Literature DB >> 24065114

The FMR1 CGG repeat test is not a candidate prescreening tool for identifying women with a high probability of being carriers of BRCA mutations.

Maria Teresa Ricci1, Loredana Pennese2, Viviana Gismondi1, Chiara Perfumo1, Marina Grasso2, Elena Gennaro2, Paolo Bruzzi3, Liliana Varesco1.   

Abstract

The identification of women with a high probability of being carriers of pathogenic BRCA mutation is not straightforward and a major improvement would be the availability of markers of mutations that could be directly evaluated in individuals asking for genetic testing. The FMR1 gene testing was recently proposed as a candidate prescreening tool because an association between BRCA pathogenic mutations and FMR1 genotypes with 'low alleles' (CGG repeat number <26) was observed. To confirm this hypothesis, we evaluated the distribution of FMR1 alleles and genotypes between BRCA mutation carriers and non-carriers in a cohort of 147 Italian women, free of cancer or affected by breast and/or ovarian cancer, who were tested for the presence of BRCA mutation in a clinical setting. The distribution of FMR1 CGG repeat numbers in the two groups was similar (lower allele median/mean were 30/27.4 and 30/27.9, respectively; Mann-Whitney test P=0.997) and no difference in the FMR1 genotype distribution was present (χ(2)=0.503, d.f.=2, P=0.78). This result is in contrast with literature data and suggests that FMR1 genetic testing is not a candidate BRCA prescreening tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24065114      PMCID: PMC3895653          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  10 in total

Review 1.  Fragile X syndrome: the FMR1 CGG repeat distribution among world populations.

Authors:  Emmanuel Peprah
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 1.670

2.  Association of BRCA1 mutations with occult primary ovarian insufficiency: a possible explanation for the link between infertility and breast/ovarian cancer risks.

Authors:  Kutluk Oktay; Ja Yeon Kim; David Barad; Samir N Babayev
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Ovarian reserve determinations suggest new function of FMR1 (fragile X gene) in regulating ovarian ageing.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Andrea Weghofer; David H Barad
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 4.  Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models.

Authors:  Eitan Amir; Orit C Freedman; Bostjan Seruga; D Gareth Evans
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  CGG repeat in the FMR1 gene: size matters.

Authors:  R Willemsen; J Levenga; B A Oostra
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  FMR1 repeat sizes in the gray zone and high end of the normal range are associated with premature ovarian failure.

Authors:  Karla L Bretherick; Margo R Fluker; Wendy P Robinson
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Relevance of triple CGG repeats in the FMR1 gene to ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Andrea Weghofer; Kutluk Oktay; David Barad
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.828

8.  Variation of the CGG repeat at the fragile X site results in genetic instability: resolution of the Sherman paradox.

Authors:  Y H Fu; D P Kuhl; A Pizzuti; M Pieretti; J S Sutcliffe; S Richards; A J Verkerk; J J Holden; R G Fenwick; S T Warren
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-12-20       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results.

Authors:  Sharon E Plon; Diana M Eccles; Douglas Easton; William D Foulkes; Maurizio Genuardi; Marc S Greenblatt; Frans B L Hogervorst; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Amanda B Spurdle; Sean V Tavtigian
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.878

10.  BRCA1/2 mutations appear embryo-lethal unless rescued by low (CGG n<26) FMR1 sub-genotypes: explanation for the "BRCA paradox"?

Authors:  Andrea Weghofer; Muy-Kheng Tea; David H Barad; Ann Kim; Christian F Singer; Klaus Wagner; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Do BRCA1/2 mutations and low FMR1 alleles interact or not?

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Andrea Weghofer; David H Barad
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Is Low FMR1 CGG Repeat Length in Males Correlated with Family History of BRCA-Associated Cancers? An Exploratory Analysis of Medical Records.

Authors:  Hallee C Adamsheck; Elizabeth M Petty; Jinkuk Hong; Mei W Baker; Murray H Brilliant; Marsha R Mailick
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  BRCA1/2 mutations and FMR1 alleles are randomly distributed: a case control study.

Authors:  Efrat Dagan; Yoram Cohen; Adi Mory; Vardit Adir; Zvi Borochowitz; Hila Raanani; Alina Kurolap; Svetlana Melikhan-Revzin; Dror Meirow; Ruth Gershoni-Baruch
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Absence of BRCA/FMR1 correlations in women with ovarian cancers.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Jessica N McAlpine; C Blake Gilks; Vitaly A Kushnir; Ho-Joon Lee; Yan-Guang Wu; Emanuela Lazzaroni-Tealdi; David H Barad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.