Literature DB >> 24069180

WINROP identifies severe retinopathy of prematurity at an early stage in a nation-based cohort of extremely preterm infants.

Pia Lundgren1, Elisabeth Stoltz Sjöström, Magnus Domellöf, Karin Källen, Gerd Holmström, Anna-Lena Hård, Lois E Smith, Chatarina Löfqvist, Ann Hellström.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of a postnatal weight-gain algorithm (WINROP) to identify sight-threatening retinopathy of prematurity (ROP type 1) in a nation-based extremely preterm infant cohort.
METHODS: This study enrolled all 707 live-born extremely preterm (gestational age [GA] <27 weeks) infants, born 2004-2007 in Sweden; the Extremely preterm Infants in Sweden Study (EXPRESS). WINROP analysis was performed retrospectively in 407 of the infants using weekly weight gain to assess the preterm infant's risk of developing ROP type 1 requiring treatment. GA, birthweight (BW), and weekly postnatal weight measurements were entered into WINROP. WINROP signals with an alarm to indicate if the preterm infant is at risk for ROP type 1.
RESULTS: In this extremely preterm population, WINROP correctly identified 96% (45/47) of the infants who required treatment for ROP type 1. The median time from alarm to treatment was 9 weeks (range, 4-20 weeks).
CONCLUSIONS: WINROP, an online surveillance system using weekly weight gain, identified extremely preterm infants at risk for ROP type 1 requiring treatment at an early stage and with high sensitivity in a Swedish nation-based cohort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24069180      PMCID: PMC3771982          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

A significant improvement in survival amongst the most preterm infants has been noted during the past 15 years [1]. Improved perinatal and neonatal care has lowered the limit of viability to a gestational age (GA) of 22–23 weeks in countries with high-quality neonatal intensive care units (NICU) [2]. Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a potentially sight-threatening disease affecting premature infants [3]. Due to pathologic neovascularization of the retina after preterm birth, the most severe form of ROP (ROP type 1) may lead to retinal detachment and blindness if untreated [4]. To identify infants in need of treatment, repeated eye examinations must be performed until the retina is fully vascularized. ROP eye examinations are one of the more stressful and painful procedures preterm infants are subjected to, even when performed by an experienced ophthalmologist [5]. A population-based study of extremely preterm infants in Sweden (EXPRESS) with a GA <27 weeks recently reported that 20% of extremely preterm infants require treatment [6]. Poor postnatal weight gain during the first weeks of life is a strong predictor for the development of sight-threatening ROP type 1 [7-14]. The online monitoring tool, WINROP, developed in Gothenburg, Sweden, is based on longitudinal weekly weight measurements and indicates with an alarm if the preterm infant is at risk of developing sight-threatening ROP. The WINROP monitoring tool was introduced and evaluated with satisfactory results in different preterm populations worldwide [13,15,16]. These studies have all retrospectively included both very and extremely preterm infants. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate WINROP in a Swedish nation-based extremely preterm cohort.

Study Population and Methods

Study population

In EXPRESS, all infants born in Sweden before 27 weeks of gestation between April 1, 2004 and March 31, 2007 were included. EXPRESS is a nationwide project initiated by the Swedish Association of Perinatology and the Swedish National Board of Health and Social Welfare. The aim of EXPRESS is to determine morbidity and mortality rates in extremely premature infants. Comprehensive obstetric and neonatal data were collected prospectively. GA at birth was calculated using ultrasound examinations performed before 20 weeks of gestation. Weight data of every infant throughout their hospital stay was retrieved from hospital records. Screening for ROP was separately organized and the methods, examination, techniques, and results regarding incidence, treatment, natural history, and screening have been described previously [6,17,18]. During the study period, 707 infants were born alive and these infants were included in our study (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Flowchart of the study population.

WINROP use requires that the infant’s GA is from 23 to 32 gestational weeks at birth, weekly weight measurements, and physiological weight gain of <450 g/week. Infants with hydrocephalus must be excluded owing to their expected non-physiological excessive weight gain. Infants who died before 40 weeks of postmenstrual age (PMA) were excluded (n=197) as ROP grading could be incomplete in these infants. Four infants born at GA 22 weeks were excluded. Infants without weekly weight measurements up to 32 weeks PMA were excluded (n=81). Infants who were diagnosed with hydrocephalus (n=18) were excluded. Finally, 407 infants met the criteria for the WINROP analysis (Figure 1).

