OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore the preferred treatment for pre-school children with caries of different severities in primary teeth among general dental practitioners (GDPs) and specialists in paediatric dentistry (PDs) in Hong Kong, and to determine the difference in practice patterns between the groups. METHODS: A random sample of 476 GDPs (approximately 25% of all registered dentists) and all registered PDs (n = 28) were invited to participate in the study. Both groups were asked to select their single most preferred treatment option on eight hypothetical clinical case scenarios in which the severity of dental caries in a single primary molar/incisor of a 4-year-old healthy and cooperative boy differed. The distribution frequency of responses was tabled. Difference in the care approach patterns of GDPs and PDs were examined in bivariate and regression analyses. RESULTS: The overall response rate of the study was 61.5% (310/504). There were significant differences between the GDPs and PDs on their preferred treatment in six out of eight case scenarios (P < 0.05). PDs favoured comprehensive restorative treatment more than GDPs. Non-interventionist approach, atraumatic restorative technique or extraction were more popular among GDPs. Variation in treatment choices was apparent within both GDPs and PDs, in which spread of treatment options was wider among GDPs. CONCLUSIONS: GDPs and PDs have different dental care approach patterns for pre-school children with dental caries. Wide variation in the views about the best way to treat the child exists within both groups.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore the preferred treatment for pre-school children with caries of different severities in primary teeth among general dental practitioners (GDPs) and specialists in paediatric dentistry (PDs) in Hong Kong, and to determine the difference in practice patterns between the groups. METHODS: A random sample of 476 GDPs (approximately 25% of all registered dentists) and all registered PDs (n = 28) were invited to participate in the study. Both groups were asked to select their single most preferred treatment option on eight hypothetical clinical case scenarios in which the severity of dental caries in a single primary molar/incisor of a 4-year-old healthy and cooperative boy differed. The distribution frequency of responses was tabled. Difference in the care approach patterns of GDPs and PDs were examined in bivariate and regression analyses. RESULTS: The overall response rate of the study was 61.5% (310/504). There were significant differences between the GDPs and PDs on their preferred treatment in six out of eight case scenarios (P < 0.05). PDs favoured comprehensive restorative treatment more than GDPs. Non-interventionist approach, atraumatic restorative technique or extraction were more popular among GDPs. Variation in treatment choices was apparent within both GDPs and PDs, in which spread of treatment options was wider among GDPs. CONCLUSIONS: GDPs and PDs have different dental care approach patterns for pre-school children with dental caries. Wide variation in the views about the best way to treat the child exists within both groups.
Authors: Aleighia M Barker; Kavita R Mathu-Muju; David A Nash; Hsin-Fang Li; Heather M Bush Journal: Pediatr Dent Date: 2012 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.874