Literature DB >> 24073850

Late maturers at a performance disadvantage to their more mature peers in junior Australian football.

Paul B Gastin1, Gary Bennett.   

Abstract

Children and adolescents mature at different rates such that individuals competing in the same competition may differ in physical and biological maturity despite being of similar chronological age. Whether or not differences translate into on-field performance in competition is relatively unknown. This study investigated the influence of biological maturity on fitness and match running performance in junior Australian football. Eighty-seven under-15 years players were categorised into early (n = 20), average (n = 45) and late (n = 22) maturity groups based on self-reported and anthropometric assessment of biological maturity. Running movements during competition were collected using GPS (5 Hz) technology. Early maturers were heavier and taller than all other boys (P < 0.05), while biological maturity was significantly correlated to 20 m sprint (r = 0.53, P < 0.01). Total distance, high-intensity (>14.4 km · h(-1)) running distance and number of high-intensity efforts were significantly greater (20.8%, 53.6%, 31.7%, respectively; P < 0.01) in early compared to late maturers. Number of sprints and peak speed in competition were not different. Pubertal development and maturity status partially explained the differences between players in physical size, functional running fitness and match running performance. Late maturing players in this Australian football under-15 age group were at a physical and performance disadvantage to their earlier maturing peers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24073850     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2013.843016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  6 in total

1.  Applied Sport Science of Australian Football: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rich D Johnston; Georgia M Black; Peter W Harrison; Nick B Murray; Damien J Austin
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  "How Much is that Player in the Window? The One with the Early Birthday?" Relative Age Influences the Value of the Best Soccer Players, but Not the Best Businesspeople.

Authors:  Philip Furley; Daniel Memmert; Matthias Weigelt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-02

Review 3.  Physical characteristics of players within the Australian Football League participation pathways: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jade A Z Haycraft; Stephanie Kovalchik; David B Pyne; Sam Robertson
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2017-12-19

4.  Functional Movements in Japanese Mini-Basketball Players.

Authors:  Kenji Kuzuhara; Masashi Shibata; Junta Iguchi; Ryo Uchida
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 5.  Impact of the Relative Age Effect on Competition Performance in Basketball: A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alfonso de la Rubia Riaza; Jorge Lorenzo Calvo; Daniel Mon-López; Alberto Lorenzo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Strength and VO2max Changes by Exercise Training According to Maturation State in Children.

Authors:  Liliana Aracely Enríquez-Del-Castillo; Andrea Ornelas-López; Lidia G De León; Natanael Cervantes-Hernández; Estefanía Quintana-Mendias; Luis Alberto Flores
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.