| Literature DB >> 24070648 |
Azza A Abou-Hussein1, Wolfgang Linert.
Abstract
Two series of mono- and binuclear complexes cyclic or acyclic thio-ferocine Schiff base ligands, derived from the condensation of 2-aminobenzenthiol (L) with monoacetyl ferrocene in the molar ratio 1:1 or in the molar ratio 1:2 for diacetyl ferocine have been prepared. The condensation reactions yield the corresponding Schiff Base ligands, HLa-Maf and H2Lb-Daf. The chelation of the ligands to metal ions occurs through the sulfur of the thiol group as well as the nitrogen atoms of the azomethine group of the ligands. HLa-Maf acts as monobasic bidentate or dibasic tetradentate, while H2Lb-Daf behaves as twice negatively cargend tetradentate ligand. The structures of these ligands were elucidated by elemental analysis, infrared, ultraviolet-visible spectra, as well as (1)H NMR spectra. Reactions of the Schiff bases ligands with ruthenium(III), oxovanadium(IV) and dioxouranium(VI) afforded the corresponding transition metal complexes. The properties of the newly prepared complexes were analyse by elemental analyses, infrared, electronic spectra, (1)H NMR as well as the magnetic susceptibility and conductivity measurement. The metal complexes exhibits different geometrical arrangements such as octahedral and square pyramidal coordination. Schiff base ligands and their metal complexes were tested against two pathogenic bacteria as Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria as well as one kind of fungi to study their biological activity. All the complexes exhibit antibacterial and antifungal activities against these organisms.Entities:
Keywords: 1,1′-Diacetylferrocene; Biological activity; Metal complexes; Monoacetylferrocene; Spectroscopy; Thio-Schiff base
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24070648 PMCID: PMC3826106 DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2013.06.078
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc ISSN: 1386-1425 Impact factor: 4.098
Physicochemical properties of the Schiff base HLa(Maf), H2Lb(Daf) ligands and their transition metal complexes.
| Ligand/complex | M.F. | M.Wt. | Yield (%) | Color | D.P. °C | Elemental analysis, Calc. (found) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| %C | %H | %N | %M | ||||||
| C18H17FeNS | 335.043 | 68.97 | Orange | 173 | 64.46 | 5.11 | 4.17 | – | |
| (64.21) | (5.41) | (3.94) | |||||||
| (1)[Ru(La-Maf)(Cl)2(H2O)2]·H2O | C18H22Cl2FeNO3RuS | 559.909 | 58.76 | Black | >250 | 38.57 | 3.95 | 2.50 | 18.20 |
