Jessica S Ancker1, Melissa C Miller1, Vaishali Patel2, Rainu Kaushal1. 1. Weill Cornell Medical College, Center for Healthcare Informatics and Policy, New York, New York, USA Health Information Technology Evaluation Collaborative (HITEC), New York, New York, USA. 2. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Washington, DC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Providing patients with access to their medical data is widely expected to help educate and empower them to manage their own health. Health information exchange (HIE) infrastructures could potentially help patients access records across multiple healthcare providers. We studied three HIE organizations as they developed portals to give consumers access to HIE data previously exchanged only among healthcare organizations. OBJECTIVE: To follow the development of new consumer portal technologies, and to identify barriers and facilitators to patient access to HIE data. METHODS: Semistructured interviews of 15 key informants over a 2-year period spanning the development and early implementation of three new projects, coded according to a sociotechnical framework. RESULTS: As the organizations tried to develop functionality that fully served the needs of both providers and patients, plans were altered by technical barriers (primarily related to data standardization) and cultural and legal issues surrounding data access. Organizational changes also played an important role in altering project plans. In all three cases, patient access to data was significantly scaled back from initial plans. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study revealed how sociotechnical factors previously identified as important in health information technology success and failure helped to shape the evolution of three novel consumer informatics projects. Barriers to providing patients with seamless access to their HIE data were multifactorial. Remedies will have to address technical, organizational, cultural, and other factors. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: Providing patients with access to their medical data is widely expected to help educate and empower them to manage their own health. Health information exchange (HIE) infrastructures could potentially help patients access records across multiple healthcare providers. We studied three HIE organizations as they developed portals to give consumers access to HIE data previously exchanged only among healthcare organizations. OBJECTIVE: To follow the development of new consumer portal technologies, and to identify barriers and facilitators to patient access to HIE data. METHODS: Semistructured interviews of 15 key informants over a 2-year period spanning the development and early implementation of three new projects, coded according to a sociotechnical framework. RESULTS: As the organizations tried to develop functionality that fully served the needs of both providers and patients, plans were altered by technical barriers (primarily related to data standardization) and cultural and legal issues surrounding data access. Organizational changes also played an important role in altering project plans. In all three cases, patient access to data was significantly scaled back from initial plans. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study revealed how sociotechnical factors previously identified as important in health information technology success and failure helped to shape the evolution of three novel consumer informatics projects. Barriers to providing patients with seamless access to their HIE data were multifactorial. Remedies will have to address technical, organizational, cultural, and other factors. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Consumer health informatics; Electronic health records; Health information exchange; Implementation research; Personal health records; Qualitative methods
Authors: Kevin B Johnson; Cindy S Gadd; Dominik Aronsky; Kevin Yang; Lianhong Tang; Vicki Estrin; Janet K King; Mark Frisse Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2008-11-06
Authors: Jessica S Ancker; Kristen M Carpenter; Paul Greene; Randi Hoffman; Rita Kukafka; Laura A V Marlow; Holly G Prigerson; John M Quillin Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2009
Authors: Jessica S Ancker; Holly O Witteman; Baria Hafeez; Thierry Provencher; Mary Van de Graaf; Esther Wei Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-06-04 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: N Lance Downing; Julia Adler-Milstein; Jonathan P Palma; Steven Lane; Matthew Eisenberg; Christopher Sharp; Christopher A Longhurst Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Janice L Kwan; Lisha Lo; Jacob Ferguson; Hanna Goldberg; Juan Pablo Diaz-Martinez; George Tomlinson; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Kaveh G Shojania Journal: BMJ Date: 2020-09-17
Authors: Antonia Hyman; Elizabeth Stacy; Humaira Mohsin; Kaitlin Atkinson; Kurtis Stewart; Helen Novak Lauscher; Kendall Ho Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Jessica S Ancker; Natalie C Benda; Madhu Reddy; Kim M Unertl; Tiffany Veinot Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-11-25 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Björn Schreiweis; Monika Pobiruchin; Veronika Strotbaum; Julian Suleder; Martin Wiesner; Björn Bergh Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 5.428