Literature DB >> 24068614

Detection and evaluation of immunofunction of patients with severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome.

Liping Sun1, Yanjie Hu, Aime Niyonsaba, Qiaoxia Tong, Li Lu, Huiyu Li, Shenghua Jie.   

Abstract

Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) is an emerging infectious disease caused by SFTS virus (SFTSV) with a high fatality rate. But the immunofunction was still unclear. The objective of our study was to assess the immunofunction in SFTS patients. Immunofunction test with flow cytometry which contains CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, B cells and NK cells would be used for detecting serum samples collected from 34 SFTS cases and 20 healthy donors. We found that CD3+ and CD4+ T lymphocytes were significantly diminished in SFTS compared to normal control. In contrast, the percentage of NK cells was elevated. Further analysis revealed that the number of CD3+ and CD4+ T lymphocytes showed that there was a more robust pattern of depression in acute phase and severe SFTS infection compared to the patients in recovery phase and mild SFTS infection. But NK cells were significantly increased in acute phase and severe SFTS. They reverted to the near normal levels in convalescent phase. Additionally, the levels of CD3+ and CD4+ T lymphocytes progressively decreased in death group when compared with the survival group, but the level of B cells was higher. The damages of immune system were obvious, and the immune dysfunction might be partly responsible for disease progression of patients with SFTSV infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24068614      PMCID: PMC7101760          DOI: 10.1007/s10238-013-0259-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1591-8890            Impact factor:   3.984


Introduction

Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) is an emerging infectious disease caused by severe fever with thrombocytopenia bunyavirus (SFTSV), which is identified recently in multiple provinces in China. SFTSV is infected mainly by tick stings, and it also can be infected by contacting with the blood and secretion of SFTS patients [1, 2]. SFTSV is a novel phlebovirus within bunyavirus family [3], which can damage cells and tissue widely [4]. SFTS is an acute illness with clinical presentations of abrupt fever, thrombocytopenia, leukocytopenia, gastrointestinal symptoms, neural disorders, proteinuria, hematuria and bleeding tendency [5-8]. The case fatality rate for this severe disease was 30 % [3]. However, the pathogenic mechanism in patients with SFTSV infection is still unclear. Viral interaction with the innate immune system played a core role in determining the outcomes of the infection [9]. Some authors had found that SFTS patients were at least partly immune-mediated, which might play an important role in determining the severity and clinical outcome [10]. Lymphocyte played an important role in the induction of cellular immunity in organism. Dysfunction of lymphocyte subsets caused immunofunction abnormality, which made disease deteriorate progressively and protractedly. Lymphocytes could stimulate the organism to produce immune response against viral antigens when organism was infected with SFTSV. It is clear that many viruses encode specific gene products that antagonize the immune response in recent years [11, 12]. Therefore, figuring out how SFTSV interacts with the host immune system is essential to understand the molecular mechanisms of SFTS. Until recently, immunofunction and lymphocyte subpopulation studies with respects to SFTSV infection are insufficient. We analyzed T-cell subgroups and their possible roles in SFTS disease.

Materials and methods

Patient demographics and clinical samples

The present study was a part of the study on pathogenetic mechanisms of SFTS disease involved 34 admitted SFTS patients (aged 30–78 years) from the Department of Infectious Diseases of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology between May 2012 and September 2012. The viral RNA of all SFTS samples was detected to confirm positively for SFTSV infection by using a certificated real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) kit [13]. Serum samples from 20 healthy volunteers (who neither suffer from any disease nor take medicine in recent weeks) were normal control, and we divided SFTS patients into different groups based on consistent clinical features. The serum samples of the acute phase of the patients were collected in an initial week, and after 2 weeks, they were in recovery phase. For mild and severe cases, the serum samples were collected around 7–12 days post the onset of illness according to the patients’ condition. Human samples which were involved in the study were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The written informed consent was signed. A series of blood samples from participators by peripheral venipuncture were drawn into ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) anticoagulation tube, and then they were immediately sent to the laboratory.

