Literature DB >> 24067855

Preparing for subsequent entry biologics in dermatology and rheumatology in Canada.

Kim Papp, Marc Bourcier, Vincent Ho, Karen Burke, Boulos Haraoui.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patents on several biologics will expire in Canada in the coming years. As they expire, applications to market subsequent entry biologics (SEBs) may be filed in Canada.
OBJECTIVE: To provide an understanding of the regulatory pathway and types of trials used for SEB authorization in Canada.
METHODS: Health Canada's draft guidance on SEBs was reviewed in regards to key issues and challenges in the development and authorization of SEBs.
RESULTS: Health Canada states that SEBs are not "generic biologics" and their authorization is not a declaration of pharmaceutical or therapeutic equivalence to the originator. The agency recommends that physicians make well-informed decisions regarding therapeutic interchange.
CONCLUSIONS: Decisions on how to determine the place of SEBs in clinical practice for biologic-naive patients and those already receiving biologics should be made on a case-by-case basis, considering the patient's needs, the characteristics of the biologic required, and the clinical development programs of the applicable SEB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24067855     DOI: 10.2310/7750.2013.13006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cutan Med Surg        ISSN: 1203-4754            Impact factor:   2.092


  1 in total

1.  Attitudes towards subsequent entry biologics/biosimilars: A survey of Canadian rheumatologists.

Authors:  David Grabowski; Bradley Henderson; Dennis Lam; Edward C Keystone; Carter Thorne; Shahin Jamal; Janet Pope; Boulos Haraoui; Daming Lin; Leigh Revers
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.980

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.