| (38.28) | (3.47) | (2.75) | (18.93) | ||||||
| (2)[VO(La-Maf)(OAc)(H2O)]·H2O | C20H23FeNO5SV | 496.008 | 58.48 | Green | >250 | 48.38 | 4.67 | 2.82 | 10.27 |
| (48.73) | (4.16) | (2.53) | (9.96) | ||||||
| (3)[UO2(La-Maf)(H2O)2]·NO3 | C18H20FeN2O7SU | 702.084 | 67.56 | Orange | >250 | 30.76 | 2.87 | 3.98 | 33.90 |
| (30.47) | (2.59) | (3.47) | (34.43) | ||||||
| (4)[Ru(La-Maf)2(H2O)2]·H2O·Cl | C36H38ClFe2N2O3RuS2 | 858.975 | 65.43 | Black | >250 | 50.29 | 4.45 | 3.26 | 11.86 |
| (50.74) | (4.86) | (3.82) | (12.31) | ||||||
| (5)[VO(La-Maf)2H2O]·H2O | C36H36Fe2N2O3S2V | 771.030 | 64.83 | Green | >250 | 56.02 | 4.70 | 3.63 | 6.60 |
| (56.49) | (4.56) | (3.27) | (6.92) | ||||||
| (6)[UO2(La-Maf)2]·3H2O | C36H38Fe2 N2O5S2U | 992.142 | 72.43 | Orange | >250 | 43.54 | 3.86 | 2.82 | 23.99 |
| (43.16) | (3.37) | (2.64) | (23.86) | ||||||
| C26H24FeN2S2 | 484.46 | 62.46 | Broun | 187 | 64.46 | 4.99 | 5.78 | – | |
| (64.83) | (4.56) | (5.37) | |||||||
| (7)[Ru(Lb-Daf)(Cl)(H2O)]·H2O | C26H26ClFeN2O2RuS2 | 654.951 | 54.82 | Black | >250 | 47.63 | 4.00 | 4.27 | 15.55 |
| (47.18) | (4.45) | (4.69) | (14.35) | ||||||
| (8)[VO(Lb-Daf)]·2H2O | C26H26FeN2O3S2V | 585.01 | 66.21 | Black | >250 | 53.33 | 4.47 | 4.78 | 8.70 |
| (53.77) | (4.73) | (4.28) | (8.25) | ||||||
| (9)[UO2(Lb-Daf)]·2H2O | C26H26FeN2O4S2U | 788.119 | 57.11 | Orange | >250 | 39.58 | 3.32 | 3.55 | 30.20 |
| (39.14) | (3.34) | (3.78) | (30.58) | ||||||
| (10)[Ru2(Lb-Daf)(Cl)4(H2O)2]·H2O | C26H28Cl2FeN2O3Ru2S2 | 809.835 | 67.57 | Black | >250 | 38.52 | 3.48 | 3.45 | 25.16 |
| (38.73) | (3.74) | (3.63) | (26.28) | ||||||
| (11)[(VO)2(Lb-Daf)(H2O)2]·2H2O | C26H30FeN2O6S2V2 | 687.977 | 58.46 | Dark green | >250 | 45.35 | 4.39 | 4.07 | 14.80 |
| (45.26) | (4.64) | (4.46) | (14.47) | ||||||
| (12)[(UO2)2(Lb-Daf) (H2O)4]·2NO3 | C26H30FeN4O14S2U2 | 1218.15 | 56.68 | Orange | >250 | 25.61 | 2.48 | 4.59 | 39.08 |
| (25.37) | (2.63) | (4.16) | (38.27) | ||||||
Infrared frequencies of the main characteristic bands of the Schiff base ligand HLa-(Maf), H2Lb-(Daf) and transition metal complexes.
| Ligand/complex | Other assignments | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLa(Maf) | – | 1655s | 2586 m | 1263 m | 764 m | – | – | – | |
| ( | [Ru(La-Maf)(Cl)2(H2O)2]·H2O | 3350 br | 1642 s | – | 1243 m | 751 m | 435 m | 374 m | 326 |
| ( | [VO(La-Maf)(OAc) H2O]·H2O | 3445 s, br | 1645 s | – | 1246 m | 756 m | 446 m | 364 m | 1575 |
| Unidentate (Ac−) group | |||||||||
