Literature DB >> 24066899

Implantation of in vitro tissue engineered muscle repair constructs and bladder acellular matrices partially restore in vivo skeletal muscle function in a rat model of volumetric muscle loss injury.

Benjamin T Corona1, Catherine L Ward, Hannah B Baker, Thomas J Walters, George J Christ.   

Abstract

The frank loss of a large volume of skeletal muscle (i.e., volumetric muscle loss [VML]) can lead to functional debilitation and presents a significant problem to civilian and military medicine. Current clinical treatment for VML involves the use of free muscle flaps and physical rehabilitation; however, neither are effective in promoting regeneration of skeletal muscle to replace the tissue that was lost. Toward this end, skeletal muscle tissue engineering therapies have recently shown great promise in offering an unprecedented treatment option for VML. In the current study, we further extend our recent progress (Machingal et al., 2011, Tissue Eng; Corona et al., 2012, Tissue Eng) in the development of tissue engineered muscle repair (TEMR) constructs (i.e., muscle-derived cells [MDCs] seeded on a bladder acellular matrix (BAM) preconditioned with uniaxial mechanical strain) for the treatment of VML. TEMR constructs were implanted into a VML defect in a tibialis anterior (TA) muscle of Lewis rats and observed up to 12 weeks postinjury. The salient findings of the study were (1) TEMR constructs exhibited a highly variable capacity to restore in vivo function of injured TA muscles, wherein TEMR-positive responders (n=6) promoted an ≈61% improvement, but negative responders (n=7) resulted in no improvement compared to nonrepaired controls, (2) TEMR-positive and -negative responders exhibited differential immune responses that may underlie these variant responses, (3) BAM scaffolds (n=7) without cells promoted an ≈26% functional improvement compared to uninjured muscles, (4) TEMR-positive responders promoted muscle fiber regeneration within the initial defect area, while BAM scaffolds did so only sparingly. These findings indicate that TEMR constructs can improve the in vivo functional capacity of the injured musculature at least, in part, by promoting generation of functional skeletal muscle fibers. In short, the degree of functional recovery observed following TEMR implantation (BAM+MDCs) was 2.3×-fold greater than that observed following implantation of BAM alone. As such, this finding further underscores the potential benefits of including a cellular component in the tissue engineering strategy for VML injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24066899      PMCID: PMC4518882          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2012.0761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  50 in total

1.  Macrophage phenotype as a determinant of biologic scaffold remodeling.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak; Jolene E Valentin; Anjani K Ravindra; George P McCabe; Ann M Stewart-Akers
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  Volumetric muscle loss.

Authors:  Brian F Grogan; Joseph R Hsu
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Dissociation of force production from MHC and actin contents in muscles injured by eccentric contractions.

Authors:  C P Ingalls; G L Warren; R B Armstrong
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Recovery from 6 weeks of repeated strain injury to rat soleus muscles.

Authors:  W T Stauber; C A Smith; G R Miller; F D Stauber
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Biologic scaffold remodeling in a dog model of complex musculoskeletal injury.

Authors:  Neill J Turner; John S Badylak; Douglas J Weber; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Fibrosis and intercellular collagen connections from four weeks of muscle strains.

Authors:  W T Stauber; K K Knack; G R Miller; J G Grimmett
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  Clinical application of an acellular biologic scaffold for surgical repair of a large, traumatic quadriceps femoris muscle defect.

Authors:  Vincent J Mase; Joseph R Hsu; Steven E Wolf; Joseph C Wenke; David G Baer; Johnny Owens; Stephen F Badylak; Thomas J Walters
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 1.390

8.  The promotion of a functional fibrosis in skeletal muscle with volumetric muscle loss injury following the transplantation of muscle-ECM.

Authors:  Benjamin T Corona; Xiaowu Wu; Catherine L Ward; Jennifer S McDaniel; Christopher R Rathbone; Thomas J Walters
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Myoblast-acellular skeletal muscle matrix constructs guarantee a long-term repair of experimental full-thickness abdominal wall defects.

Authors:  Paolo De Coppi; Silvia Bellini; Maria Teresa Conconi; Morena Sabatti; Enea Simonato; Pier Giorgio Gamba; Gastone Giovanni Nussdorfer; Pier Paolo Parnigotto
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2006-07

10.  A standardized rat model of volumetric muscle loss injury for the development of tissue engineering therapies.

Authors:  Xiaowu Wu; Benjamin T Corona; Xiaoyu Chen; Thomas J Walters
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2012-12
View more
  65 in total

Review 1.  Electrical and mechanical stimulation of cardiac cells and tissue constructs.

Authors:  Whitney L Stoppel; David L Kaplan; Lauren D Black
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  Strategies for functional bioscaffold-based skeletal muscle reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian M Sicari; Jenna L Dziki; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-10

3.  Recovery from volumetric muscle loss injury: A comparison between young and aged rats.

Authors:  John T Kim; Benjamin M Kasukonis; Lemuel A Brown; Tyrone A Washington; Jeffrey C Wolchok
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2016-07-17       Impact factor: 4.032

4.  Development of a biological scaffold engineered using the extracellular matrix secreted by skeletal muscle cells.

Authors:  Shiloh A Hurd; Nadia M Bhatti; Addison M Walker; Ben M Kasukonis; Jeffrey C Wolchok
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Clinical translation of tissue-engineered constructs for severe leg injuries.

Authors:  Nicolas L'Heureux; Didier Letourneur
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-06

6.  In Silico and In Vivo Studies Detect Functional Repair Mechanisms in a Volumetric Muscle Loss Injury.

Authors:  Juliana A Passipieri; Xiao Hu; Ellen Mintz; Jack Dienes; Hannah B Baker; C Hunter Wallace; Silvia S Blemker; George J Christ
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Biomimetic engineered muscle with capacity for vascular integration and functional maturation in vivo.

Authors:  Mark Juhas; George C Engelmayr; Andrew N Fontanella; Gregory M Palmer; Nenad Bursac
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Striated muscle function, regeneration, and repair.

Authors:  I Y Shadrin; A Khodabukus; N Bursac
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 9.  Engineering muscle constructs for the creation of functional engineered musculoskeletal tissue.

Authors:  Jacob P Mertens; Kristoffer B Sugg; Jonah D Lee; Lisa M Larkin
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.806

10.  Codelivery of Infusion Decellularized Skeletal Muscle with Minced Muscle Autografts Improved Recovery from Volumetric Muscle Loss Injury in a Rat Model.

Authors:  Benjamin Kasukonis; John Kim; Lemuel Brown; Jake Jones; Shahryar Ahmadi; Tyrone Washington; Jeffrey Wolchok
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.