| Literature DB >> 24066067 |
Zhaoliang Song1, Jeffrey F Parr, Fengshan Guo.
Abstract
The occlusion of carbon (C) by phytoliths, the recalcitrant silicified structures deposited within plant tissues, is an important persistent C sink mechanism for croplands and other grass-dominated ecosystems. By constructing a silica content-phytolith content transfer function and calculating the magnitude of phytolith C sink in global croplands with relevant crop production data, this study investigated the present and potential of phytolith C sinks in global croplands and its contribution to the cropland C balance to understand the cropland C cycle and enhance long-term C sequestration in croplands. Our results indicate that the phytolith sink annually sequesters 26.35 ± 10.22 Tg of carbon dioxide (CO2) and may contribute 40 ± 18% of the global net cropland soil C sink for 1961-2100. Rice (25%), wheat (19%) and maize (23%) are the dominant contributing crop species to this phytolith C sink. Continentally, the main contributors are Asia (49%), North America (17%) and Europe (16%). The sink has tripled since 1961, mainly due to fertilizer application and irrigation. Cropland phytolith C sinks may be further enhanced by adopting cropland management practices such as optimization of cropping system and fertilization.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24066067 PMCID: PMC3774741 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073747
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1The correlation of phytolith content (%) to SiO2 (%) content in different crop species (p<0.01).
General information and PhytOC content of the dominant arable crops.
| Farm crops | Area(106 hm2)a | Plant Si-richorgans | PhytOC (%)b | |
| mean | SE | |||
| Crops (total) | 1532.6 | 0.13 | 0.05 | |
| Cereals (total) | 697.7 | Stem, sheath and leaf | 0.19 | 0.07 |
| Rice | 164.1 | Stem, sheath and leaf | 0.25 | 0.07 |
| Wheat | 220.4 | Stem, sheath and leaf | 0.16 | 0.08 |
| Maize | 170.4 | Stem, sheath and leaf | 0.16 | 0.05 |
| Soybeans | 103 | Stem and leaf | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Roots and Tubers | 54.3 | Stem and leaf | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Oil-bearing crops | 62 | Stem and leaf | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Seed cotton | 35.2 | Stem and leaf | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Sugar cane | 25.4 | Sheath and leaf | 0.25 | 0.07 |
values from FAO (2012).
estimated from phytolith and silica content data (This study; ref. [19]–[21], [30]–[33]) using equation (1) and occluded-C content in phytolith of 3±1% (This study; ref. [19]–[21], [27]).
Estimated phytolith C sink produced by global farm crops in 2011.
| Farm crops | Crop output(Tg yr−1) | Si-rich organfactor | ANPP | Phytolith C sink (Tg CO2 yr−1) | |
| Mean | SE | ||||
| Crops (total) | 1.43 | 8091 | 26.35 | 10.22 | |
| Cereals (total) | 2587 | 1.37 | 3557 | 22.39 | 8.41 |
| Rice | 723 | 1.1 | 795 | 6.60 | 1.99 |
| Wheat | 704 | 1.29 | 906 | 4.93 | 2.30 |
| Maize | 883 | 1.35 | 1194 | 6.14 | 2.46 |
| Soybeans | 261 | 1.5 | 391 | 0.27 | 0.14 |
| Roots and Tubers | 807 | 0.58 | 468 | 0.3 | 0.17 |
| Oil-bearing crops | 105 | 2.2 | 231 | 0.59 | 0.70 |
| Seed cotton | 77 | 2.91 | 225 | 0.18 | 0.07 |
| Sugar cane | 1794 | 0.18 | 323 | 2.63 | 0.74 |
values from FAO [29];
mass ratios of the Si-rich organ: crop output from Huang et al. [35] and Zhu et al. [36];
ANPP: above-ground net primary productivity;
estimated from the crop output and Si-rich organ factor and PhytOC content in Table 1 using equations (2, 3);
The crop output of sugar cane is fresh cane weight.
Figure 2Phytolith carbon sink production by farm crops from different continents in 2011.
Where A: Asia, B: Europe, C: Africa, D: North America, E: South America, F: Oceania. ‘Crops’ represents the sum of all farm crops and “Cereals” represents the sum of all cereal crops including rice, wheat, maize etc.
Figure 3Phytolith carbon sink produced by global farm crops from 1961 to 2011.
Crops include all farm crops in Table 1. Cereals include rice, wheat, maize, millet, barley and sorghum.
Contribution of the phytolith C sink to the global cropland C balance for 1961–2100.
| Phytolith C | Soil C | Phytolith C contribution (%) | |||
| Period | 1961–2100 | 1961–2015 | 2016–2100 | 1961–2100 | 1961–2100 |
| Sink rate (Pg CO2 yr−1) | 0.03±0.01 | −2.93 | 2.02 | 0.08 | 40±18 |
| Total sink (Pg CO2) | 4.2±1.9 | −161.2 | 171.7 | 10.6 | 40±18 |
Sinks are positive values and sources are negative values.
the average soil C sink rate data of 1961–2015 are after Ruddiman [37].
the average soil C sink rate data of 2016–2100 are after Lal [6], [14] assuming judicious land use and recommended management practices (RMPs) are applied worldwide during 2016–2100.
Potential measures to enhance global cropland phytolith carbon sink.
| Types | Measures | Mechanisms | Comments |
| Optimization ofcropping system | Enhancement of cereal percentagein croplands | Enhancing crop output andphytolith content | High efficiency in all croplandswith low costs |
| Enhancement of multi- cropping index | Enhancing crop output | High efficiency in all croplandswith low costs | |
| Fertilization | Silicon fertilizer application | Enhancing crop phytolith content | High efficiency in cereal croplandsand sugarcane with high costs |
| Rock powder amendment | Enhancing crop phytolith content | High efficiency in cereal croplandsand sugarcane with low costs | |
| Organic mulching | Enhancing crop output andphytolith content | High efficiency in cereal croplandsand sugarcane with low costs | |
| Traditional fertilization | Enhancing crop output | High efficiency with high costs |