BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease with lung transplantation as the only option for those patients refractory to medical therapy. Although several equations have been developed to predict PAH patient survival, it is unclear whether they can predict survival for patients awaiting transplantation. METHODS: Data were analyzed on 827 patients listed since 1991 on the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Overall survival and survival for patients listed prior to and after January 1, 2006 was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method and compared with predicted survival from the pulmonary hypertension connection (PHC) and lung allocation system (LAS) equations. A new equation using a novel model selection algorithm for correlated covariates and missing data was developed using clinical factors and variables in the LAS score. Model validation statistics were calculated and averaged across 500 bootstrap resamples within each of 5 imputation data sets. K-M with 95% confidence intervals and receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves assessed model performance. RESULTS: PHC predicted overall survival but underestimated and overestimated survival for those listed pre- and post-2006, respectively. The best model included baseline 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), invasive cardiac output and resting oxygen requirement (O2). Factors associated with 1-year waitlist survival included: resting O2 amount; invasive hemodynamics; 6MWD; and functional class. The new equation by ROC analysis outperformed the LAS and PHC equations. CONCLUSIONS: Current prediction models overestimate survival for PAH patients listed for transplant in the LAS era. This new survival equation can help guide clinicians caring for PAH patients with progression of disease requiring transplant.
BACKGROUND:Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease with lung transplantation as the only option for those patients refractory to medical therapy. Although several equations have been developed to predict PAH patient survival, it is unclear whether they can predict survival for patients awaiting transplantation. METHODS: Data were analyzed on 827 patients listed since 1991 on the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Overall survival and survival for patients listed prior to and after January 1, 2006 was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method and compared with predicted survival from the pulmonary hypertension connection (PHC) and lung allocation system (LAS) equations. A new equation using a novel model selection algorithm for correlated covariates and missing data was developed using clinical factors and variables in the LAS score. Model validation statistics were calculated and averaged across 500 bootstrap resamples within each of 5 imputation data sets. K-M with 95% confidence intervals and receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves assessed model performance. RESULTS: PHC predicted overall survival but underestimated and overestimated survival for those listed pre- and post-2006, respectively. The best model included baseline 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), invasive cardiac output and resting oxygen requirement (O2). Factors associated with 1-year waitlist survival included: resting O2 amount; invasive hemodynamics; 6MWD; and functional class. The new equation by ROC analysis outperformed the LAS and PHC equations. CONCLUSIONS: Current prediction models overestimate survival for PAH patients listed for transplant in the LAS era. This new survival equation can help guide clinicians caring for PAH patients with progression of disease requiring transplant.
Authors: Roham T Zamanian; Kristina T Kudelko; Yon K Sung; Vinicio de Jesus Perez; Juliana Liu; Edda Spiekerkoetter Journal: Circ Res Date: 2014-06-20 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Manu M Mysore; Kenneth C Bilchick; Priscilla Ababio; Benjamin K Ruth; William C Harding; Khadijah Breathett; Kimberley Chadwell; Brandy Patterson; Hunter Mwansa; Christiana M Jeukeng; Younghoon Kwon; Jamie L W Kennedy; Andrew D Mihalek; Sula Mazimba Journal: Echocardiography Date: 2018-10-12 Impact factor: 1.724
Authors: Anthony Castleberry; Michael S Mulvihill; Babatunde A Yerokun; Brian C Gulack; Brian Englum; Laurie Snyder; Mathias Worni; Asishana Osho; Scott Palmer; R Duane Davis; Matthew G Hartwig Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2016-12-30 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Keith M Wille; Nirmal S Sharma; Tejaswini Kulkarni; Matthew R Lammi; Joseph B Barney; S Christopher Bellot; Ryan S Cantor; David C Naftel; Enrique Diaz-Guzman; David C McGiffin Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2014-11
Authors: Lorriana E Leard; Are M Holm; Maryam Valapour; Allan R Glanville; Sandeep Attawar; Meghan Aversa; Silvia V Campos; Lillian M Christon; Marcelo Cypel; Göran Dellgren; Matthew G Hartwig; Siddhartha G Kapnadak; Nicholas A Kolaitis; Robert M Kotloff; Caroline M Patterson; Oksana A Shlobin; Patrick J Smith; Amparo Solé; Melinda Solomon; David Weill; Marlies S Wijsenbeek; Brigitte W M Willemse; Selim M Arcasoy; Kathleen J Ramos Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2021-07-24 Impact factor: 13.569
Authors: David Furfaro; Erika B Rosenzweig; Lori Shah; Hilary Robbins; Michaela Anderson; Hanyoung Kim; Darryl Abrams; Cara L Agerstrand; Daniel Brodie; Danielle Feldhaus; Joseph Costa; Philippe Lemaitre; Bryan P Stanifer; Frank D'Ovidio; Joshua R Sonett; Selim Arcasoy; Luke Benvenuto Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 13.569
Authors: James C Coons; Kristen Pogue; Andrew R Kolodziej; Glenn A Hirsch; Marjorie Patricia George Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: James C Coons; Karryn Crisamore; Solomon Adams; Ashley Modany; Marc A Simon; Wenchen Zhao; Imam H Shaik; Raman Venkataramanan; Philip E Empey Journal: Ther Adv Respir Dis Date: 2021 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 4.031