Gözen
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.021

8.  Sacrospinous ligament fixation: medium and long-term anatomical results, functional and quality of life results.

Authors:  Angeline Favre-Inhofer; Marie Carbonnel; Rouba Murtada; Aurélie Revaux; Jennifer Asmar; Jean-Marc Ayoubi
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Analyzing the learning curve of vaginal pelvic reconstruction surgery with and without mesh by the cumulative summation test (CUSUM).

Authors:  Chin-Jui Wu; Kuan-Ju Huang; Wen-Chun Chang; Ying-Xuan Li; Lin-Hung Wei; Bor-Ching Sheu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Modified posterior intravaginal slingplasty: does the additional bilateral tape attachment to the sacrospinous ligament improve the results?

Authors:  Alpaslan Caliskan; Mehmet Ozeren; Klaus Goeschen
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2018-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.