ROP examination and treatment

ROP screening started during the fifth postnatal week and continued until the retina was fully vascularized or until regression of ROP [18]. The eye examinations were performed according to routine protocol, and consisted of dilated ocular fundus examinations. The results of screening examinations were entered into a study screening protocol. For classification of ROP, the International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity revisited was used [19]. The recommendations of the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group were followed for treatment [20]. According to these recommendations, ROP type 1 requiring treatment is defined as any stage of ROP in zone I with plus disease; ROP stage 3 in zone I, with or without plus disease; and ROP in zone II, stage 2 or 3 with plus disease. In this study, we evaluated the ability of WINROP to predict ROP type 1. Data regarding maximum ROP in the worst eye and eventual treatment were retrieved from the EXPRESS.

WINROP screening

The online surveillance system WINROP uses longitudinal weekly weight gain to identify infants at risk of developing ROP type 1. Each infant’s GA, birthweight (BW), and weekly postnatal weights; from birth until an alarm is signalled or to a postmenstrual age of 35 to 36 weeks, were retrospectively entered into WINROP by a person unaware of ROP outcome. The WINROP algorithm estimates the differences between expected safe weekly weight gain and the weight gain observed, and the values are calculated and accumulated. When the accumulated sum exceeds a limit, an alarm is signalled to indicate that the infant is at risk for severe ROP. The WINROP outcome is either no alarm or alarm. When the infant had a record of several weekly weights available, we chose to enter the weight data closest to a 7 day interval.

Statistical analysis

The negative and positive predictive values were calculated using the sensitivity, specificity, and prevalence of ROP type 1 for the study group. 95% confidence interval (CIs) was calculated.

Ethics Statement

The study was approved by the Regional Research Ethics Board, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. The parents provided oral informed consent for data acquisition.

Results

High prevalence of ROP in the extremely preterm population

In this population, 54% (219/407) were male. The median BW was 784 grams (range, 348–1315 grams), and the median GA was 25 weeks and 4 days (range 23+0/7 to 26+6/7) (Table 1). ROP was diagnosed in 69.0% (281/407) of the infants. ROP stages 1–2 developed in 39.8% (162/407). ROP stage 3, not included in ROP type 1, was diagnosed in 17.7% (72/407) and ROP type 1 in 11.5% (47/407). All infants with ROP type 1 received treatment (47/47) as well as 26.4% (19/72) of the infants with ROP stage 3 (Table 1). No infant was treated before a PMA of 32 weeks. The infants’ median PMA when receiving first treatment was 36 weeks (range, 32–47 weeks).
Table 1

Alarm Signal in Relation to ROP Categories and Birth Characteristics.

Alarm status
No alarm n=88 Alarm n=319 All infants n=407
Birth characteristics, median (range)
GA, weeks+days 26+2/725+3/725+4/7
(23+3/7 to 26+6/7)(23+0/7 to 26+6/7)(23+0/7 to 26+6/7)
BW, g 978 (714–1315)740 (348–1130)784 (348–1315)
Sex, males n=219 63% (56/88)51% (163/319)54% (219/407)
Infants, No. (%)88 (21.6%)319 (78.4%)407
No ROP 38 (30.2%)88 (69.8%)126 (31.0%)
ROP stages 1 & 2 38 (23.5%)124 (76.5%)162 (39.8%)
ROP stage 3 10 (13.9%)62 (86.1%)72 (17.7%)
Type 1 ROP 2 (4.3%)45 (95.7%)47 (11.5%)
Treated 4 (6.1%)62 (93.9%)66 (16.2%)

Abbreviations: BW, birth weight; GA, gestational age; ROP, retinopathy of prematurity.

Abbreviations: BW, birth weight; GA, gestational age; ROP, retinopathy of prematurity.

