Literature DB >> 24067312

Factors influencing participation in breast cancer screening.

Lynne Edgar1, Marie Glackin, Caroline Hughes, Katherine Mary Ann Rogers.   

Abstract

Despite the efficacy of mammography and the widespread promotion of screening programmes, a significant number of eligible women still do not attend for regular breast screening. An integrative review methodology was considered the most appropriate means to critically analyse the available literature pertaining to factors which influence participation in breast cancer screening. From the extensive literature search, 12 selected core research papers met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated in the literature review. Four themes emerged from the literature which impact on participation in mammography screening: psychological and practical issues, ethnicity issues, influence of socioeconomic status and issues related to screening programmes. The recent Independent Review Panel on Breast Cancer Screening endorsed the importance of access to information which clearly communicates the harms and benefits of breast screening to enable women to make informed decisions about their health. The recommendations from the panel and others have been included in this review.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24067312     DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2013.22.17.1021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nurs        ISSN: 0966-0461


  9 in total

1.  Breast cancer screening practices among first-generation immigrant muslim women.

Authors:  Memoona Hasnain; Usha Menon; Carol Estwing Ferrans; Laura Szalacha
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Mammography Decision Aid Reduces Decisional Conflict for Women in Their Forties Considering Screening.

Authors:  Karen B Eden; Paula Scariati; Krystal Klein; Lindsey Watson; Mark Remiker; Michelle Hribar; Vanessa Forro; LeAnn Michaels; Heidi D Nelson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Influencing Cancer Screening Participation Rates-Providing a Combined Cancer Screening Program (a 'One Stop' Shop) Could Be a Potential Answer.

Authors:  Amanda Bobridge; Kay Price; Tiffany K Gill; Anne W Taylor
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Does mammogram attendance influence participation in cervical and colorectal cancer screening? A prospective study among 1856 French women.

Authors:  Aurélie Bertaut; Julien Coudert; Leila Bengrine; Vincent Dancourt; Christine Binquet; Serge Douvier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Experiences and perceptions about undergoing mammographic screening: a qualitative study involving women from a county in Sweden.

Authors:  Maria Norfjord Van Zyl; Sharareh Akhavan; Per Tillgren; Margareta Asp
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2018-12

6.  Fears and barriers: problems in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment in Pakistan.

Authors:  Sidra Saeed; Muhammad Asim; Malik Muhammad Sohail
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Reasons for intending to accept or decline kidney cancer screening: thematic analysis of free text from an online survey.

Authors:  Charlotte Freer-Smith; Laragh Harvey-Kelly; Katie Mills; Hannah Harrison; Sabrina H Rossi; Simon J Griffin; Grant D Stewart; Juliet A Usher-Smith
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Evaluation of a mobile mammography unit: concepts and randomized cluster trial protocol of a population health intervention research to reduce breast cancer screening inequalities.

Authors:  Elodie Guillaume; Quentin Rollet; Ludivine Launay; Séverine Beuriot; Olivier Dejardin; Annick Notari; Elodie Crevel; Ahmed Benhammouda; Laurent Verzaux; Marie-Christine Quertier; Guy Launoy
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 2.728

9.  Assessing and Explaining Geographic Variations in Mammography Screening Participation and Breast Cancer Incidence.

Authors:  Jonas Czwikla; Iris Urbschat; Joachim Kieschke; Frank Schüssler; Ingo Langner; Falk Hoffmann
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.