Literature DB >> 24074506

The posterior pedicle screw construct: 5-year results for thoracolumbar and lumbar curves.

James T Bennett1, Jane S Hoashi, Robert J Ames, Jeff S Kimball, Joshua M Pahys, Amer F Samdani.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Several studies of the outcomes of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with thoracolumbar and lumbar curves after treatment with posterior pedicle screws have been reported, but most of these studies reported only 2-year follow-up. The authors analyzed the radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with thoracolumbar and lumbar curves treated with posterior pedicle screws after 5 years of follow-up.
METHODS: A multicenter database was retrospectively queried to identify patients with AIS who underwent spinal fusion for Lenke 3C, 5C, and 6C curves. Radiographs from the following times were compared: preoperative, first follow-up visit, 1-year follow-up visit, 2-year follow-up visit, and 5-year follow-up visit. Chart review included scoliometer measurements, Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaires, and complications requiring return to the operating room.
RESULTS: Among 26 patients with Lenke 3C, 5C, and 6C curves, the mean (± SD) age was 14.6 ± 2.1 years. From the time of the preoperative radiographs to the 5-year follow-up radiographs, there was a statistically significant improvement in the mean coronal lumbar Cobb angles (p < 0.0001), and from the time of the first postoperative radiographs to the 5-year follow-up radiographs, the lumbar curve remained stable (p = 0.14). From the time of the preoperative radiographs to the 5-year follow-up radiographs, there was a statistically significant improvement in the mean coronal thoracic Cobb angles (p < 0.0001), and from the time of the first postoperative radiographs to the 5-year follow-up radiographs, the thoracic curve remained stable (p = 0.10). From the first postoperative visit to the 5-year follow-up visit, the thoracic kyphosis (T5-12) remained stable (p = 0.10), and from the time of the preoperative radiographs to the 5-year follow-up radiographs, the lumbar lordosis (T-12 to top of sacrum) remained stable (p = 0.44). From the preoperative visit to the 5-year follow-up visit, the coronal balance improved significantly (p < 0.05) and remained stable from the first postoperative visit to the 5-year follow-up visit (p = 0.20). The SRS-22 total scores improved significantly from before surgery to 5 years after surgery (p < 0.0001). No patients required reoperation because of complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Correction of the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes in this cohort of patients was maintained from the first follow-up measurements to 5 years after surgery. In addition, at 5 years after surgery total SRS-22 scores and inclinometer readings were improved from preoperative scores and measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24074506     DOI: 10.3171/2013.8.SPINE12816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  10 in total

1.  Interest of T1 parameters for sagittal alignment evaluation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.

Authors:  S Pesenti; B Blondel; E Peltier; E Choufani; G Bollini; J L Jouve
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Coronal balance in idiopathic scoliosis: a radiological study after posterior fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar curves (Lenke 5 or 6).

Authors:  Changwei Yang; Yunfei Zhao; Xiao Zhai; Jingfeng Li; Xiaodong Zhu; Ming Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Lowest instrumented vertebrae selection for selective posterior fusion of moderate thoracolumbar/lumbar idiopathic scoliosis: lower-end vertebra or lower-end vertebra+1?

Authors:  Zhijian Sun; Guixing Qiu; Yu Zhao; Yipeng Wang; Jianguo Zhang; Jianxiong Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Radiological factors affecting post-operative global coronal balance in Lenke 5 C scoliosis.

Authors:  Ajoy Prasad Shetty; Subramani Suresh; Siddharth N Aiyer; Rishi Kanna; Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

5.  Anterior versus posterior approach in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis of fusion segments and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Ming Luo; Wengang Wang; Mingkui Shen; Lei Xia
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 6.  Perioperative outcome and complications following single-staged Posterior Spinal Fusion (PSF) using pedicle screw instrumentation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS): a review of 1057 cases from a single centre.

Authors:  Mun Keong Kwan; Kwong Weng Loh; Weng Hong Chung; Chee Kidd Chiu; Mohd Shahnaz Hasan; Chris Yin Wei Chan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Long-Term Follow-up of Posterior Selective Thoracolumbar/Lumbar Fusion in Patients With Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Analysis of 10-Year Outcomes.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Yu Chen; Jie Shao; Junke Zhoutian; Fei Wang; Ziqiang Chen; Ming Li
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-10-16

8.  Cervical sagittal alignment is influenced by changes in thoracic and lumbar sagittal alignments after correction surgery in patients with lenke type 6 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Toshiki Okubo; Mitsuru Yagi; Satoshi Suzuki; Yohei Takahashi; Satoshi Nori; Osahiko Tsuji; Narihito Nagoshi; Morio Matsumoto; Masaya Nakamura; Kota Watanabe
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-09-05

9.  Spontaneous Thoracic Curve Correction After Selective Posterior Fusion of Thoracolumbar/Lumbar Curves in Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Xi-Ming Xu; Xian-Zhao Wei; Xiao-Dong Zhu; Ming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Surgical treatment of Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Comparison of anterior vs posterior approach.

Authors:  Mark F Abel; Anuj Singla; Mark A Feger; Lindsay D Sauer; Wendy Novicoff
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-09-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.