Flow cytometry

The peripheral blood samples were processed for an analysis of lymphocyte subsets by flow cytometry within 2 h. Lymphocyte subsets were identified by the following monoclonal antibodies: anti-CD45-PerCP, anti-CD3-FITC, anti-CD8-PE, anti-CD4-APC, anti-CD16/56-PE and anti-CD19-APC. Cell suspension was incubated in dark place at room temperature for 30 min. The red blood cells were removed by using 500 μl lysis buffer in dark place at room temperature for 10 min. Finally, cells were washed and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and got the results on a flow cytometer (FACS Calibur™, Becton Dickison Crop). Up to 5000–10000 total events were collected per sample. The lymphocyte population was selected by gating lymphocytes. The number of positive cells including the expression of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, B cells and NK cells was analyzed as a percentage of the cells in the lymphocyte gate.

Statistical analysis

The differences between the two groups were analyzed by the paired Student’s t test. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant, using two-sided comparisons (confidence level 95 %). Data were stated by mean ± S.D or median. Analyses were performed by using the GraphPad Prism 5 (Graph Pad Prism, La Jolla, CA, USA).

Results

Patients description and clinical laboratory parameters in SFTS patients

We recorded the clinical course and laboratory data of SFTS patients prospectively. Thirty-four SFTS patients were admitted from hilly or mountainous areas of Hubei and Henan province, and they described a history of field exposure within 2 weeks of the illness onset. The mean age was 55 years (range, 30–78 years), and 11(32.4 %) were male. All the patients suffered fever during the disease progression, and the mean days were 8 days (range, 5–14 days). The mean time of hospital stay was 9 days (range, 3–22 days). Three female patients who were 56–69 years old (8.82 %) died from severe SFTS owing to oral infection, lung infection with fungus and staphylococcus and so on in our research. However, some SFTS patients died of heart and respiratory failure during the initial several hours of hospitalization, so we did not get the samples. Among these patients, there were 12 patients (35.29 %) in acute phase, including 9 females and 3 males, with an average age of 57 years; 14 patients were severe, including 11 females and 3 males, with an average age of 58 years (Table 1). When taking into account the factor of age, we found that the patients in these two stages were elderly. We have confirmed that age is a significant predictor for multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and death [14].
Table 1

Basic characteristics of samples involved in this study

GroupNumberSexAgeDuration of feverHospital stayDeath
FMMedianRangeMedianRangeMedianRange
Control201823017–55
SFTS3423115530–7885–1493–223
Acute12935732–7853–73
Recovery16975329–66
Mild17895429–7275–1386–14
Severe141135842–7897–1595–223
Basic characteristics of samples involved in this study We also observed 12 sets of clinical laboratory parameters, including hematological and biochemical parameters (Table 2). All of the SFTS patients had thrombocytopenia and decreased WBC, NE %, LY % and ALB, but ALT, AST, LDH, PT, CK and CK-MB were elevated in acute phase and severe SFTS patients. Acute phase for SFTS patients indicated that patients were in the first week of the onset, and clinical features and laboratory parameters were abnormal. In comparison with SFTS patients in recovery phase, serum levels of WBC, PLT, AST and CK were significantly lower in acute phase, but the levels of NE, LY, ALT, ALB, CRP, BUN, LDH and PT did not show statistical significance. Severe SFTS cases were categorized by having at least one of the following symptoms such as respiratory, renal, hepatic, cardiovascular and central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction, even with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) tendency and shock. There were significant differences in serum levels of PLT, AST, CK and LDH between severe and mild cases (p<0.05). In death cases, only ALB was significant, but the difference might be due to the comparatively small study groups and big errors.
Table 2

