Literature DB >> 24072440

Preventing overexploitation in a mutualism: partner regulation in the crayfish-branchiobdellid symbiosis.

Kaitlin J Farrell1, Robert P Creed, Bryan L Brown.   

Abstract

For a symbiosis to be a mutualism, benefits received must exceed costs incurred for both partners. Partners can prevent costly overexploitation through behaviors that moderate interactions with the other symbiont. In a symbiosis between crayfish and branchiobdellidan annelids, the worms can increase crayfish survival and growth by removing fouling material from the gills. However, overexploitation by the worms is possible and results in damage to host gills. We used behavioral observations to assess the degree to which two species of crayfish (Cambarus chasmodactylus and Orconectes cristavarius) use grooming to moderate their interaction with branchiobdellids. We found that grooming could effectively reduce worm numbers, and the proportion of total grooming directed at worms differed between crayfish species and as a function of worm number. O. cristavarius increased grooming in response to the addition of a single worm, while C. chasmodactylus only increased grooming in response to ten worms. These differences in the number of worms that trigger grooming behavior reflect differences between crayfish species in field settings. We also assessed whether antibacterial compounds in circulating crayfish hemolymph could limit bacterial gill fouling. O. cristavarius hemolymph inhibited some test bacteria more effectively than C. chasmodactylus did. Differences in the antibacterial properties of crayfish hemolymph may therefore help explain differences in both worm-directed grooming and worm loads in the field. We conclude that crayfish can use grooming to reduce worm numbers, which could lower the potential for gill damage, and that the level of grooming varies between crayfish species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24072440     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-013-2780-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  13 in total

1.  The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Cleaner wrasse prefer client mucus: support for partner control mechanisms in cleaning interactions.

Authors:  Alexandra S Grutter; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Crustins, homologues of an 11.5-kDa antibacterial peptide, from two species of penaeid shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei and Litopenaeus setiferus.

Authors:  Thomas C Bartlett; Brandon J Cuthbertson; Eleanor F Shepard; Robert W Chapman; Paul S Gross; Gregory W Warr
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  The fine line between mutualism and parasitism: complex effects in a cleaning symbiosis demonstrated by multiple field experiments.

Authors:  Bryan L Brown; Robert P Creed; James Skelton; Mark A Rollins; Kaitlin J Farrell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Habitat heterogeneity and activity of an omnivorous ecosystem engineer control stream community dynamics.

Authors:  Bryan L Brown; Raven L Lawson
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Commensalism or mutualism: conditional outcomes in a branchiobdellid-crayfish symbiosis.

Authors:  Ju Hyung Lee; Tae Won Kim; Jae Chun Choe
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions.

Authors:  J L Bronstein
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Antibacterial peptides in hemocytes and hematopoietic tissue from freshwater crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus: characterization and expression pattern.

Authors:  Pikul Jiravanichpaisal; So Young Lee; Young-A Kim; Tove Andrén; Irene Söderhäll
Journal:  Dev Comp Immunol       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Mutualism or parasitism? The variable outcome of cleaning symbioses.

Authors:  Karen L Cheney; Isabelle M Côté
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Interactions between red-billed oxpeckers, Buphagus erythrorhynchus, and domestic cattle, Bos taurus, in Zimbabwe.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.844

View more
  3 in total

1.  A symbiont's dispersal strategy: condition-dependent dispersal underlies predictable variation in direct transmission among hosts.

Authors:  James Skelton; Robert P Creed; Bryan L Brown
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The potential impacts of invasions on native symbionts.

Authors:  Robert P Creed; Bryan L Brown; James Skelton
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 6.431

3.  Reduced aggression and foraging efficiency of invasive signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) infested with non-native branchiobdellidans (Annelida: Clitellata).

Authors:  J James; K E Davidson; G Richardson; C Grimstead; J Cable
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.876

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.