OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the exposure-response relationship of hand-arm vibration exposure to neurological symptoms (numbness) of the hand in a cohort of vibration-exposed workers. METHODS: The baseline cohort comprised 241 office and manual workers with and without exposure to hand-arm vibration. Numbness (the symptom or event) in the hand was assessed for all subjects at baseline and follow-ups after 5, 10, and 16 years. The workers were stratified into quartiles with no exposure in the first quartile and increasing intensity of exposure in quartiles 2-4 (groups 1-3). Data analysis was performed using survival analysis (time to event). Information on cumulative exposure and years of exposure to event was collected via questionnaires. Measurements were performed in accordance with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 5349-1. RESULTS: The hazard ratio (HR) of risk of event (numbness) differed statistically significantly between the non-exposed group (group 0) and the two higher exposure groups (groups 2 and 3). There was also a significant ratio difference between the lowest exposure group (group 1) and the two higher groups. The ratio for group 1 was 1.77 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.96-3.26] compared with 3.78 (95% CI 2.15-6.62) and 5.31 (95% CI 3.06-9.20) for groups 2 and 3, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results suggest a dose-response relationship between vibration exposure and numbness of the hands. This underlines the importance of keeping vibration levels low to prevent neurological injury to the hands.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the exposure-response relationship of hand-arm vibration exposure to neurological symptoms (numbness) of the hand in a cohort of vibration-exposed workers. METHODS: The baseline cohort comprised 241 office and manual workers with and without exposure to hand-arm vibration. Numbness (the symptom or event) in the hand was assessed for all subjects at baseline and follow-ups after 5, 10, and 16 years. The workers were stratified into quartiles with no exposure in the first quartile and increasing intensity of exposure in quartiles 2-4 (groups 1-3). Data analysis was performed using survival analysis (time to event). Information on cumulative exposure and years of exposure to event was collected via questionnaires. Measurements were performed in accordance with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 5349-1. RESULTS: The hazard ratio (HR) of risk of event (numbness) differed statistically significantly between the non-exposed group (group 0) and the two higher exposure groups (groups 2 and 3). There was also a significant ratio difference between the lowest exposure group (group 1) and the two higher groups. The ratio for group 1 was 1.77 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.96-3.26] compared with 3.78 (95% CI 2.15-6.62) and 5.31 (95% CI 3.06-9.20) for groups 2 and 3, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results suggest a dose-response relationship between vibration exposure and numbness of the hands. This underlines the importance of keeping vibration levels low to prevent neurological injury to the hands.
Authors: Rita Bast-Pettersen; Bente Ulvestad; Karl Færden; Thomas Aleksander C Clemm; Raymond Olsen; Dag Gunnar Ellingsen; Karl-Christian Nordby Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2016-10-28 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Eva Tekavec; Lotta Löfqvist; Anna Larsson; Karin Fisk; Jakob Riddar; Tohr Nilsson; Catarina Nordander Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 2.646
Authors: Maria Edlund; Lage Burström; Mats Hagberg; Ronnie Lundström; Tohr Nilsson; Helena Sandén; Gunilla Wastensson Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2014-07-05 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: D Carlsson; J Wahlström; L Burström; M Hagberg; R Lundström; H Pettersson; T Nilsson Journal: Occup Med (Lond) Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 1.611
Authors: Helena Fadl; Maryam Saeedi; Scott Montgomery; Anders Magnuson; Erik Schwarcz; Kerstin Berntorp; Verena Sengpiel; Elisabeth Storck-Lindholm; Helena Strevens; Anna-Karin Wikström; Sophia Brismar-Wendel; Martina Persson; Stefan Jansson; Fredrik Ahlsson; Carina Ursing; Linda Ryen; Kerstin Petersson; Ulla-Britt Wennerholm; Karin Hildén; David Simmons Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 3.007