WINROP identifies extremely preterm infants at risk of ROP type 1 with high sensitivity

An alarm was signalled in 78.4% (319/407) of all infants and in 95.7% (45/47) of the infants with ROP type 1 (Figure 2). The specificity was 23.9% (86/360). The negative predictive was value 97.7% and the positive predictive value 14.1% (Table 2).
Figure 2

Flowchart of WINROP outcomes.

Table 2

WINROP Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Values in Identifying Type 1 ROP.

Alarm status
% (95%CI)
Alarm
No Alarm
Total   Sensitivity
Specificity
ROP categories, No. of infants
Type 1 ROP 45247 95.7 (84.3-99.2) 23.9 (19.6-28.7)
Non-type 1 ROP 27486360
Total 319 88 407
Predictive value, % (95%CI)
PPV 14.1 (10.5-18.5)
NPV 97.7 (91.2-99.6)

Abbreviations: NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; ROP, retinopathy of prematurity.

Abbreviations: NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; ROP, retinopathy of prematurity. WINROP did not signal an alarm in two infants diagnosed and treated for ROP type 1. Both infants had a complicated clinical course. One had a partial bowel obstruction, long-term parenteral nutrition and antibiotic treatment, and received treatment at the PMA of 36 weeks. The second infant had severe respiratory insufficiency, with excessive oxygen treatment and intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) grade 4. This infant was treated in only one eye for ROP type 1 at a PMA of 37 weeks. WINROP did not signal with an alarm in two infants with ROP stage 3 (ROP type 2; ROP stage 3 in zone II without plus disease) who were treated. One of these infants was only treated in one eye (Table 3).
Table 3

Characteristics of Infants Treated for ROP but not Signalling a WINROP Alarm.

Infants GA (weeks+days) BW Time at treatment & ROP type Clinical Course
#1 25+1/7960gPMA 37 weeks ROP type 1Partial bowel obstruction and long-term parenteral nutrition.
#2 25+3/7936gPMA 38 weeks ROP type 1 One eye treated.Severe hospital course, excessive oxygen treatment, IVH 4
#3 26+3/71010gPMA 36 weeks ROP type 2No severe complications
#4 26+4/7910gPMA 37 weeks ROP type 2, One eye treatedNo severe complications

Abbreviations: BW, birth weight; GA, gestational age; IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage; PMA, postmenstrual age; ROP, retinopathy of prematurity

Abbreviations: BW, birth weight; GA, gestational age; IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage; PMA, postmenstrual age; ROP, retinopathy of prematurity

WINROP sends an early signal when the infant is at risk of developing ROP type 1

The median time from birth to alarm was 3 weeks (range 1–10 weeks). The infants with ROP type 1 who received an alarm had a median time from alarm to first treatment of 9 weeks (range 4–20 weeks) (Figure 3). The infants received their alarm at least 4 weeks before their treatment.
Figure 3

Time from birth to the WINROP alarm (A) and time from the alarm to treatment (infants with ROP type 1) (B).