| ( | [UO2(La-Maf)(H2O)2]·NO3 | 3378 s | 1634 s | – | 1254 m | 752 m | 440 m | 381 m | 1383s, 856 m ionic NO3, |
| ( | [Ru(La-Maf)2(H2O)2]·H2O·Cl | 3500 s, br | 1647 s | – | 1258 m | 758s | 463 m | 366 m | Ionic complex |
| ( | [VO(La-Maf)2H2O]·H2O | 3426 s, br | 1639 s | – | 1249 m | 760s | 464 m | 364 m | 970s, 958 m |
| ( | [UO2(La-Maf)2]·3H2O | 3356 s, br | 1640 s | – | 1246 m | 756s | 446 m | 366 m | 910 m, 897 |
| H2Lb(Daf) | – | 1663s | 2586 m | 1257 m | 746s | – | – | – | |
| ( | [Ru(Lb-Daf)(Cl)(H2O)]H2O | 3446 s | 1658 s | – | 1143 m | 792 m | 467 m | 367 m | 346, |
| ( | [VO(Lb-Daf)]·2H2O | 3503 s,br | 1655 s | – | 1140 m | 816 m | 453 m | 363 m | 976s, 985 m |
| ( | [UO2(Lb-Daf)]·2H2O | 3458 s, br | 1658 s | – | 1142 m | 826 m | 460 m | 386 m | 915 m, 890 |
| ( | [Ru2(Lb-Daf)(Cl)4(H2O)2]·H2O | 3452 s, br | 1656 s | – | 1148 m | 835 m | 458 m | – | 335 |
| ( | [(VO)2(Lb-Daf)(H2O)2]·2H2O | 3428s,br | 1644 s | – | 1147 m | 786 m | 456 m | 376 m | 973s, 989 m |
| ( | [(UO2)2(Lb-Daf) (H2O)4]·2NO3 | 3464s | 1641m | – | 1150 m | 791 m | 465 m | 362 m | 1383 s, 856 m ionic NO3 group |
s = strong, w = weak, m = medium, and br = broad,
Electronic absorption bands (nm), magnetic moments (B.M.) and molar conductivities (Ω−1 cm2 mol−1) transition metal complexes.
| Complex | Electronic absorption bands their assignment, magnetic moments and molar conductivities | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | |||||
| ( | [Ru(La-Maf)(Cl)2(H2O)2]·H2O | 643(0.22) | 2T2g → 2A2g( | 1.77 | 36 |
| ( | [VO(La-Maf)(OAc)(H2O)]·H2O | 724(0.38) | 2B1g → 2Eg( | 1.71 | 18 |
| ( | [UO2(La-Maf)(H2O)2]·NO3 | 532(0.32) | Charge Transfer | __ | 112 |
| ( | [Ru(La-Maf)2(H2O)2]·H2O·Cl | 652(0,34) | 2T2g → 2A2g( | 1.73 | 103 |
| ( | [VO(La-Maf)2H2O]·H2O | 733(0.47) | 2B1g → 2Eg( | 1.86 | 28 |
| ( | [UO2(La-Maf)2]·3H2O | 538(0.37) | Charge Transfer | __ | 37 |
| ( | [Ru(Lb-Daf)(Cl)(H2O)]H2O | 663(0.52) | 2T2g → 2A2g( | 1.75 | 19 |
| ( | [VO(Lb-Daf)]·2H2O | 736(0.29) | 2B1g → 2Eg( | 1.74 | 33 |
| ( | [UO2(Lb-Daf)]·2H2O | 545(0.82) | ChargeTransfer | __ | 42 |
| ( | [Ru2(Lb-Daf)(Cl)4(H2O)2]·H2O | 656(0.51) | 2T2g → 2A2g( | 1.53 | 35 |
| ( | [(VO)2(Lb-Daf)(H2O)2]·2H2O | 743(0.35) | 2B2 → 2E( | __ | 18 |
| ( | [(UO2)2(Lb-Daf) (H2O)4]·2NO3 | 546(0.56) | Charge Transfer | __ | 136 |
Absorption maxima in nm; molar absorptivities given in parentheses given in 104 Lmol-1cm-1.
Molar conductance (Ω−1 cm2 mol−1) was measured in 10−3 mol−1 DMF solvent.
