| Literature DB >> 24064470 |
Qiyong Gong1, Lingjiang Li2, Mingying Du1, William Pettersson-Yeo3, Nicolas Crossley3, Xun Yang4, Jing Li5, Xiaoqi Huang1, Andrea Mechelli3.
Abstract
Neuroimaging techniques hold the promise that they may one day aid the clinical assessment of individual psychiatric patients. However, the vast majority of studies published so far have been based on average differences between groups. This study employed a multivariate approach to examine the potential of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data for making accurate predictions about psychopathology in survivors of the 2008 Sichuan earthquake at an individual level. Resting-state functional MRI data was acquired for 121 survivors of the 2008 Sichuan earthquake each of whom was assessed for symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) using the 17-item PTSD Checklist (PCL). Using a multivariate analytical method known as relevance vector regression (RVR), we examined the relationship between resting-state functional MRI data and symptom scores. We found that the use of RVR allowed quantitative prediction of clinical scores with statistically significant accuracy (correlation=0.32, P=0.006; mean squared error=176.88, P=0.001). Accurate prediction was based on functional activation in a number of prefrontal, parietal, and occipital regions. This is the first evidence that neuroimaging techniques may inform the clinical assessment of trauma-exposed individuals by providing an accurate and objective quantitative estimation of psychopathology. Furthermore, the significant contribution of parietal and occipital regions to such estimation challenges the traditional view of PTSD as a disorder specific to the fronto-limbic network.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24064470 PMCID: PMC3895245 DOI: 10.1038/npp.2013.251
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology ISSN: 0893-133X Impact factor: 7.853
Subject Socio-Demographic and Clinical Information (mean (SD))
| Age (years) | 43.27 (9.89) |
| Gender (M:F) | 40:81 |
| Years of education (years) | 7.02 (3.32) |
| PCL score | 38.45 (13.81) |
Abbreviations: F, female; M, Male; PCL, PTSD Checklist; PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder.
Neuroanatomical Regions With a Weight Vector Score in the Top, or Bottom, 30% of The Maximum Weight Vector Score across All Regions for the Resting-state Functional MRI-based RVR Used to Accurately Predict PCL Symptom Score. , and MNI Coordinates Refer to the Peak Weight Vector Score in each Cluster
| Frontal | |||
| Left superior frontal gyrus | 40 | −12, 34, 60 | 7.55 |
| Left middle frontal gyrus | 25 | −30, 56, 28 | 6.46 |
| Left lateral fronto-orbital gyrus | 17 | −26, 50, −18 | 7.64 |
| Right superior frontal gyrus | 16 | 22, 4, 72 | 7.27 |
| Parietal | |||
| Left superior parietal lobule | 75 | −30, −80, 48 | 7.33 |
| 32 | −36, −68, 58 | 7.64 | |
| Left post central gyrus | 56 | −56, −28, 48 | 7.10 |
| 1 | −24, −40, 76 | 5.99 | |
| Right angular gyrus | 1 | 56, −26, 54 | 5.75 |
| Frontal | |||
| Right precentral gyrus | 95 | 12, −20, 78 | −8.59 |
| 2 | 30, −22, 72 | −6.69 | |
| Left medial frontal gyrus | 79 | −2, 62, 6 | −7.93 |
| 9 | −12, −14, 78 | −7.17 | |
| Left cingulate region | 40 | −2, 46, −14 | −7.06 |
| Right cingulate region | 20 | 0, 34, −8 | −7.81 |
| Right middle frontal gyrus | 19 | 26, 44, 46 | −7.27 |
| Right superior frontal gyrus | 1 | 12, −8, 78 | −6.29 |
| Occipital | |||
| Right cuneus | 24 | 6, −100, 4 | −7.77 |
| Right superior occipital gyrus | 13 | 12, −84, 48 | −7.46 |
| Right middle occipital gyrus | 1 | 42, −76, 42 | −6.52 |
| Parietal | |||
| Right angular gyrus | 7 | 44, −56, 58 | −7.19 |
| Left superior parietal lobule | 2 | −30, −50, 72 | −6.07 |
| Cerebellum | |||
| Right cerebellum | 9 | 28, −90, −24 | −6.35 |
| 4 | 16, −92, −26 | −6.35 | |
| Subcortical | |||
| Right uncus | 2 | 30, 10, −32 | −6.39 |
Abbreviations: MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; PCL, PTSD checklist; PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder; RVR, relevance rector regression.
: weight vector score indicating the relative contribution of each voxel to the regression function.
Figure 1Scatter plot showing the predicted clinical score for each subject derived from their resting-state data using relevance vector regression (RVR), vs their actual clinical score.
Figure 2Multivariate map showing the weight of each voxel indicating its relative contribution to the regression function in the context of all other voxels (color bar in arbitrary units).