Literature DB >> 2407524

Endosonographic appearance of the esophagus in achalasia.

K Ziegler1, C Sanft, M Friedrich, M Gregor, E O Riecken.   

Abstract

Primary motility disorders of the esophagus require the exclusion of intramural tumors. The procedures currently used for the differential diagnosis of achalasia such as endoscopy with biopsy, esophageal and gastric radiography, abdomino-thoracic computed tomography and intraluminal esophageal manometry, are unsatisfactory when a tumor growing intramurally is suspected. A more recent method of studying the integrity of the gastrointestinal wall and its surrounding tissue is endoscopic ultrasonography. In 16 patients suspected of having achalasia, endosonography was performed in addition to the above-mentioned conventional examinations. Fifteen of them showed a normal ultrasonic structure of the wall of the gastro-esophageal junction, with no sign of hypertrophy of the smooth muscle layer. In the remaining case endoscopic ultrasonography was able to detect an intramural tumor, as evidenced by the inhomogeneous ultrasonic structure of the esophageal wall. Computed tomography and all the other conventional diagnostic procedures used failed to demonstrate this tumor. In conclusion, the findings presented strongly suggest that endosonography can contribute to the differential diagnosis of achalasia and intramural tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2407524     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1012776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  11 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative staging of gastrointestinal tumors by endosonography.

Authors:  K Ziegler; C Sanft; M Zeitz; E O Riecken
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Endoscopic ultrasound as an adjunctive evaluation in patients with esophageal motor disorders subtyped by high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  K Krishnan; C-Y Lin; R Keswani; J E Pandolfino; P J Kahrilas; S Komanduri
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 3.  The value of endoscopy and endosonography in the diagnosis of the dysphagic patient.

Authors:  R Lorenz; G Jorysz; M Classen
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 4.  Malignancy-induced secondary achalasia.

Authors:  H P Parkman; S Cohen
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Pseudoachalasia of the cardia secondary to nongastrointestinal neoplasia.

Authors:  Jose Luis Ulla; Estela Fernandez-Salgado; Victoria Alvarez; Alberto Ibañez; Santiago Soto; Daniel Carpio; Javier Vazquez-Sanluis; Luis Ledo; Enrique Vazquez-Astray
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  Endoscopic ultrasound: a powerful tool to modify treatment algorithms in opioid-induced achalasia.

Authors:  Arielle M Lee; Josefin Holmgren; Ryan C Broderick; Joslin N Cheverie; Bryan J Sandler; Garth R Jacobsen; Wilson T Kwong; David C Kunkel; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Pseudoachalasia as a result of metastatic cervical cancer.

Authors:  O S Bholat; R S Haluck
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Pseudoachalasia presenting 20 years after Nissen fundoplication: a case report.

Authors:  Chuong N Lai; Kumar Krishnan; Min P Kim; Brian J Dunkin; Puja Gaur
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 1.637

9.  Focal achalasia - case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Marcus Joachim Herzig; Radu Tutuian
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2018-01-15

Review 10.  A controversy that has been tough to swallow: is the treatment of achalasia now digested?

Authors:  Garrett R Roll; Charlotte Rabl; Ruxandra Ciovica; Sofia Peeva; Guilherme M Campos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.