Literature DB >> 24065600

How to regulate nonbiological complex drugs (NBCD) and their follow-on versions: points to consider.

Huub Schellekens1, Sven Stegemann, Vera Weinstein, Jon S B de Vlieger, Beat Flühmann, Stefan Mühlebach, Rogério Gaspar, Vinod P Shah, Daan J A Crommelin.   

Abstract

The aim of this critical review is to reach a global consensus regarding the introduction of follow-on versions of nonbiological complex drugs (NBCD). A nonbiological complex drug is a medicinal product, not being a biological medicine, where the active substance is not a homo-molecular structure, but consists of different (closely related and often nanoparticulate) structures that cannot be isolated and fully quantitated, characterized and/or described by state of the art physicochemical analytical means and where the clinical meaning of the differences is not known. The composition, quality and in vivo performance of NBCD are highly dependent on manufacturing processes of both the active ingredient as well as in most cases the formulation. The challenges posed by the development of follow-on versions of NBCD are illustrated in this paper by discussing the 'families' of liposomes, iron-carbohydrate ('iron-sugar') drugs and glatiramoids. It is proposed that the same principles for the marketing authorization of copies of NBCD as for biosimilars be used: the need for animal and/or clinical data and the need to show similarity in quality, safety and efficacy. The regulatory approach of NBCD will have to take into consideration the specific characteristics of the drugs, their formulation and manufacturing process and the resulting critical attributes to achieve their desired quality, safety and efficacy. As with the biosimilars, for the NBCD product, family-specific methods should be evaluated and applied where scientifically proven, including sophisticated quality methods, pharmacodynamic markers and animal models. Concerning substitution and interchangeability of NBCD, it is also advisable to take biosimilars as an example, i.e. (1) substitution without the involvement of a healthcare professional should be discouraged to ensure traceability of the treatment of individual patients, (2) keep an individual patient on a specific treatment if the patient is doing well and only switch if unavoidable and (3) monitor the safety and efficacy of the new product if switching occurs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24065600      PMCID: PMC3889532          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-013-9533-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  16 in total

1.  Different pharmaceutical products need similar terminology.

Authors:  Daan J A Crommelin; Jon S B de Vlieger; Vera Weinstein; Stefan Mühlebach; Vinod P Shah; Huub Schellekens
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Evidence for tissue iron overload in long-term hemodialysis patients and the impact of withdrawing parenteral iron.

Authors:  Hussam Ghoti; Eliezer A Rachmilewitz; Ramon Simon-Lopez; Raed Gaber; Zeev Katzir; Eli Konen; Tamar Kushnir; Domenico Girelli; Natascia Campostrini; Eitan Fibach; Orly Goitein
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Effects of intravenous iron on mononuclear cells during the haemodialysis session.

Authors:  Alejandro Martin-Malo; Ana Merino; Julia Carracedo; Maria Antonia Alvarez-Lara; Raquel Ojeda; Sagrario Soriano; Rodolfo Crespo; Rafael Ramirez; Pedro Aljama
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 5.992

4.  Clinical case reports raise doubts about the therapeutic equivalence of an iron sucrose similar preparation compared with iron sucrose originator.

Authors:  Jürgen Stein; Axel Dignass; Kai Uwe Chow
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 2.580

Review 5.  Doxil®--the first FDA-approved nano-drug: lessons learned.

Authors:  Yechezkel Barenholz
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  The therapeutic equivalence of complex drugs.

Authors:  Huub Schellekens; Ety Klinger; Stefan Mühlebach; Jean-Francois Brin; Gert Storm; Daan J A Crommelin
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 7.  The glatiramoid class of immunomodulator drugs.

Authors:  Haim Varkony; Vera Weinstein; Ety Klinger; Jeffrey Sterling; Helena Cooperman; Turi Komlosh; David Ladkani; Rivka Schwartz
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.889

8.  Do two intravenous iron sucrose preparations have the same efficacy?

Authors:  Jacques Rottembourg; Ahmed Kadri; Emmanuelle Leonard; Aurélie Dansaert; Antoine Lafuma
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 9.  Clinical development of liposome-based drugs: formulation, characterization, and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  Hsin-I Chang; Ming-Kung Yeh
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2011-12-30

10.  Comparison of oxidative stress and inflammation induced by different intravenous iron sucrose similar preparations in a rat model.

Authors:  Jorge Eduardo Toblli; Gabriel Cao; Leda Oliveri; Margarita Angerosa
Journal:  Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets       Date:  2012-02
View more
  16 in total

1.  Reflections on FDA Draft Guidance for Products Containing Nanomaterials: Is the Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) a Suitable Pathway for Nanomedicines?

Authors:  Marden Emily; Ntai Ioanna; Bass Scott; Flühmann Beat
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Nanomedicines and Nanosimilars: Looking for a New and Dynamic Regulatory "Astrolabe" Inspired System.

Authors:  Costas Demetzos; Paraskevi Kavatzikidou; Natassa Pippa; Emmanuel Stratakis
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 3.  Nanopharmaceuticals and nanomedicines currently on the market: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Fatemeh Farjadian; Amir Ghasemi; Omid Gohari; Amir Roointan; Mahdi Karimi; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.307

4.  Intravenous Iron-Carbohydrate Nanoparticles and Their Similars. What Do We Choose?

Authors:  Ana Maria Mehedinti; Cristina Capusa; Iuliana Andreiana; Gabriel Mircescu
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2022-06

5.  Simulation of Stimuli-Responsive and Stoichiometrically Controlled Release Rate of Doxorubicin from Liposomes in Tumor Interstitial Fluid.

Authors:  Eiichi Yamamoto; Kenji Hyodo; Takuya Suzuki; Hiroshi Ishihara; Hiroshi Kikuchi; Masaru Kato
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  The Induction of Oxidative/Nitrosative Stress, Inflammation, and Apoptosis by a Ferric Carboxymaltose Copy Compared to Iron Sucrose in a Non-Clinical Model.

Authors:  Jorge E Toblli; Gabriel Cao; Margarita Angerosa
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-12-01

7.  Evaluation of the Physicochemical Properties of the Iron Nanoparticle Drug Products: Brand and Generic Sodium Ferric Gluconate.

Authors:  Joel E P Brandis; Kyle C Kihn; Marc B Taraban; Julia Schnorr; Alex M Confer; Sharon Batelu; Dajun Sun; Jason D Rodriguez; Wenlei Jiang; David P Goldberg; Peter Langguth; Timothy L Stemmler; Yihua Bruce Yu; Maureen A Kane; James E Polli; Sarah L J Michel
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 8.  Nanoparticles in the clinic.

Authors:  Aaron C Anselmo; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Bioeng Transl Med       Date:  2016-06-03

Review 9.  Nanomedicine: Principles, Properties, and Regulatory Issues.

Authors:  Sara Soares; João Sousa; Alberto Pais; Carla Vitorino
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 5.221

10.  Diluting ferric carboxymaltose in sodium chloride infusion solution (0.9% w/v) in polypropylene bottles and bags: effects on chemical stability.

Authors:  Erik Philipp; Michaela Braitsch; Tobias Bichsel; Stefan Mühlebach
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2015-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.