Literature DB >> 24063881

Patient and provider perceptions of why patients seek care in emergency departments.

Lana Lobachova1, David F M Brown2, Julia Sinclair3, Yuchaio Chang4, Korie Zink Thielker2, John T Nagurney2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about why patients choose emergency departments (EDs) to receive care.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to measure the distribution and frequency of the stated reasons why patients choose the ED for care and why primary care physicians (PCPs) think their patients utilize the ED.
METHODS: The authors conducted a survey of patients presenting to an ED with 92,000 annual visits. Appropriate parametric tests were used for univariate and multivariate analysis and results were presented as frequencies with 95% confidence intervals. The authors also performed a cross-sectional survey of PCPs through a web-based survey.
RESULTS: Of the 1515 patients approached, 1083 (71%) agreed to participate and 1062 (98%) of them completed the survey. The most common reason patients gave for coming to the ED was their belief that their problem was serious (61%), followed by being referred (35%). In addition, 48% came at the advice of a provider, family member, or friend. By self-report, 354 (33%) patients attempted to reach their PCPs and 306 (86%) of them were successful. Two hundred and seventy-five PCPs were also surveyed. The most frequent reasons PCPs thought their patients came to an ED were that the patient chose to go on their own (80%) and the patients felt that they were too sick to be seen in the PCP's office (80%).
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients stated that the most common reason for seeking care in an ED was that they thought their problem was serious. Almost half sought ED care on the advice of a family member, friend, or health care provider, and a sizable minority were actually referred in by a health care provider. PCPs agree that most patients come to EDs because they believe they are too sick to be seen in their office or become sick after office hours.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  emergency department; health-care−seeking behavior; overcrowding; referral; utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24063881     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.04.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  8 in total

1.  Low-acuity presentations to the emergency department: Reasons for and access to other health care providers before presentation.

Authors:  Kimberley Sancton; Leila Sloss; Jonathan Berkowitz; Nardia Strydom; Rita McCracken
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Seeking Care for Hyperglycemia in the Emergency Department: Through the Eyes of the Patient.

Authors:  Justin W Yan; Dimah Azzam; Melanie P Columbus; Kristine Van Aarsen; Selina L Liu; Tamara Spaic; Lisa G Shepherd
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2021-01

Review 3.  Why Do People Choose Emergency and Urgent Care Services? A Rapid Review Utilizing a Systematic Literature Search and Narrative Synthesis.

Authors:  Joanne E Coster; Janette K Turner; Daniel Bradbury; Anna Cantrell
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  An emergency department optimized protocol for qualitative research to investigate care seeking by patients with non-urgent conditions.

Authors:  Piers Truter; Dale Edgar; David Mountain; Caroline Bulsara
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-10-23

5.  [Analysis of the urgent attention demand in a municipality of the Central Catalonia].

Authors:  Anna Ruiz-Comellas; Jose Gregorio Zorrilla Riveiro; Montserrat Fusté Gamisans; Jacobo Mendioroz Peña
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 1.137

6.  Healthcare Providers' Perceptions of Potentially Preventable Rural Hospitalisations: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Andrew Ridge; Gregory M Peterson; Bastian M Seidel; Vinah Anderson; Rosie Nash
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Community-Engaged Needs Assessment of Deaf American Sign Language Users in Florida, 2018.

Authors:  Tyler G James; Michael M McKee; Meagan K Sullivan; Glenna Ashton; Stephen J Hardy; Yary Santiago; David G Phillips; JeeWon Cheong
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  NEDOCS: is it really useful for detecting emergency department overcrowding today?

Authors:  Bugra Ilhan; Mehmet Mahir Kunt; Filiz Froohari Damarsoy; Mehmet Cihat Demir; Nalan Metin Aksu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.