Annemarie Coolbrandt1, Hans Wildiers2, Bert Aertgeerts3, Elisa Van der Elst4, Annouschka Laenen5, Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé4, Theo van Achterberg6, Koen Milisen7. 1. Center for Health Services and Nursing Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology Nursing, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: annemarie.coolbrandt@uzleuven.be. 2. Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium. 3. Academic Centre for General Practice, KU Leuven, Belgium. 4. Center for Health Services and Nursing Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 5. Interuniversity Centre for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, KU Leuven, Belgium. 6. Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands. 7. Center for Health Services and Nursing Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Division of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The multiplicity and complexity of symptoms in patients treated with chemotherapy requires multifaceted symptom management interventions. The aim of this systematic review was to describe the characteristics and evaluate the effectiveness of complex nursing interventions that target multiple symptoms in patients receiving chemotherapy. DESIGN: We searched Medline, Embase, Cinahl and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials that compared complex nursing interventions to usual care and that provided data on symptom prevalence, severity, distress or limitations. Characteristics of the interventions were described in a narrative way. Regarding the effectiveness of the interventions, ratios of means were calculated in order to present data in a comparable and clinically interpretable way. RESULTS: We included 11 studies, some with considerable risk of bias. Despite being heterogeneous, the interventions have patient education, symptom assessment and coaching in common. Although some interventions fail to show significant effects, others significantly reduce aspects of symptom burden by 10-88%. CONCLUSION: Although some complex nursing interventions in this systematic review produce clinically meaningful and statistically relevant reductions in symptom burden, based on the available data it is not possible to make definitive conclusions about the vital parts, circumstances or preferred target population of the interventions. Quality of the studies and modeling and piloting of the interventions are important challenges for future research.
OBJECTIVES: The multiplicity and complexity of symptoms in patients treated with chemotherapy requires multifaceted symptom management interventions. The aim of this systematic review was to describe the characteristics and evaluate the effectiveness of complex nursing interventions that target multiple symptoms in patients receiving chemotherapy. DESIGN: We searched Medline, Embase, Cinahl and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials that compared complex nursing interventions to usual care and that provided data on symptom prevalence, severity, distress or limitations. Characteristics of the interventions were described in a narrative way. Regarding the effectiveness of the interventions, ratios of means were calculated in order to present data in a comparable and clinically interpretable way. RESULTS: We included 11 studies, some with considerable risk of bias. Despite being heterogeneous, the interventions have patient education, symptom assessment and coaching in common. Although some interventions fail to show significant effects, others significantly reduce aspects of symptom burden by 10-88%. CONCLUSION: Although some complex nursing interventions in this systematic review produce clinically meaningful and statistically relevant reductions in symptom burden, based on the available data it is not possible to make definitive conclusions about the vital parts, circumstances or preferred target population of the interventions. Quality of the studies and modeling and piloting of the interventions are important challenges for future research.
Authors: N Fridriksdottir; S Gunnarsdottir; S Zoëga; B Ingadottir; E J G Hafsteinsdottir Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Nadja Klafke; Cornelia Mahler; Cornelia von Hagens; Lorenz Uhlmann; Martina Bentner; Andreas Schneeweiss; Andreas Mueller; Joachim Szecsenyi; Stefanie Joos Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Nadja Klafke; Cornelia Mahler; Cornelia von Hagens; Gisela Blaser; Martina Bentner; Stefanie Joos Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 3.359