Literature DB >> 24071617

Incidence, predictors, and outcome of difficult mask ventilation combined with difficult laryngoscopy: a report from the multicenter perioperative outcomes group.

Sachin Kheterpal1, David Healy, Michael F Aziz, Amy M Shanks, Robert E Freundlich, Fiona Linton, Lizabeth D Martin, Jonathan Linton, Jerry L Epps, Ana Fernandez-Bustamante, Leslie C Jameson, Tyler Tremper, Kevin K Tremper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research regarding difficult mask ventilation (DMV) combined with difficult laryngoscopy (DL) is extremely limited even though each technique serves as a rescue for one another.
METHODS: Four tertiary care centers participating in the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group used a consistent structured patient history and airway examination and airway outcome definition. DMV was defined as grade 3 or 4 mask ventilation, and DL was defined as grade 3 or 4 laryngoscopic view or four or more intubation attempts. The primary outcome was DMV combined with DL. Patients with the primary outcome were compared to those without the primary outcome to identify predictors of DMV combined with DL using a non-parsimonious logistic regression.
RESULTS: Of 492,239 cases performed at four institutions among adult patients, 176,679 included a documented face mask ventilation and laryngoscopy attempt. Six hundred ninety-eight patients experienced the primary outcome, an overall incidence of 0.40%. One patient required an emergent cricothyrotomy, 177 were intubated using direct laryngoscopy, 284 using direct laryngoscopy with bougie introducer, 163 using videolaryngoscopy, and 73 using other techniques. Independent predictors of the primary outcome included age 46 yr or more, body mass index 30 or more, male sex, Mallampati III or IV, neck mass or radiation, limited thyromental distance, sleep apnea, presence of teeth, beard, thick neck, limited cervical spine mobility, and limited jaw protrusion (c-statistic 0.84 [95% CI, 0.82-0.87]).
CONCLUSION: DMV combined with DL is an infrequent but not rare phenomenon. Most patients can be managed with the use of direct or videolaryngoscopy. An easy to use unweighted risk scale has robust discriminating capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24071617     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000435832.39353.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  67 in total

Review 1.  [S1 guidelines on airway management].

Authors:  T Piepho; E Cavus; R Noppens; C Byhahn; V Dörges; B Zwissler; A Timmermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  S1 guidelines on airway management : Guideline of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  T Piepho; E Cavus; R Noppens; C Byhahn; V Dörges; B Zwissler; A Timmermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.041

3. 

Authors:  Berrin Günaydın; Ömer Kurtipek
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-06-01

4.  [66-year-old male with laparoscopic hemicolectomy : Preparation for the medical specialist examination: Part 6].

Authors:  T Piepho
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  [Intubating laryngeal tube suction disposable: Initial clinical experiences with a novel device for endotracheal intubation].

Authors:  M N Bergold; S Kahle; T Schultzik; M Bücheler; C Byhahn
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  JSA airway management guideline 2014: to improve the safety of induction of anesthesia.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 7.  Anaesthetic management of acute airway obstruction.

Authors:  Patrick Wong; Jolin Wong; May Un Sam Mok
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 8.  Perioperative Information Systems: Opportunities to Improve Delivery of Care and Clinical Outcomes in Cardiac and Vascular Surgery.

Authors:  Robert E Freundlich; Jesse M Ehrenfeld
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  Sugammadex versus Neostigmine for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (STRONGER): A Multicenter Matched Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Sachin Kheterpal; Michelle T Vaughn; Timur Z Dubovoy; Nirav J Shah; Lori D Bash; Douglas A Colquhoun; Amy M Shanks; Michael R Mathis; Roy G Soto; Amit Bardia; Karsten Bartels; Patrick J McCormick; Robert B Schonberger; Leif Saager
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 10.  The Bariatric Patient in the Intensive Care Unit: Pitfalls and Management.

Authors:  Carlos E Pompilio; Paolo Pelosi; Melina G Castro
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.