Comparison of clinic parameters in different conditions of SFTS patients

ParameterAcute phaseRecovery phaseMild SFTSSevere SFTSDeathSurvival
WBC × 109/L1.94 (0.9–3.2)a 4.05 (1.2–10.8)3.86 (1.2–9.9)1.93 (0.9–15.6)8.56 (2.0–15.6)1.76 (0.9–13.3)
NE, %68.9 (4.5–93)68.3 (32.6–95.7)61.2 (32.6–91)70.4 (4.5–93)75.7 (65.1–88.7)57.9 (4.5–88.7)
LY, %27.6 (5.5–79.9)19.1 (3–63.1)30.2 (6.6–63.)25.9 (5.5–79.9)17.3 (5.5–26.2)32.3 (7.4–79.9)
PLT, × 109/L51.5 (17–62)b 69 (31–246)65 (31–246)c 44 (17–69)83 (53–176)67 (33–241)
ALT,U/L108 (24–241)70 (31–247)77 (7–187)81.5 (36–241)176 (83–253)67 (33–241)
AST,U/L243.5 (32–862)b 88 (24–412)117 (9–412)c 274 (64–862)264 (258–579)203 (27–862)
ALB,g/L31.3 (26–38.8)32.6 (23.5–37.8)32.7 (23.5–37.8)30.4 (21.4–37.3)23.8 (21.4–29.7)d 31.5 (26–37.3)
CRP,μmol/L80.8 (41.3–300.1)59.55 (33.4–89.3)49.8 (38.6–300.1)72.3 (33.4–87.5)46.8 (38.6–68.5)67 (51.9–102.8)
BUN,mmol/L5.1 (2.4–13.2)3.9 (2.1–7.2)4.0 (2.1–7.2)4.4 (2.4–13.2)3.4 (3.3–4.6)3.8 (2.4–8.5)
CK,U/L1,319 (149–4554)a 217 (28-1234)230 (25-1234)c 1209 (115-4554)1,598 (490–2001)689 (29–4554)
LDH,U/L1,107 (354–2100)553.5 (221–2370)540 (174–749)c 1016 (228–2370)1,376 (828–1596)1,016 (228–2370)
PT,s12.8 (11.6–14.3)13.1 (11.6–21.7)13.7 (11.6–21.7)12.7 (11.6–14.3)13.2 (13.2–14.1)12.7 (1.6–14.3)

Data are median (interquartile range); WBC white blood cell count, NE neutrophil, LY lymphocyte, PLT platelet count, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, ALB albumin, CR creatinine, BUN blood urea nitrogen, CK creatine kinase, PT prothrombin time

a p<0.01, b  p<0.05 compared with recovery phase; c  p<0.05 compared with severe SFTS; d  P<0.05 compared with survival

Comparison of clinic parameters in different conditions of SFTS patients Data are median (interquartile range); WBC white blood cell count, NE neutrophil, LY lymphocyte, PLT platelet count, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, ALB albumin, CR creatinine, BUN blood urea nitrogen, CK creatine kinase, PT prothrombin time a p<0.01, b  p<0.05 compared with recovery phase; c  p<0.05 compared with severe SFTS; d  P<0.05 compared with survival

Lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood

Thirty-four samples from SFTS patients and 20 healthy donors were subjected to flow cytometry for immunofunction test. The values of T-lymphocyte subpopulation, B cells and NK cells are shown in Fig. 1. The CD3+ and CD4+ T lymphocytes were decreased significantly in SFTS with 60.66 ± 11.19 %(p < 0.01) and 33.15 ± 7.73 %(p < 0.01), respectively, but SFTS patients had a significantly higher percentage of NK cells in peripheral blood (21.33 ± 9.74 %, p < 0.05) compared to normal control. The proportions of CD8+ T cells, B cells and CD4 +/CD8+ T cells were also diminished or elevated in SFTS patients. However, there were no obvious statistically significances between SFTS and normal control regarding the values of CD8+ T cells, B cells and CD4 +/CD8+ T cells (p > 0.05).
Fig. 1

Comparison of percentage of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte, B cell and NK cell, as determined by flow cytometry. a The percentage of lymphocytes in 34 SFTS patients and 20 healthy donors. b The percentage of lymphocytes were compared between 12 acute cases and 16 convalescent cases. c The percentage of lymphocytes were compared between 14 severe cases and 17 mild cases. d The percentage of lymphocytes were in 3 death cases vs 11 survival cases. Data were expressed as means with SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01

