Literature DB >> 24067948

Mobile applications in dermatology.

Ann Chang Brewer1, Dawnielle C Endly, Jill Henley, Mahsa Amir, Blake P Sampson, Jacqueline F Moreau, Robert P Dellavalle.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: With advancements in mobile technology, cellular phone-based mobile applications (apps) may be used in the practice and delivery of dermatologic care.
OBJECTIVE: To identify and categorize the variety of current mobile apps available in dermatology for patients and providers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Dermatology-related search terms were queried in the online app stores of the most commonly used mobile platforms developed by Apple, Android, Blackberry, Nokia, and Windows. Applications were assigned to categories based on description. Popularity, price, and reviews were recorded and target audiences were determined through websites offering online mobile apps. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Number, type, and price of mobile apps in dermatology.
RESULTS: A total of 229 dermatology-related apps were identified in the following categories: general dermatology reference (61 [26.6%]), self-surveillance/diagnosis (41 [17.9%]), disease guide (39 [17.0%]), educational aid (20 [8.7%]), sunscreen/UV recommendation (19 [8.3%]), calculator (12 [5.2%]), teledermatology (8 [3.5%]), conference (6 [2.6%]), journal (6 [2.6%]), photograph storage/sharing (5 [2.2%]), dermoscopy (2 [0.9%]), pathology (2 [0.9%]), and other (8 [3.5%]). The most reviewed apps included Ultraviolet ~ UV Index (355 reviews), VisualDx (306), SPF (128), iSore (61), and SpotMole (50). There were 209 unique apps, with 17 apps existing on more than 1 operating system. More than half of the apps were offered free of charge (117 [51.1%]). Paid apps (112 [48.9%]) ranged from $0.99 to $139.99 (median, $2.99). Target audiences included patient (117 [51.1%]), health care provider (94 [41.0%]), and both (18 [7.9%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The widespread variety and popularity of mobile apps demonstrate a great potential to expand the practice and delivery of dermatologic care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24067948     DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.5517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Dermatol        ISSN: 2168-6068            Impact factor:   10.282


  20 in total

1.  Computer Applications in Health Science Education.

Authors:  Juan A Juanes; Pablo Ruisoto
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Mobile health technology and home hospice care: promise and pitfalls.

Authors:  Veerawat Phongtankuel; Ronald D Adelman; M C Reid
Journal:  Prog Palliat Care       Date:  2018-04-26

3.  Impact of a smartphone application on skin self-examination rates in patients who are new to total body photography: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Andrew J Marek; Emily Y Chu; Michael E Ming; Zeeshan A Khan; Carrie L Kovarik
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 4.  The digital age of melanoma management: detection and diagnostics.

Authors:  Alexander L Fogel; Kavita Sarin
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2015-11-26

5.  Assessment of smartphone applications for total body digital photography-guided skin exams by patients.

Authors:  Andrew J Marek; Emily Y Chu; Michael E Ming; Carrie L Kovarik
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 11.527

6.  Detection of Malignant Melanoma Using Artificial Intelligence: An Observational Study of Diagnostic Accuracy.

Authors:  Michael Phillips; Jack Greenhalgh; Helen Marsden; Ioulios Palamaras
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2019-12-31

7.  mHealth in Urology: A Review of Experts' Involvement in App Development.

Authors:  Nuno Pereira-Azevedo; Eduardo Carrasquinho; Eduardo Cardoso de Oliveira; Vitor Cavadas; Luís Osório; Avelino Fraga; Miguel Castelo-Branco; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Development of a Culturally Appropriate Bilingual Electronic App About Hepatitis B for Indigenous Australians: Towards Shared Understandings.

Authors:  Jane Davies; Sarah Bukulatjpi; Suresh Sharma; Luci Caldwell; Vanessa Johnston; Joshua Saul Davis
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2015-06-10

9.  Valuable features in mobile health apps for patients and consumers: content analysis of apps and user ratings.

Authors:  Martin F Mendiola; Miriam Kalnicki; Sarah Lindenauer
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 10.  Smartphone use in neurosurgery? APP-solutely!

Authors:  Michael Zaki; Doniel Drazin
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-07-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.