Literature DB >> 24068176

The quest for stiff, strong and tough hybrid materials: an exhaustive exploration.

F Barthelat1, M Mirkhalaf.   

Abstract

How to arrange soft materials with strong but brittle reinforcements to achieve attractive combinations of stiffness, strength and toughness is an ongoing and fascinating question in engineering and biological materials science. Recent advances in topology optimization and bioinspiration have brought interesting answers to this question, but they provide only small windows into the vast design space associated with this problem. Here, we take a more global approach in which we assess the mechanical performance of thousands of possible microstructures. This exhaustive exploration gives a global picture of structure-property relationships and guarantees that global optima can be found. Landscapes of optimum solutions for different combinations of desired properties can also be created, revealing the robustness of each of the solutions. Interestingly, while some of the major hybrid designs used in engineering are absent from the set of solutions, the microstructures emerging from this process are reminiscent of materials, such as bone, nacre or spider silk.

Keywords:  bioinspired composites; biological materials; bone; hybrid materials; nacre; optimization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24068176      PMCID: PMC3808548          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  10 in total

1.  Multifunctional composites: optimizing microstructures for simultaneous transport of heat and electricity.

Authors:  S Torquato; S Hyun; A Donev
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2002-12-09       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  The stomatopod dactyl club: a formidable damage-tolerant biological hammer.

Authors:  James C Weaver; Garrett W Milliron; Ali Miserez; Kenneth Evans-Lutterodt; Steven Herrera; Isaias Gallana; William J Mershon; Brook Swanson; Pablo Zavattieri; Elaine DiMasi; David Kisailus
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  On optimal hierarchy of load-bearing biological materials.

Authors:  Zuoqi Zhang; Yong-Wei Zhang; Huajian Gao
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  On the mechanical properties of hierarchically structured biological materials.

Authors:  Sabine Bechtle; Siang Fung Ang; Gerold A Schneider
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  Biomimetics for next generation materials.

Authors:  Francois Barthelat
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Cohesive behavior of soft biological adhesives: experiments and modeling.

Authors:  A Khayer Dastjerdi; M Pagano; M T Kaartinen; M D McKee; F Barthelat
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 7.  Understanding the mechanical behaviour of human enamel from its structural and compositional characteristics.

Authors:  Li Hong He; Michael V Swain
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2007-05-24

8.  Failure mode transition in nacre and bone-like materials.

Authors:  Reza Rabiei; Sacheen Bekah; Francois Barthelat
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  The conflicts between strength and toughness.

Authors:  Robert O Ritchie
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 43.841

10.  Structural hierarchies define toughness and defect-tolerance despite simple and mechanically inferior brittle building blocks.

Authors:  Dipanjan Sen; Markus J Buehler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Material witness: Making space for shape.

Authors:  Philip Ball
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 43.841

2.  Turning nature's inspiration into a production line.

Authors:  Philip Hunter
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Interfibril hydrogen bonding improves the strain-rate response of natural armour.

Authors:  D Arola; S Ghods; C Son; S Murcia; E A Ossa
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Interphase tuning for stronger and tougher composites.

Authors:  Konstantin Livanov; Lin Yang; Asaf Nissenbaum; H Daniel Wagner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Calcite fibre formation in modern brachiopod shells.

Authors:  Maria Simonet Roda; Erika Griesshaber; Andreas Ziegler; Ulrich Rupp; Xiaofei Yin; Daniela Henkel; Vreni Häussermann; Jürgen Laudien; Uwe Brand; Anton Eisenhauer; Antonio G Checa; Wolfgang W Schmahl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Tough metal-ceramic composites with multifunctional nacre-like architecture.

Authors:  Erik Poloni; Florian Bouville; Christopher H Dreimol; Tobias P Niebel; Thomas Weber; Andrea R Biedermann; Ann M Hirt; André R Studart
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Using simulation to accelerate autonomous experimentation: A case study using mechanics.

Authors:  Aldair E Gongora; Kelsey L Snapp; Emily Whiting; Patrick Riley; Kristofer G Reyes; Elise F Morgan; Keith A Brown
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-03-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.