Comparison of percentage of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte, B cell and NK cell, as determined by flow cytometry. a The percentage of lymphocytes in 34 SFTS patients and 20 healthy donors. b The percentage of lymphocytes were compared between 12 acute cases and 16 convalescent cases. c The percentage of lymphocytes were compared between 14 severe cases and 17 mild cases. d The percentage of lymphocytes were in 3 death cases vs 11 survival cases. Data were expressed as means with SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 According to the clinical manifestation and results of auxiliary examination, we divided the SFTS into different groups. Levels including acute and convalescent cases, mild and severe SFTS, death and survival SFTSV infection were compared. The levels of CD3+ T lymphocytes were 57.02 ± 7.52 % and 64.62 ± 8.84 % in patients with acute and convalescent cases, 56.3 ± 8.72 % and 61.9 ± 15.4 % in patients with mild and severe SFTSV infection, 45.17 ± 8.61 % and 60.97 ± 6.86 % in patients with death and survival SFTS, respectively, and the differences were significant (p < 0.05). CD4+ T-lymphocytes’ levels were 27.64 ± 4.00 % and 34.21 ± 4.91 % in patients with acute and convalescent cases, 29.88 ± 5.51 % and 33.76 ± 10.45 % in patients with mild and severe SFTSV infection, 23.04 ± 2.96 % and 32.43 ± 6.11 % in patients with death and survival SFTS, respectively, and the differences were significant (p < 0.05). The proportion of NK cells was significantly increased in patients with acute phase and severe SFTS compared to convalescent cases and mild SFTS (24.03 ± 9.77 % vs 16.76 ± 8.11 and 23.85 ± 8.23 % vs 17.42 ± 8.64 %). However, within severe SFTS patients, the proportion of B cells was significantly diminished in survival cases compared to death cases(13.3 ± 4.81 % vs 20.16 ± 3.39 %). Although levels of CD8+ T cells and CD4+/CD8+ T cells were lower in SFTS group, acute phase and severe SFTSV infection than those in control group, convalescent phase and mild SFTSV infection, the differences were not significant (p > 0.05). In order to acquire overall comprehension of immunofunction, we also statistically compared the variations of lymphocyte levels in the progression of the disease. The 12 paired samples were chosen from the acute to convalescent phase among 34 SFTS patients, as well as 14 paired samples from mild to severe SFTSV infection. The analysis showed that the expression levels of CD3+ and CD4+ in the convalescent phase increased to the near normal levels (Fig. 2a). But the level of NK cells in the convalescent phase decreased compared to that in the acute phase. In contrast, when the condition of SFTS patients progressed from mildness to severity, the contents of CD3+ and CD4+ diminished gradually. And an impressive level elevation of NK cell was presented in severe SFTS patients (Fig. 2b). These dynamic analyses indicated that the immunofunction that back to physiological range was associated with the recovery and the mild state of SFTS disease.
Fig. 2

Comparison of CD3+, CD4+ and NK cell in paired acute phase and convalescent phase, and in paired mild and severe SFTSV infection. a The percentage of CD3+, CD4+ and NK cell were compared in the paired samples from acute and convalescent phase. b The percentage of CD3+, CD4+ and NK cell were compared in the paired samples from mild and severe SFTS infection. Each dot shows the level in an individual. Each line connects a pair of samples chosen from the same case. *p<0.05, **p<0.01

Comparison of CD3+, CD4+ and NK cell in paired acute phase and convalescent phase, and in paired mild and severe SFTSV infection. a The percentage of CD3+, CD4+ and NK cell were compared in the paired samples from acute and convalescent phase. b The percentage of CD3+, CD4+ and NK cell were compared in the paired samples from mild and severe SFTS infection. Each dot shows the level in an individual. Each line connects a pair of samples chosen from the same case. *p<0.05, **p<0.01

