Literature DB >> 2407266

Some problems with antihypertensive drug studies in the context of the new guidelines.

M Rose1, F G McMahon.   

Abstract

A dose-response analysis establishes the efficacy of most drugs. The medical literature is replete with so-called "Dose-Responses" to antihypertensive agents. The majority of these have failed. The use of a placebo helps minimize bias, though most studies here simply compared a test drug with the old drug. Short-acting drugs can have their duration of effect prolonged by giving larger doses than necessary. In order to produce more meaningful data, the Food and Drug Administration gathered together a group of experts who collectively proposed a set of Guidelines for studying these drugs. Though the final version has not yet been issued, investigators and clinicians working with this class of drugs are vitally interested in these guidelines, and have already encountered several problems. We identify some of these problems and propose some solutions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2407266     DOI: 10.1093/ajh/3.2.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  10 in total

Review 1.  Clinical trials and clinical practice in the elderly. A focus on hypertension.

Authors:  M E Kitler
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Antihypertensive duration of action of cilazapril in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.

Authors:  I Kobrin; P Güntzel; R Viskoper; E Paran; R Zimlichman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Trough/peak ratios for antihypertensive agents. The issues in perspective.

Authors:  P A Meredith
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Antihypertensive effect of once daily sustained release isradipine: a placebo controlled cross-over study.

Authors:  F Arzilli; E Gandolfi; C Del Prato; P Innocenti; F Ponzanelli; A Caiazza; F Ghisoni; P Saba; F Giuntoli; C Borgnino
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  The 24-hour efficacy of a new once-daily formulation of nifedipine. Italian Nifedipine GITS Study Group.

Authors:  A Zanchetti
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  A comparative assessment of amlodipine and felodipine ER: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic indices.

Authors:  A D Bainbridge; O Herlihy; P A Meredith; H L Elliott
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Effectiveness of hydrochlorothiazide in combination with telmisartan and olmesartan in adults with moderate hypertension not controlled with monotherapy: a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point (PROBE), parallel-arm study.

Authors:  Roberto Fogari; Annalisa Zoppi; Amedeo Mugellini; Paola Preti; Maurizio Destro; Andrea Rinaldi; Giuseppe Derosa
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2008-02

Review 8.  Lacidipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential in the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  C R Lee; H M Bryson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and selective pharmacodynamics of new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors: an update.

Authors:  Jessica C Song; C Michael White
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.577

10.  24-Hour blood pressure response to lower dose (30 mg) fimasartan in Korean patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.

Authors:  Hae-Young Lee; Cheol-Ho Kim; Jae-Kwan Song; Shung Chull Chae; Myung Ho Jeong; Dong-Soo Kim; Byung-Hee Oh
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.884

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.