Discussion

In this first nation based study, WINROP identified extremely preterm infants with ROP type 1 with high sensitivity (95.7%). The extremely preterm infant is at high risk of developing ROP, but also extremely fragile. Every intervention and investigation must be carefully considered before being implemented owing to the infant’s vulnerability. The ROP eye examination is a painful and stressful procedure [21]. Changes in oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and heart rate measured during the examination can be signs of distress [22]. Todays established screening criteria; GA and BW results in numerous unnecessary eye examinations to identify the approximately 20% of extreme preterm infants in need of treatment. Although it is crucial to correctly identify infants who require treatment, it would be beneficial if infants not in need of treatment could be spared at least some stressful examinations. In the present cohort a mean of 11 eye examinations (range 2–30) were performed/infant. The infants with no ROP and no alarm had a mean of 6 examinations/ infant. If infants with no alarm and no ROP in this cohort would have received routine ROP examination at three time points; PMA 31 weeks, PMA 33 weeks and PMA 36 weeks these infants number of examinations would have been reduced by 53% (130/244). Even though the number of examinations spared in the whole cohort is limited, for the individual infant, with no alarm and no ROP, a reduction of half of their examinations could result in an important improvement in their well-being. Infants that develop ROP without previous alarm must, of course, depending on the severity of their ROP, be examined according to clinical judgement and present screening recommendations. Two of the infants with ROP type 1 requiring treatment did not signal an alarm. The main characteristics of these infants were their severely complicated clinical courses. Thus, when using WINROP to complement established screening schedules, the clinical judgment regarding the infants’ risk of developing severe ROP must always supersede the WINROP outcome. In this study the sensitivity was 95.7% similar to previously performed studies in Sweden [11,12]. The specificity of 23.9% was lower than in previously performed studies in Sweden as well as in Canada, the U.S, Brazil and Korea [11-13,16,23,24]. The reason for this finding is most likely that the present study includes a cohort of extremely premature infants, who have the poorest postnatal weight development and thus are more likely to signal an alarm in WINROP. In this study, the WINROP alarm signalled weeks/months before the development of severe ROP, giving the neonatologist and the ophthalmologist an early prediction of the infant’s future. In addition to being a sight-threatening disease, the severity of ROP is also associated with later neurologic impairment and even death [25,26]. Severe ROP and poor early postnatal growth is a multifactorial complication in the preterm infant. Maximal nutritional support/improved weight gain and interventions for high risk infants may reduce the infants’ long term impairment associated with prematurity [27]. Other considerable risk factors for developing ROP are low IGF-1 levels [28], poor nutritional intake [27], hyperglycaemia [29,30], insulin treatment [31], corticosteroid treatment [31], insufficient intake of DHA [32] and, of course, fluctuating/high oxygen concentrations [33]. An interesting study by Pawlik et al supplementing preterm infants with omega 3 fatty acids demonstrated positive effects on ROP outcome [34]; however, no information regarding weight gain was provided in that report. In addition, there are on-going preventative studies evaluating supplementing preterm infants with DHA/EPA (EU-nr 2008-000046-31) and IGF-I (ClinicalTrials.gov Id: NCT01096784) in an attempt to improve postnatal growth and normalize retinal angiogenesis. The strength of this study is that for the first time the WINROP surveillance system have been evaluated in a nation-based cohort. This is also the first time WINROP has been evaluated in a cohort of selectively extremely preterm infant. A limitation of this study is that the WINROP algorithm not yet have been developed for infants born at a GA of 22 weeks, consequently these infants had to be excluded from this study. Further development and validations of the WINROP algorithm have to be made before the infants born at a GA of 22 weeks can be included in the surveillance system. Another limitation in this study is the number of infants excluded, 16% (81/506), due to missing weekly weights < 32 GA weeks. These excluded infants were more immature than the participating infants; their median GA was 25 week and 1 day and their median BW was 730 g. One reason to this finding could be that more immature infants have higher morbidity and weekly weight measurement is not always possible to perform due to the infants’ severe illness. Since we have no data about the infants’ morbidity we can only speculate that this is the reason to the 16% of infants excluded due to missing weekly weight measurements. The web-based weight-monitoring ROP screening tool, WINROP identified infants at high risk of sight-threatening ROP type 1 at an early stage in this population-based cohort of extremely preterm infants. Using WINROP to supplement traditional ROP screening programs could significantly reduce the number of stressful eye examinations for extremely preterm infants who do not signal a WINROP alarm.
  34 in total

1.  Maternal and neonatal factors associated with poor early weight gain and later retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Margareta Hök Wikstrand; Anna-Lena Hård; Aimon Niklasson; Lois Smith; Chatarina Löfqvist; Ann Hellström
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 2.299

2.  [The early postnatal weight gain as a predictor of retinopathy of prematurity].

Authors:  S Flückiger; H U Bucher; A Hellström; C Lövqist; V Sturm; S J Arri
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 0.700

3.  Impact at age 11 years of major neonatal morbidities in children born extremely preterm.

Authors:  Aijaz Farooqi; Bruno Hägglöf; Gunnar Sedin; Fredrik Serenius
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Hyperglycemia, insulin and slower growth velocity may increase the risk of retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  J W Kaempf; A J Kaempf; Y Wu; M Stawarz; J Niemeyer; G Grunkemeier
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Fish-oil fat emulsion supplementation may reduce the risk of severe retinopathy in VLBW infants.