Discussion

The pathogenesis of SFTS is not distinct at present. We described the clinical symptoms and laboratory parameters during the complete course of SFTS disease. The characteristics were more obvious for patients in acute phase and severe SFTS than that in recovery phase and mild SFTS. Those physiological balance of laboratory parameters was substantially altered in acute phase and returned to physiological ranges during the recovery phase. It had been shown that innate immune responses determined the pathogenesis of SFTS, as well as high level of viral replication [10]. The amount of lymphocyte and its subsets was stable relatively in peripheral blood and tissue. And lymphocyte produced moderate immune response, which could eliminate foreign antigen without injuring intracorporal organism. But the balance was broken when SFTSV invaded and the amount of lymphocytic subpopulations changed. Our study showed that the expression level of lymphocyte subsets was abnormal in the peripheral blood of SFTS, especially in acute phase and severe SFTS patients. In our prospective study, the most striking findings were the significant elevation of NK cell and the distinct depression of CD3+ and CD4+ in peripheral blood of patients with SFTSV infection. The leukocyte count in SFTS was less than 4 × 109/L, and the average level was 2.86 ± 1.56 × 109/L. While the proportion of lymphocytes was decreased in acute and severe SFTS patients, together with these data, we found that activated T cells played a crucial role in the pathophysiology of SFTS since the main proportions of lymphocytes in peripheral blood were changed. The total number of T cells in SFTS patients decreased significantly and the decline in the number of CD3+ T lymphocytes prompted that the number of active cells was insufficient to participate in cellular immune response, and then, the cellular immune function was low in SFTS patients. The expression of CD4+ on T cells was obviously reduced in SFTS, which made the function of immune globulin downgrade. At the same time, we also found that the percentage of NK cells was significantly high. It was well known that NK cells were classified as lymphocytes on the basis of their morphology, expression of lymphoid markers and common origin. NK cells had been shown in humans and mice to participate in the early control against virus infection [15]. NK cells could kill virally infected or transformed cells [16]. Therefore, NK cells were highly important for the pathogenesis of SFTS disease progression. It was revealed in our study that the variation of lymphocyte subpopulation was associated with the phase of the disease and the patient’s condition. In acute phase, the leukocyte count was less than 4 × 109/L, and it gradually returned to normal level in convalescence phase, while the leukocyte count was 2-4 × 109/L in mild SFTS patients, and it was less than 2 × 109/L in severe SFTSV infection. The percentages of CD3+ and CD4+ were significantly lower in the acute phase and severe SFTSV infection than those in recovery phase and mild SFTSV infection. The balance of immunocytes was broken and lymphocytopenia took place due to the effects of multiple stimuli. Li et al. [17] found that CD4+ T lymphocytes had a sharp decline in the research of severe acute respiratory syndromes (ARDS), which resulted in the damage of cellular immune function. CD4+ T lymphocytes could induce the virus specificity cytotoxic T cell forming specific polyclone immunity and assist B cell to produce neutralizing antibody, which made key roles in incubation period and acute phase when virus infected. We presumed that the reasons for the reduction of CD3+ and CD4+ T cells in acute and severe SFTS were as follows: firstly, T lymphocytes which struggled with SFTSV avoided fierce injuries to the organism; secondly, complicated immune made T lymphocytes damage and weakened the ability of immune response in the urgent condition of disease [18]. In contrast to T cells, we found that the count of NK cells was showed to increase, and the differences were statistically significant in acute and severe cases. NK cells, as components of innate immune defense, could directly induce the death of virus-infected cells in the absence of specific immunization, such as cellular immune. NK cells possessed immunoregulatory functions since they secreted cytokines such as IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-10 and G-CSF. These inflammatory cytokines and chemokines played roles in the pathogenesis of virus infection, and the levels of them were related to the severity of the illness [19, 20]. Simultaneously, NK cells might exacerbate the disease by releasing multiple inflammatory cytokines and chemokines or damaging the affected tissues through direct cytotoxicity [21]. It had been found that the level of IFN-γ increased in fatal SFTS cases[20], and IFN-γ could induce apoptosis of lymphocytes[22]. This might be one of the possible mechanisms of lymphocytopenia in SFTS patients due to direct and indirect attack of SFTSV. Therefore, we inferred that NK cells educed main roles against SFTSV infection when cellular immune function was weakened obviously. However, the indicators would rise again obviously during the recovery phase, which prompted that it was temporary for the cell immunosuppression resulting from SFTSV infection. The expression of CD3+ and CD4+ T cells in three death cases of whom were older in severe SFTS diminished sharply. Moreover, as the SFTS disease developed, the level of T leukocyte count was progressively diminished, and there was a more significant decline in the expression of CD3+ and CD4+ T cells. Th1 was the positive cell in CD4+ T lymphocytes, and SFTSV triggered the immune system mechanisms mainly by stimulating the Th1 cells to produce immune responses against the viruses [21]. Deng et al .[21] had demonstrated that SFTSV activated mainly Th1 immune response against viral invasion. The decline of CD4+ T lymphocytes caused the suppression of immunofunction, which might aggravate the patient’s condition. At the same time, we found that the percentage of B cells in death cases was significantly higher than that in the survival cases. It might indicate that humoral immunity could be activated when patient’s condition was extremely serious, and then, humoral immunity produced antibody to develop the neutralization and enhance the phagocytosis. The immunofunction was extremely low in severe SFTS that increased the risk of secondary infection. However, the difference in the lymphocyte subgroups might not be helpful to judge the prognosis of death and survival owing to higher variations and lower case numbers. In conclusion, the CD3+ and CD4+ T lymphocytes were significantly lower in SFTS than those in normal control, and the damages of cellular immune system were obvious in the disease progression of patients with SFTSV infection. NK cells were significantly higher and played important roles in killing virally infected cells. Furthermore, the immunofunction was damaged seriously in the severe SFTS patients and acute phase. Therefore, immunofunction detection might be an indicator to aid physicians in evaluating the disease severity of SFTS patients.
  21 in total