1H NMR chemical shifts (δ, ppm) of the Schiff base, HLa-Maf and H2Lb-Maf, ligands and their UO2(IV) complexes (3) and (9).
| Assignment | Chemical shift, | Complexes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLa-Maf | H2Lb-Daf | 3, [UO2(LaMaf)( | 9,[UO2(Lb-Daf)]2H2O | |||
| 1 | H(a) | [s,3H, CH3] | [2.23] | – | [2.53] | – |
| 2 | H(a′) | [s,6H, 2CH3] | – | [2.18] | – | [2.23] |
| 3 | H(b) | [s,1H-SH] | [3.52] | – | – | – |
| 4 | H(b′) | [s,2H-SH] | – | [3.48] | – | – |
| 5 | H(c, d) | [s,2H,Cp-H] | [4.74] | – | [4.75] | – |
| 6 | H(e, f) | [s,2H,Cp-H] | [4.33] | – | [4.31] | – |
| 7 | H(g, h, i, j, | [s,5H,Cp(C5H5)] | [4.06] | – | [4.08] | – |
| 8 | H(c′,g′)(d′,h′)′)(f′,j′)′)(d′,h′) | [m,8H,Cp2(C5H4)] | – | [4.82,4.78,4.62,4.45] | – | [4.82,4.79,4.62,4.43] |
| 9 | H(l, m, n, o) | [m,4H, Ar—H] | [6.77–7.48] | – | [6.63–7.77] | – |
| H(l′,m′,n′,o′) | [m,8H, Ar—H] | – | [6.67–7.42] | – | [6.61–7.46] | |
s = singlet; m = multiple, Cp = cyclopentiene ring.
Signal due to coordinated water overlapped with Cp ring.
Fig. 1Representative structures of the metal complexes of the Schiff base, HLa-Maf.
Fig. 2Representative structures of the metal complexes of the Schiff base, H2Lb-Daf.
Antimicrobial activity of HLa-Maf and H2Lb-Maf, ligands and their complexes.
| Compound | Mean of zone diamete, mm mg mL−1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gram-positive bacteria | Gram-negative bacteria | Fungi | |
| 40 ± 0.4 | 34 ± 0.2 | 36 ± 0.1 | |
| (1)[Ru(La-Maf)(Cl)2(H2O)2]·H2O | 19 ± 0.1 | 21 ± 0.2 | 19 ± 0.2 |
| (2)[VO(La-Maf)(OAc)(H2O)]·H2O | 17 ± 0.2 | 20 ± 0.2 | 20 ± 0.2 |
| (3)[UO2(La-Maf)(H2O)2]·NO3 | 16 ± 0.1 | 18 ± 0.3 | 18 ± 0.2 |
| (4)[Ru(La-Maf)2(H2O)2]·H2O·Cl | 38 ± 0.1 | 35 ± 0.3 | 36 ± 0.3 |
| (5)[VO(La-Maf)2H2O]·H2O | 32 ± 0.2 | 33 ± 0.1 | 36 ± 0.2 |
| (6)[UO2(La-Maf)2]·3H2O | 37 ± 0.2 | 32 ± 0.3 | 33 ± 0.2 |
| 31 ± 0.4 | 30 ± 0.2 | 30 ± 0.1 | |
| (7)[Ru(Lb-Daf)(Cl)(H2O)] H2O | 19 ± 0.2 | 17 ± 0.1 | 16 ± 0.3 |
| (8)[VO(Lb-Daf)]·2H2O | 20 ± 0.1 | 18 ± 0.1 | 17 ± 0.3 |
| (9)[UO2(Lb-Daf)]·2H2O | 17 ± 0.2 | 19 ± 0.1 | 21 ± 0.3 |
| (10)[Ru2(Lb-Daf)(Cl)4(H2O)2]·H2O | 26 ± 0.2 | 24 ± 0.1 | 27 ± 0.2 |
| (11)[(VO)2(Lb-Daf)(H2O)2]·2H2O | 23 ± 0.2 | 26 ± 0.3 | 23 ± 0.2 |
| (12)[(UO2)2(Lb-Daf) (H2O)4]·2NO3 | 25 ± 0.2 | 24 ± 0.3 | 25 ± 0.2 |
Calculated from three average values.
Chloramphencol in the case of Gram-positive bacteria, Cephalothin in the case of Gram-negative bacteria and Cycloheximide in the case of fungi.
Error limits, ±.
Control.