Authors:  Dorota Pawlik; Ryszard Lauterbach; Ewa Turyk
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Adjusted poor weight gain for birth weight and gestational age as a predictor of severe ROP in VLBW infants.

Authors:  O Aydemir; Y U Sarikabadayi; C Aydemir; Z O Tunay; L Tok; O Erdeve; S S Oguz; N Uras; U Dilmen
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Incidence and severity of retinopathy of prematurity in extremely premature infants.

Authors:  Gloria Isaza; Sourabh Arora
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.882

8.  A clinical prediction model to stratify retinopathy of prematurity risk using postnatal weight gain.

Authors:  Gil Binenbaum; Gui-shuang Ying; Graham E Quinn; Stephan Dreiseitl; Karen Karp; Robin S Roberts; Haresh Kirpalani
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Importance of early postnatal weight gain for normal retinal angiogenesis in very preterm infants: a multicenter study analyzing weight velocity deviations for the prediction of retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Carolyn Wu; Chatarina Löfqvist; Lois E H Smith; Deborah K VanderVeen; Ann Hellström
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08

10.  Predicting proliferative retinopathy in a Brazilian population of preterm infants with the screening algorithm WINROP.

Authors:  Anna-Lena Hård; Chatarina Löfqvist; Joao Borges Fortes Filho; Renato Soibelmann Procianoy; Lois Smith; Ann Hellström
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11
View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Retinopathy of prematurity: Past, present and future.

Authors:  Parag K Shah; Vishma Prabhu; Smita S Karandikar; Ratnesh Ranjan; Venkatapathy Narendran; Narendran Kalpana
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2016-02-08

2.  The role of serial measurements of serum insulin-like growth factor 1 levels in the development of retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Bayram Ali Dorum; Cansu Canbolat Yılmaz; Nilgün Köksal; Hilal Özkan; Meral Yıldız; Ahmet Tuncer Özmen
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2017-03-01

3.  Prediction of severe retinopathy of prematurity using the weight gain, insulin-like growth factor 1, and neonatal retinopathy of prematurity algorithm in a Japanese population of preterm infants.

Authors:  Kaori Ueda; Akiko Miki; Shunichiro Nakai; Suiho Yanagisawa; Koji Nomura; Makoto Nakamura
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Use of an online screening algorithm - Weight, Insulin-derived growth factor 1, Neonatal Retinopathy of Prematurity (WINROP) for predicting retinopathy of prematurity in Indian preterm babies.

Authors:  Smith Snehal Sute; Suksham Jain; Deepak Chawla; Subina Narang
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Low birth weight is a risk factor for severe retinopathy of prematurity depending on gestational age.

Authors:  Pia Lundgren; Anna Kistner; Eva M Andersson; Ingrid Hansen Pupp; Gerd Holmström; David Ley; Aimon Niklasson; Lois E H Smith; Carolyn Wu; Ann Hellström; Chatarina Löfqvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Low energy intake during the first 4 weeks of life increases the risk for severe retinopathy of prematurity in extremely preterm infants.

Authors:  Elisabeth Stoltz Sjöström; Pia Lundgren; Inger Öhlund; Gerd Holmström; Ann Hellström; Magnus Domellöf
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.747

7.  Cohort study of growth patterns by gestational age in preterm infants developing morbidity.

Authors:  S Klevebro; P Lundgren; U Hammar; L E Smith; M Bottai; M Domellöf; C Löfqvist; B Hallberg; A Hellström
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  WINROP algorithm for prediction of sight threatening retinopathy of prematurity: Initial experience in Indian preterm infants.

Authors:  Gaurav Sanghi; Anil Narang; Sunny Narula; Mangat R Dogra
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 9.  Retinopathy of prematurity: inflammation, choroidal degeneration, and novel promising therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  José Carlos Rivera; Mari Holm; Dordi Austeng; Tora Sund Morken; Tianwei Ellen Zhou; Alexandra Beaudry-Richard; Estefania Marin Sierra; Olaf Dammann; Sylvain Chemtob
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 8.322

10.  Assessment of WINROP algorithm as screening tool for preterm infants in Manitoba to detect retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Ebtihal Ali; Nasser Al-Shafouri; Abrar Hussain; R John Baier
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 2.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.