1.  Hemorrhagic fever caused by a novel Bunyavirus in China: pathogenesis and correlates of fatal outcome.

Authors:  Yong-Zhen Zhang; Yong-Wen He; Yong-An Dai; Yanwen Xiong; Han Zheng; Dun-Jin Zhou; Juan Li; Qiangzheng Sun; Xue-Lian Luo; Yu-Li Cheng; Xin-Cheng Qin; Jun-Hua Tian; Xiao-Ping Chen; Bin Yu; Dong Jin; Wen-Ping Guo; Wei Li; Wen Wang; Jin-Song Peng; Guo-Bin Zhang; Shaomin Zhang; Xiao-Min Chen; Yan Wang; Ming-Hui Li; Zhenjun Li; Shan Lu; Changyun Ye; Menno D de Jong; Jianguo Xu
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 2.  Role of chemokines in the biology of natural killer cells.

Authors:  Azzam A Maghazachi
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  Mouse hepatitis coronavirus A59 nucleocapsid protein is a type I interferon antagonist.

Authors:  Ye Ye; Kevin Hauns; Jeffrey O Langland; Bertram L Jacobs; Brenda G Hogue
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  The V proteins of paramyxoviruses bind the IFN-inducible RNA helicase, mda-5, and inhibit its activation of the IFN-beta promoter.

Authors:  J Andrejeva; K S Childs; D F Young; T S Carlos; N Stock; S Goodbourn; R E Randall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A family cluster of infections by a newly recognized bunyavirus in eastern China, 2007: further evidence of person-to-person transmission.

Authors:  Chang-jun Bao; Xi-ling Guo; Xian Qi; Jian-li Hu; Ming-hao Zhou; Jay K Varma; Lun-biao Cui; Hai-tao Yang; Yong-jun Jiao; John D Klena; Lu-xun Li; Wen-yuan Tao; Xian Li; Yin Chen; Zheng Zhu; Ke Xu; Ai-hua Shen; Tao Wu; Hai-yan Peng; Zhi-feng Li; Jun Shan; Zhi-yang Shi; Hua Wang
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Early diagnosis of novel SFTS bunyavirus infection by quantitative real-time RT-PCR assay.

Authors:  Yulan Sun; Mifang Liang; Jing Qu; Cong Jin; Quanfu Zhang; Jiandong Li; Xiaolin Jiang; Qin Wang; Jing Lu; Wen Gu; Shuo Zhang; Chuan Li; Xianjun Wang; Faxian Zhan; Wenqing Yao; Zhenqiang Bi; Shiwen Wang; Dexin Li
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 3.168

7.  Antigen-induced cell death of T effector cells in vitro proceeds via the Fas pathway, requires endogenous interferon-gamma and is independent of perforin and granzymes.

Authors:  Vera Sobek; Sandra Balkow; Heinrich Körner; Markus M Simon
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 8.  Chemokines activate natural killer cells through heterotrimeric G-proteins: implications for the treatment of AIDS and cancer.

Authors:  A A Maghazachi; A Al-Aoukaty
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Nosocomial transmission of human granulocytic anaplasmosis in China.

Authors:  Lijuan Zhang; Yan Liu; Daxin Ni; Qun Li; Yanlin Yu; Xue-jie Yu; Kanglin Wan; Dexin Li; Guodong Liang; Xiugao Jiang; Huaiqi Jing; Jing Run; Mingchun Luan; Xiuping Fu; Jingshan Zhang; Weizhong Yang; Yu Wang; J Stephen Dumler; Zijian Feng; Jun Ren; Jianguo Xu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever.

Authors:  Onder Ergönül
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 25.071

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  The Emergence of Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Virus.

Authors:  Jesus A Silvas; Patricia V Aguilar
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Depletion but Activation of CD56dimCD16+ NK Cells in Acute Infection with Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Virus.

Authors:  Mengmeng Li; Yan Xiong; Mingyue Li; Wenjing Zhang; Jia Liu; Yanfang Zhang; Shue Xiong; Congcong Zou; Boyun Liang; Mengji Lu; Dongliang Yang; Cheng Peng; Xin Zheng
Journal:  Virol Sin       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.327

Review 3.  The Endless Wars: Severe Fever With Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Virus, Host Immune and Genetic Factors.

Authors:  Min Wang; Weilong Tan; Jun Li; Liqun Fang; Ming Yue
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.073

4.  Clinical laboratory parameters and fatality of Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yao Wang; Zexuan Song; Xuemin Wei; Haowen Yuan; Xiaoying Xu; Hao Liang; Hongling Wen
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2022-06-17

5.  Early-Warning Immune Predictors for Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Severe Patients With Severe Fever With Thrombocytopenia Syndrome.

Authors:  Lifen Hu; Qinxiang Kong; Chengcheng Yue; Xihai Xu; Lingling Xia; Tingting Bian; Yanyan Liu; Hui Zhang; Xuejiao Ma; Huafa Yin; Qiulin Sun; Yufeng Gao; Ying Ye; Jiabin Li
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Concurrent measurement of dynamic changes in viral load, serum enzymes, T cell subsets, and cytokines in patients with severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome.

Authors:  Jun Li; Yaping Han; Yiping Xing; Shuang Li; Lianhua Kong; Yongxiang Zhang; Lili Zhang; Ning Liu; Qian Wang; Shixia Wang; Shan Lu; Zuhu Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Two autopsy cases of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) in Japan: a pathognomonic histological feature and unique complication of SFTS.

Authors:  Tsubasa Hiraki; Makoto Yoshimitsu; Tadaki Suzuki; Yuko Goto; Michiyo Higashi; Seiya Yokoyama; Tomohisa Tabuchi; Takahiro Futatsuki; Kentaro Nakamura; Hideki Hasegawa; Masayuki Saijo; Yasuyuki Kakihana; Naomichi Arima; Suguru Yonezawa
Journal:  Pathol Int       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 2.534

8.  Unusual presentation of a severely ill patient having severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome: a case report.

Authors:  Masahiko Kaneko; Masaki Maruta; Hisaharu Shikata; Kengo Asou; Hiroto Shinomiya; Tadaki Suzuki; Hideki Hasegawa; Masayuki Shimojima; Masayuki Saijo
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2017-02-03

9.  Hyperferritinemia as a Diagnostic Marker for Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome.

Authors:  Uh Jin Kim; Tae Hoon Oh; Bansuk Kim; Seong Eun Kim; Seung-Ji Kang; Kyung-Hwa Park; Sook-In Jung; Hee-Chang Jang
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.434

10.  Risk factors associated with fatality of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuxin Chen; Bei Jia; Yong Liu; Rui Huang; Junhao Chen; Chao Wu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.